Surrey council area
Selling Land in Waverley
Waverley passed the government's delivery test with 117%, yet its latest statement finds only 1.28 years of housing land, because its 2018 strategy is now measured against a need of 1,481 homes a year rather than 590. The Dunsfold Park garden village, the plan's largest site, is left out of that supply, and the council is gathering sites for a new plan to 2044.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
Farnham to Cranleigh, Beneath the Surrey Hills
Waverley Borough Council covers the towns of Farnham, Godalming and Haslemere and the large village of Cranleigh, which its plan groups as the communities with key services. Below them come the communities with local services: Hindhead and Beacon Hill, Bramley, Milford, Elstead, Witley and Chiddingfold. The plan describes a borough of around 345 square kilometres in the south west corner of Surrey.
- Rural almost everywhere. The adopted plan describes about 92% of the borough as rural: 61% is Metropolitan Green Belt and a further 31% is designated countryside beyond the Green Belt.
- Landscape on top of that. The same plan records that 77% of the countryside is Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (the Surrey Hills, now called a National Landscape), Area of Great Landscape Value, or both.
- Two railway lines and the A3. Farnham is on the Alton line, Farncombe, Godalming, Milford, Witley and Haslemere on the London to Portsmouth line, and the A3 passes through the Hindhead Tunnel.
- A plan in two parts. Local Plan Part 1, the strategy, was adopted in February 2018. Part 2, with site allocations and detailed policies, followed on 21 March 2023.
- Building above target. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 counted 2,382 homes against a requirement of 2,036, a result of 117%.
That score is not the whole story here. The supply position, and the designation covering a field, matter far more.
Waverley in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
117%
Meeting its housing requirement.
Homes built against homes needed
2,382
of 2,036 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
February 2018
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Updated
New Local Plan started: call for sites to 7 October 2026, adoption aimed for January 2029
Checked source
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
From 590 Homes a Year to 1,481, and 1.28 Years of Land
Part 1 plans for at least 11,210 homes between 2013 and 2032, or 590 a year: 507 for Waverley's own need and 83 towards half of the unmet need of neighbouring Woking. Once that strategy turned five, national policy required supply to be tested against the government's standard method instead. The council's latest statement, published in January 2025 with a base date of 1 April 2024, sets out what that did:
| Part of the calculation | Council's figure |
|---|---|
| Yearly need used | 1,481 homes, the standard method |
| Five years of need | 7,405 homes |
| Buffer | 5%, or 370 homes, reflecting the delivery test result then in force |
| Five-year requirement | 7,775 homes |
| Deliverable supply | 1,998 homes: 452 on sites of fewer than ten homes, 1,155 on larger sites, 247 with a resolution to grant and 144 windfalls |
| Result | 1.28 years |
The gap is 5,777 homes. In a statement of common ground signed in January 2025 for an appeal at Scotland Park, Haslemere, the council and the appellant agreed the same 1.28 years, and that the council "cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply" on either the previous or the current standard method. The council's supply page, updated in September 2026, still lists the January 2025 statement as its latest.
Two Measures That Point in Opposite Directions
The delivery test looks back at homes built over April 2022 to March 2025. The supply statement looks forward, against a need far above Part 1's, and it is the forward measure that carries weight in decisions here.
How Far the Shortfall Reaches, Field by Field
National policy, as revised in August 2026, treats a shortfall against five years as evidence of unmet need, to be weighed with everything else rather than decisive. How much it counts in Waverley depends on the layer a site falls into:
- Inside a settlement boundary. Part 2's policy DM13 accepts development in principle within the boundaries on its policies map, except in settlements washed over by the Green Belt, and national policy S4 says such schemes should be approved unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.
- Countryside beyond the Green Belt. Nearly a third of the borough is countryside outside the Green Belt. Here policy S5 can support homes on land well related to a settlement and served by roads, schools and drainage that can cope, and the 1.28-year figure supplies the evidence of need that S5 looks for.
- Villages taken out of the Green Belt. Part 1 removed Chiddingfold, Elstead, Milford and Witley from the Green Belt and widened their boundaries a little, so plots inside those boundaries are judged as land within a settlement.
- Grey belt. S5 does not reach the 61% that is Green Belt. There, land playing only a weak part in the Green Belt's purposes may be grey belt, and this supply position shows the need for homes that grey belt housing requires. Larger schemes must then meet the Golden Rules, as our grey belt guide explains.
- Inside the Surrey Hills. Major development in a National Landscape needs exceptional circumstances whatever the housing numbers say, so the shortfall helps least here.
