Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Surrey council area

Selling Land in Waverley

Waverley passed the government's delivery test with 117%, yet its latest statement finds only 1.28 years of housing land, because its 2018 strategy is now measured against a need of 1,481 homes a year rather than 590. The Dunsfold Park garden village, the plan's largest site, is left out of that supply, and the council is gathering sites for a new plan to 2044.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Farnham to Cranleigh, Beneath the Surrey Hills

Waverley Borough Council covers the towns of Farnham, Godalming and Haslemere and the large village of Cranleigh, which its plan groups as the communities with key services. Below them come the communities with local services: Hindhead and Beacon Hill, Bramley, Milford, Elstead, Witley and Chiddingfold. The plan describes a borough of around 345 square kilometres in the south west corner of Surrey.

  • Rural almost everywhere. The adopted plan describes about 92% of the borough as rural: 61% is Metropolitan Green Belt and a further 31% is designated countryside beyond the Green Belt.
  • Landscape on top of that. The same plan records that 77% of the countryside is Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (the Surrey Hills, now called a National Landscape), Area of Great Landscape Value, or both.
  • Two railway lines and the A3. Farnham is on the Alton line, Farncombe, Godalming, Milford, Witley and Haslemere on the London to Portsmouth line, and the A3 passes through the Hindhead Tunnel.
  • A plan in two parts. Local Plan Part 1, the strategy, was adopted in February 2018. Part 2, with site allocations and detailed policies, followed on 21 March 2023.
  • Building above target. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 counted 2,382 homes against a requirement of 2,036, a result of 117%.

That score is not the whole story here. The supply position, and the designation covering a field, matter far more.

Waverley in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    117%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Homes built against homes needed

    2,382

    of 2,036 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    February 2018

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    New Local Plan started: call for sites to 7 October 2026, adoption aimed for January 2029

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

From 590 Homes a Year to 1,481, and 1.28 Years of Land

Part 1 plans for at least 11,210 homes between 2013 and 2032, or 590 a year: 507 for Waverley's own need and 83 towards half of the unmet need of neighbouring Woking. Once that strategy turned five, national policy required supply to be tested against the government's standard method instead. The council's latest statement, published in January 2025 with a base date of 1 April 2024, sets out what that did:

Source: Waverley Borough Council, Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement, base date 1 April 2024 (January 2025).
Part of the calculationCouncil's figure
Yearly need used1,481 homes, the standard method
Five years of need7,405 homes
Buffer5%, or 370 homes, reflecting the delivery test result then in force
Five-year requirement7,775 homes
Deliverable supply1,998 homes: 452 on sites of fewer than ten homes, 1,155 on larger sites, 247 with a resolution to grant and 144 windfalls
Result1.28 years

The gap is 5,777 homes. In a statement of common ground signed in January 2025 for an appeal at Scotland Park, Haslemere, the council and the appellant agreed the same 1.28 years, and that the council "cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply" on either the previous or the current standard method. The council's supply page, updated in September 2026, still lists the January 2025 statement as its latest.

Two Measures That Point in Opposite Directions

The delivery test looks back at homes built over April 2022 to March 2025. The supply statement looks forward, against a need far above Part 1's, and it is the forward measure that carries weight in decisions here.

How Far the Shortfall Reaches, Field by Field

National policy, as revised in August 2026, treats a shortfall against five years as evidence of unmet need, to be weighed with everything else rather than decisive. How much it counts in Waverley depends on the layer a site falls into:

  1. Inside a settlement boundary. Part 2's policy DM13 accepts development in principle within the boundaries on its policies map, except in settlements washed over by the Green Belt, and national policy S4 says such schemes should be approved unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.
  2. Countryside beyond the Green Belt. Nearly a third of the borough is countryside outside the Green Belt. Here policy S5 can support homes on land well related to a settlement and served by roads, schools and drainage that can cope, and the 1.28-year figure supplies the evidence of need that S5 looks for.
  3. Villages taken out of the Green Belt. Part 1 removed Chiddingfold, Elstead, Milford and Witley from the Green Belt and widened their boundaries a little, so plots inside those boundaries are judged as land within a settlement.
  4. Grey belt. S5 does not reach the 61% that is Green Belt. There, land playing only a weak part in the Green Belt's purposes may be grey belt, and this supply position shows the need for homes that grey belt housing requires. Larger schemes must then meet the Golden Rules, as our grey belt guide explains.
  5. Inside the Surrey Hills. Major development in a National Landscape needs exceptional circumstances whatever the housing numbers say, so the shortfall helps least here.

