Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:020 7946 0850

Surrey council area

Selling Land in Spelthorne

Spelthorne adopted its new Local Plan in March 2026 and, on the inspector's instruction, began reviewing it straight away. Hemmed in by the Thames, its reservoirs and a fifth of its land in the highest flood zone, it is a borough where almost every open field has a story.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Spelthorne at a Glance

The council's 2025 monitoring report gives Spelthorne an area of 5,118 hectares, of which 870 hectares, about 17%, is reservoirs. It takes in Staines-upon-Thames, Ashford, Shepperton, Sunbury-on-Thames, Stanwell and Laleham. The inspector who examined the new plan notes that the Colne Valley Regional Park, a 14-mile countryside corridor within the Green Belt, runs from Rickmansworth down to Staines and Wraysbury, where the Colne meets the Thames.

  • Two thirds Green Belt. The council puts the Green Belt at 3,324 hectares, 65% of the borough, and a quarter of it is water.
  • A fifth in the highest flood zone. About 1,072 hectares, 21% of the borough, is in Flood Zone 3, with Staines and Shepperton the worst affected.
  • Delivery of 33%. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 recorded 622 homes against a requirement of 1,874, joint lowest in Surrey.
  • A new plan, already under review. The Spelthorne Local Plan 2024 to 2039/40 was adopted on 17 March 2026.
  • West Surrey from April 2027. Spelthorne will join Guildford, Runnymede, Surrey Heath, Waverley and Woking in the new council.

The monitoring report records net completions of 138 homes in 2022/23, 287 in 2023/24 and 194 in 2024/25, against a figure of 631 a year. Those three years add up to within a handful of the 622 the government counted. The new plan is meant to change that, and the review is meant to go further.

Spelthorne in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    33%

    Below 75%: treated as having evidenced unmet housing need under national policy S5.

  • Homes built against homes needed

    622

    of 1,874 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    March 2026

    The plan currently used to decide applications.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    Plan adopted March 2026; its review began with a notice of intention in June 2026

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

A Plan Adopted, and Reviewed at Once

The plan had one of the more turbulent examinations in the South East. It was submitted on 25 November 2022 and hearings opened on 23 May 2023, but on 6 June 2023 the council asked the inspector to pause them. In September 2023 the housing minister wrote to the council expressing concern that it might withdraw the plan, and the council then asked for the pause to run until a revised national framework was published. Only on 24 October 2024 did the council vote to resume, and the remaining hearings finished on 18 February 2025.

The inspector's report, dated 4 March 2026 and announced by the council the next day, found the plan sound with main modifications. It raised the requirement from 618 to 631 homes a year, 10,726 over the plan period, against an identified supply of 9,900. The council's Green Belt FAQs put the Green Belt allocations at 24.81 hectares, 0.7% of the Green Belt, for about 740 homes. At the final stage the allocation at the former Bulldog Nurseries in Town Lane, Ashford, about 24 homes, was deleted after its owners confirmed it was no longer available, a reminder that a site only stays in a plan while its owner is committed to seeing it built.

Five Town Centre Sites Lost to Flooding

The report also deleted five allocations in Staines because each had a high risk of flooding that could not be mitigated: Bridge Street Car Park with Hanover House and the Sea Cadet building, the Surrey County Council buildings in Burges Way, the Fairways Day Centre at Knowle Green, Riverside Car Park and the Thames Lodge Hotel. Eleven more sites were made unavailable for development until a safe route in and out can be kept open during a 1% annual chance flood, with an allowance for climate change. A separate Staines Development Framework, a masterplan for the town, had gone to the inspector with the plan, but the report found it had not been finalised or independently examined and removed every reference to it.

The Immediate Review

Policy ST3 requires a partial review straight after adoption, because the 9,900 identified homes fall short of the full requirement. The inspector lists what it must cover: reassessing the housing requirement and allocating more land if needed, reviewing employment needs and the needs of Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople, and checking each policy against national policy. On 18 June 2026 the council's Environment and Sustainability Committee approved publication of a statutory notice of intention to begin plan-making. From April 2027 the work will pass to West Surrey Council. For a Spelthorne site, the evidence that tends to decide things is flood modelling and proof the owner will sell, and when to submit each is covered in the call for sites and local plans guide.

Does Spelthorne Have a Five-Year Supply?

Two council documents, three months apart, give different answers. The December 2025 monitoring report says the council was unable to demonstrate a five-year supply of housing land. The March 2026 land supply statement says it can show 5.3 years against 631 homes a year plus a 20% buffer, and the inspector's report says a deliverable five-year supply can be shown at adoption. The likely reason is timing: the monitoring report was written before the plan was adopted, and adoption brings its allocations into the supply. The March statement also bases its buffer on a delivery result of 68%, an earlier measurement than the 33% published in August 2026. For a landowner the difference matters less than it seems. The 33% result means the borough is treated as having evidenced unmet need whatever the supply figure, and the statement itself says the position will be reassessed in full through the review.