Dunsfold Park: 2,600 Homes Planned, None Counted
Part 1's policy ALH1 shares its homes across four main settlements and one new community:
| Place | Homes in Part 1 |
|---|---|
| Farnham | 2,780 |
| Dunsfold Aerodrome (new settlement, policy SS7) | 2,600 |
| Cranleigh | 1,700 |
| Godalming | 1,520 |
| Haslemere | 990 |
Among the villages, Witley with Milford takes 480, Chiddingfold 130 and Bramley 90. Dunsfold carries almost a quarter of the plan's total, so its progress bears directly on the supply figures:
- March 2018. The Secretary of State granted outline permission for 1,800 homes, a school and an expanded business park, as the first phase of around 2,600.
- 2019 and 2022. The site gained garden village status in June 2019, and in February 2022 the council adopted a supplementary planning document covering its masterplan framework and design codes.
- March 2026. The council's page on the site records that Trinity College, the owner, is seeking to dispose of it to a new owner.
Inspectors at recent appeals discounted the site from the supply, and the council now leaves it out altogether "until there is more certainty about the timescales". In the meantime, larger schemes elsewhere are being tested at appeal, such as up to 400 homes at Alfold Crossways.
Farnham Park Had Room for 16 More Homes
The Thames Basin Heaths and SANG
Only about 80 hectares of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area lie in Waverley, north of Farnham, but its 5 kilometre zone of influence takes in most of the town. New homes in the band closest to the heath, within 400 metres, are presumed unacceptable. Further out, up to 5 kilometres, new homes must either provide Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG) or contribute to an existing one, and also pay towards strategic access management and monitoring (SAMM) on the heath.
The council describes Farnham Park as Waverley's only current SANG. On 1 January 2026 it recorded a capacity of 2,184 homes, 2,168 already allocated to permissions, and 16 left. It says it will refuse applications once capacity runs out unless the applicant secures SANG elsewhere, so open land that could serve as SANG has a planning role of its own. The council's call for sites asks for exactly that, alongside land for biodiversity net gain offsetting.
The Wealden Heaths
Two further protected heathland sites lie in the borough: Thursley, Hankley and Frensham Commons, which make up Phase I of the Wealden Heaths Special Protection Area, and Hindhead Commons, part of Phase II. The plan protects both, so homes near them need their effects assessed early.
The Land We Look for in Waverley
- Land in the countryside beyond the Green Belt that sits well against Cranleigh or one of the villages.
- Plots and backland inside Chiddingfold, Elstead, Milford and Witley, which Part 1 took out of the Green Belt.
- Green Belt parcels enclosed by homes, roads or the railway that may count as grey belt.
- Plots, yards and larger gardens inside the settlement boundaries of Farnham, Godalming, Haslemere and Cranleigh.
- Open land near Farnham that could provide SANG for new homes nearby.
- Holdings of any size able to take five or more homes, for the new Local Plan.
Many of the best opportunities here are modest, as our page on paddocks and small sites explains. We pay for all of the planning under an option at a price agreed at the start, above the land's value today. If permission is not granted, you keep the land and owe us nothing.
Waverley's Road to 2029: New Sites, an Appeal and a Plan to 2044
The Call for Sites Closes on 7 October
The call for sites runs from 26 August to 7 October 2026. It takes land for five or more homes, and for SANG, biodiversity offsetting, infrastructure and renewable energy. It is meant for new sites. The land availability assessment published on 12 August 2026, using information to 1 April 2026, identifies land that "may have potential to be considered for future development through the Local Plan process".
The Plan Timetable
The new Local Plan will guide development until 2044, with Parts 1 and 2 in force until it is adopted. The council agreed its timetable on 2 June 2026, and after a scoping consultation in June and July the next stages are:
| Stage | Council's date |
|---|---|
| Gateway 1 checkpoint | 23 October 2026 |
| Proposed plan contents consultation | 8 February to 22 March 2027 |
| Gateway 2 checkpoint | 18 October 2027 |
| Proposed Local Plan consultation | 6 March to 1 May 2028 |
| Submission for examination | 14 August 2028 |
| Adoption | 31 January 2029 |
The February 2027 consultation is likely to be the first to show which land the council favours, so evidence is best prepared this winter. What happens at each stage is set out in call for sites and local plans.
The Alfold Crossways Decision
An inquiry sat in August 2026 on an appeal by Thakeham Homes and the Merchant Seamans War Memorial Society for up to 400 homes south of Dunsfold Road, Alfold Crossways, brought after the council did not decide the outline application in time. The council's appeal page showed no decision in mid-September, and the reasoning on supply will be read closely around Cranleigh.