Dunsfold Park: 2,600 Homes Planned, None Counted

Part 1's policy ALH1 shares its homes across four main settlements and one new community:

From Waverley Local Plan Part 1, policy ALH1. The villages share the remainder.
PlaceHomes in Part 1
Farnham2,780
Dunsfold Aerodrome (new settlement, policy SS7)2,600
Cranleigh1,700
Godalming1,520
Haslemere990

Among the villages, Witley with Milford takes 480, Chiddingfold 130 and Bramley 90. Dunsfold carries almost a quarter of the plan's total, so its progress bears directly on the supply figures:

  • March 2018. The Secretary of State granted outline permission for 1,800 homes, a school and an expanded business park, as the first phase of around 2,600.
  • 2019 and 2022. The site gained garden village status in June 2019, and in February 2022 the council adopted a supplementary planning document covering its masterplan framework and design codes.
  • March 2026. The council's page on the site records that Trinity College, the owner, is seeking to dispose of it to a new owner.

Inspectors at recent appeals discounted the site from the supply, and the council now leaves it out altogether "until there is more certainty about the timescales". In the meantime, larger schemes elsewhere are being tested at appeal, such as up to 400 homes at Alfold Crossways.

Farnham Park Had Room for 16 More Homes

The Thames Basin Heaths and SANG

Only about 80 hectares of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area lie in Waverley, north of Farnham, but its 5 kilometre zone of influence takes in most of the town. New homes in the band closest to the heath, within 400 metres, are presumed unacceptable. Further out, up to 5 kilometres, new homes must either provide Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG) or contribute to an existing one, and also pay towards strategic access management and monitoring (SAMM) on the heath.

The council describes Farnham Park as Waverley's only current SANG. On 1 January 2026 it recorded a capacity of 2,184 homes, 2,168 already allocated to permissions, and 16 left. It says it will refuse applications once capacity runs out unless the applicant secures SANG elsewhere, so open land that could serve as SANG has a planning role of its own. The council's call for sites asks for exactly that, alongside land for biodiversity net gain offsetting.

The Wealden Heaths

Two further protected heathland sites lie in the borough: Thursley, Hankley and Frensham Commons, which make up Phase I of the Wealden Heaths Special Protection Area, and Hindhead Commons, part of Phase II. The plan protects both, so homes near them need their effects assessed early.

The Land We Look for in Waverley

  • Land in the countryside beyond the Green Belt that sits well against Cranleigh or one of the villages.
  • Plots and backland inside Chiddingfold, Elstead, Milford and Witley, which Part 1 took out of the Green Belt.
  • Green Belt parcels enclosed by homes, roads or the railway that may count as grey belt.
  • Plots, yards and larger gardens inside the settlement boundaries of Farnham, Godalming, Haslemere and Cranleigh.
  • Open land near Farnham that could provide SANG for new homes nearby.
  • Holdings of any size able to take five or more homes, for the new Local Plan.

Many of the best opportunities here are modest, as our page on paddocks and small sites explains. We pay for all of the planning under an option at a price agreed at the start, above the land's value today. If permission is not granted, you keep the land and owe us nothing.

Waverley's Road to 2029: New Sites, an Appeal and a Plan to 2044

The Call for Sites Closes on 7 October

The call for sites runs from 26 August to 7 October 2026. It takes land for five or more homes, and for SANG, biodiversity offsetting, infrastructure and renewable energy. It is meant for new sites. The land availability assessment published on 12 August 2026, using information to 1 April 2026, identifies land that "may have potential to be considered for future development through the Local Plan process".

The Plan Timetable

The new Local Plan will guide development until 2044, with Parts 1 and 2 in force until it is adopted. The council agreed its timetable on 2 June 2026, and after a scoping consultation in June and July the next stages are:

From Waverley Borough Council's Local Plan timetable, June 2026. Dates are the council's and may move.
StageCouncil's date
Gateway 1 checkpoint23 October 2026
Proposed plan contents consultation8 February to 22 March 2027
Gateway 2 checkpoint18 October 2027
Proposed Local Plan consultation6 March to 1 May 2028
Submission for examination14 August 2028
Adoption31 January 2029

The February 2027 consultation is likely to be the first to show which land the council favours, so evidence is best prepared this winter. What happens at each stage is set out in call for sites and local plans.