How a 33% Result Helps, and Where It Does Not

The borough is treated as having evidenced unmet housing need. In a place where the countryside is almost entirely Green Belt, that matters most in three places:

  1. Inside the urban area. Under policy S4, homes inside settlements should be approved unless the harm substantially outweighs the benefits. Older commercial buildings, car parks, garage courts and large rear gardens in Ashford, Sunbury and Shepperton all fall here.
  2. Grey belt. Small, enclosed pieces of Green Belt that do little to prevent sprawl can be grey belt. The council's own Green Belt assessment, carried out in two stages in 2017 and 2018, graded land as strongly, moderately or weakly performing, and that grading is a useful first guide. Where a site can meet the Golden Rules on affordable housing, infrastructure and green space, it can be put forward now.
  3. Previously developed land. The council's Green Belt FAQs count 409.67 hectares of brownfield land within the Green Belt. Former commercial yards, depots and lawful non-agricultural buildings have their own routes to permission.

One local trap is worth knowing. The same FAQs record waste, water and mineral workings covering 980 hectares, almost 30% of the Green Belt. Land that was worked for minerals and has provision for restoration does not count as previously developed land in national policy, even if it looks disturbed today. We check the planning history of any site like this before anything else. See our grey belt guide for how the tests work.

Water, Wildlife and Flooding

ConstraintWhat it means for land nearby
Flood Zone 3Of the 1,072 hectares in Flood Zone 3, the monitoring report puts 198 hectares in the urban area and 874 in the Green Belt. The sequential test applies, and homes must stay on the lower-risk part of any site.
The River Thames SchemeThe council describes a new river channel in two sections through Runnymede and Spelthorne, about 8.5 kilometres long, to reduce flood risk. Land on or near its route needs checking early.
Staines Commons and the reservoirsThe monitoring report says the Staines Commons and the adjoining reservoirs form a substantial Site of Special Scientific Interest, and some waterbodies are part of the South West London Waterbodies Special Protection Area and Ramsar site. Ecology surveys will be thorough nearby.
Functional floodplain and protected landThe council excluded Flood Zone 3b, common land and nationally or internationally designated nature sites from its search for Green Belt allocations.

None of these rules a site out on its own, but together they explain why so little land in Spelthorne has come forward. Our flood risk guide sets out how the sequential and exception tests work.

Heathrow and the Third Runway

Policy SP7 of the adopted plan supports Heathrow expansion for its economic benefits, provided there is comprehensive mitigation. In November 2025 the government selected Heathrow Airport Limited's own scheme for a third runway, and it consulted on its review of the national policy statement from 18 June to 1 September 2026. It aims for a final planning decision in 2029.

For land closest to the airport, that means uncertainty for several years, because the land the scheme needs and the noise it brings will not be settled until the scheme is. Until the scheme is fixed, we look at each site against the latest published plans rather than guessing.

The Land We Look for in Spelthorne

  • Enclosed Green Belt parcels next to Ashford, Sunbury, Shepperton, Staines or Stanwell, mostly in Flood Zone 1.
  • Former yards, depots and commercial sites with a lawful non-agricultural use.
  • Land within walking distance of a railway station with a frequent service.
  • Urban sites such as large gardens, garage courts and older commercial buildings.
  • Land that could be considered in the council's review of its new plan.

Many sites here need flood, ecology, noise and highways work together. We pay for all of it, and any appeal, so none of that cost falls on you. Our page on brownfield land and yards explains what we look for in previously developed sites.

Spelthorne Landowner Questions

The council has just adopted a plan. Why is it reviewing it already?

The inspector made an immediate review part of finding the plan sound, because the identified supply of 9,900 homes falls short of the 10,726 the plan requires. The review is the next chance for land that was not allocated this time.

My field was a gravel pit decades ago. Does that count as brownfield?

Usually not. National policy excludes land worked for minerals where restoration was provided for. It may still be grey belt, depending on how it performs against the Green Belt's purposes, which we assess.

Most of my land is in Flood Zone 3. Is there any point?

Sometimes, if part of it is at lower risk and can take the homes, with the rest used for open space and drainage. If the whole site is in the functional floodplain, we will tell you plainly, because the council ruled that land out of its own Green Belt search.

I am near Heathrow. Should I wait for the decision on the third runway?

Not necessarily, but timing matters. We look at the latest published proposals and advise on whether a planning route makes sense now or later.

Will West Surrey Council take a different view?

The adopted plan stays in force, and the review carries on under the new council. Housing need and national policy do not change with the council, so the pressure to find land remains.

Tell Us About Your Land in Spelthorne

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Surrey

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Surrey

    Selling land in Surrey? Housing delivery and local plans council by council, the Green Belt and grey belt, the Surrey Hills and the new councils in 2027.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 59%

    Selling Land in Elmbridge

    Selling land in Elmbridge? Why the last plan was found unsound, the fresh plan due in 2028, grey belt, Thames Basin Heaths mitigation and 59% delivery.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 33%

    Selling Land in Epsom and Ewell

    Selling land in Epsom and Ewell? A 33% delivery score, 42% Green Belt, and a Local Plan to 2040 where the inspector has proposed 16 extra sites.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 72%

    Selling Land in Mole Valley

    Selling land in Mole Valley? The 2024 Local Plan and its early review, 76% Green Belt, the Surrey Hills, Hookwood by Gatwick and a 72% delivery score.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 38%

    Selling Land in Tandridge

    Selling land in Tandridge? A 94% Green Belt district at 38% delivery, the Local Plan 2024 to 2044, grey belt, Ashdown Forest and East Surrey from 2027.