Supply, Delivery and West Surrey
While Part 1 is more than five years old, the standard method remains the supply yardstick. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026, and at 117% none of the test's consequences applies; a result under 95% would bring an action plan, under 85% a 20% buffer and under 75% a finding of unmet need under S5. On 7 September 2026 the government confirmed that Surrey's reorganisation is unaffected by its review, with East and West Surrey going live in April 2027, so the later stages of this timetable will fall to a new unitary council rather than Waverley.
What This Means for Timing
- Land outside the Green Belt, inside settlements or plausibly grey belt can be looked at now, while the shortfall stands.
- Larger holdings belong in the call for sites before 7 October, with evidence built up for February 2027.
- Near Farnham, the SANG route has to be settled before anything else.
Questions About Land in Waverley
My field is outside the Green Belt, next to a village. Does the 1.28-year supply help?
It can. Outside the Green Belt, policy S5 supports homes on land that sits well against a settlement with services that can cope, and the shortfall is the evidence of need it asks for. Landscape, access and the heaths still have to be answered first.
Should I put my land into the call for sites before 7 October?
If it could take five or more homes, or could serve as SANG or biodiversity offsetting land, yes. It is the route into the new plan, and we can prepare the submission at our cost.
My land is near Farnham. What does Farnham Park running out of SANG mean for me?
Homes within 5 kilometres of the heath need SANG mitigation, and the council's own SANG had room for only 16 more in January 2026. A scheme can instead provide its own SANG, on site or elsewhere, and open land well placed for walkers may serve as SANG for homes nearby.
Dunsfold's owner is looking to sell. Does that change anything for my land?
Not directly. The council leaves Dunsfold out of its supply until the timescale for homes there is clearer, which keeps the shortfall where it is. A new owner with a firm start date could change that, so we watch it closely.
My land was put forward to the council years ago. Should I submit it again?
Usually not. The council asks owners not to resubmit land it already knows about unless the information about it has changed significantly. If yours has changed, or has never been submitted, the window to 7 October is the moment, and we can check which applies.
Tell Us About Your Land in Waverley
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.
More in Surrey
County overview
Selling Land in Surrey
Selling land in Surrey? Most councils are behind on new homes and grey belt is being tested. We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 102%
Selling Land in Guildford
Own land in Guildford? The council has 2.98 years of housing land, as its need has roughly doubled since 2019. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 102%
Selling Land in Reigate and Banstead
Own land in Reigate and Banstead? The council now counts 4.08 years of housing land, under the five it needs. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 98%
Selling Land in Surrey Heath
Own land in Surrey Heath? Its land supply is 7.17 years on the old housing figure but 3.12 on the new one. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 97%
Selling Land in Woking
Own land in Woking? The whole borough lies within 5km of protected heath, and a new plan to 2044 has begun. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 59%
Selling Land in Elmbridge
Own land in Elmbridge? Its last plan was found unsound and a new one is due in 2028. See what grey belt means for you. We pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 33%
Selling Land in Epsom and Ewell
Own land in Epsom and Ewell? The council built only 33% of the homes it needed. We agree your price for the land up front and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 72%
Selling Land in Mole Valley
Own land in Mole Valley? A 2024 plan with an early review, the Surrey Hills and Green Belt explained. We agree a price and pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 33%
Selling Land in Spelthorne
Own land in Spelthorne? The council built only 33% of the homes it needed and is already reviewing its plan. We agree a price and pay for the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 38%
Selling Land in Tandridge
Own land in Tandridge? The council built only 38% of the homes it needed in a district that is 94% Green Belt. We pay for all the planning work.
Housing Delivery Test: 94%
Selling Land in Runnymede
Own land in Runnymede? The council's September 2025 statement found 2.89 years of housing land, not five. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.
Sources
- Waverley Borough Council: Local Plan Part 1, Strategic Policies and Sites (adopted February 2018)
- Waverley Borough Council: Local Plan Part 2, Site Allocations and Development Management Policies (adopted March 2023)
- Waverley Borough Council: Five Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement, base date 1 April 2024 (January 2025)
- Waverley Borough Council: Five year housing land supply (September 2026)
- Waverley Borough Council: Housing land supply statement of common ground, Scotland Park appeal (January 2025)
- Waverley Borough Council: New Local Plan (2026)
- Waverley Borough Council: Local Plan timetable (June 2026)
- Waverley Borough Council: Call for Sites (2026)
- Waverley Borough Council: Dunsfold Park Garden Village (March 2026)
- Waverley Borough Council: Thames Basin Heaths SPA and Farnham Park SANG
- Waverley Borough Council: Appeal inquiry, land south of Dunsfold Road, Alfold Crossways (September 2026)
- GOV.UK: Review of local government reorganisation launched (7 September 2026)
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.