The Alfold Crossways Decision

An inquiry sat in August 2026 on an appeal by Thakeham Homes and the Merchant Seamans War Memorial Society for up to 400 homes south of Dunsfold Road, Alfold Crossways, brought after the council did not decide the outline application in time. The council's appeal page showed no decision in mid-September, and the reasoning on supply will be read closely around Cranleigh.

Supply, Delivery and West Surrey

While Part 1 is more than five years old, the standard method remains the supply yardstick. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026, and at 117% none of the test's consequences applies; a result under 95% would bring an action plan, under 85% a 20% buffer and under 75% a finding of unmet need under S5. On 7 September 2026 the government confirmed that Surrey's reorganisation is unaffected by its review, with East and West Surrey going live in April 2027, so the later stages of this timetable will fall to a new unitary council rather than Waverley.

What This Means for Timing

  • Land outside the Green Belt, inside settlements or plausibly grey belt can be looked at now, while the shortfall stands.
  • Larger holdings belong in the call for sites before 7 October, with evidence built up for February 2027.
  • Near Farnham, the SANG route has to be settled before anything else.

Questions About Land in Waverley

My field is outside the Green Belt, next to a village. Does the 1.28-year supply help?

It can. Outside the Green Belt, policy S5 supports homes on land that sits well against a settlement with services that can cope, and the shortfall is the evidence of need it asks for. Landscape, access and the heaths still have to be answered first.

Should I put my land into the call for sites before 7 October?

If it could take five or more homes, or could serve as SANG or biodiversity offsetting land, yes. It is the route into the new plan, and we can prepare the submission at our cost.

My land is near Farnham. What does Farnham Park running out of SANG mean for me?

Homes within 5 kilometres of the heath need SANG mitigation, and the council's own SANG had room for only 16 more in January 2026. A scheme can instead provide its own SANG, on site or elsewhere, and open land well placed for walkers may serve as SANG for homes nearby.

Dunsfold's owner is looking to sell. Does that change anything for my land?

Not directly. The council leaves Dunsfold out of its supply until the timescale for homes there is clearer, which keeps the shortfall where it is. A new owner with a firm start date could change that, so we watch it closely.

My land was put forward to the council years ago. Should I submit it again?

Usually not. The council asks owners not to resubmit land it already knows about unless the information about it has changed significantly. If yours has changed, or has never been submitted, the window to 7 October is the moment, and we can check which applies.

Tell Us About Your Land in Waverley

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Surrey

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Surrey

    Selling land in Surrey? Most councils are behind on new homes and grey belt is being tested. We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 102%

    Selling Land in Guildford

    Own land in Guildford? The council has 2.98 years of housing land, as its need has roughly doubled since 2019. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 102%

    Selling Land in Reigate and Banstead

    Own land in Reigate and Banstead? The council now counts 4.08 years of housing land, under the five it needs. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 98%

    Selling Land in Surrey Heath

    Own land in Surrey Heath? Its land supply is 7.17 years on the old housing figure but 3.12 on the new one. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 97%

    Selling Land in Woking

    Own land in Woking? The whole borough lies within 5km of protected heath, and a new plan to 2044 has begun. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 59%

    Selling Land in Elmbridge

    Own land in Elmbridge? Its last plan was found unsound and a new one is due in 2028. See what grey belt means for you. We pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 33%

    Selling Land in Epsom and Ewell

    Own land in Epsom and Ewell? The council built only 33% of the homes it needed. We agree your price for the land up front and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 72%

    Selling Land in Mole Valley

    Own land in Mole Valley? A 2024 plan with an early review, the Surrey Hills and Green Belt explained. We agree a price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 33%

    Selling Land in Spelthorne

    Own land in Spelthorne? The council built only 33% of the homes it needed and is already reviewing its plan. We agree a price and pay for the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 38%

    Selling Land in Tandridge

    Own land in Tandridge? The council built only 38% of the homes it needed in a district that is 94% Green Belt. We pay for all the planning work.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 94%

    Selling Land in Runnymede

    Own land in Runnymede? The council's September 2025 statement found 2.89 years of housing land, not five. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.