Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Surrey council area

Selling Land in Surrey Heath

Surrey Heath delivered 98% of the homes it needed, is waiting on the inspector's report for a Local Plan to 2038, and has already started the plan that will follow it. Its supply of housing land is 7.17 years or 3.12 years depending on the yardstick, and the Thames Basin Heaths shape almost every site.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

A Heathland Borough Around Camberley

Surrey Heath Borough Council is based in Camberley, and Bagshot is among the borough's other towns. It is a small borough of 95 square kilometres and about 94,500 people. The west is largely built up, though heaths still form a green buffer around Camberley, Lightwater, Deepcut, Frimley, Frimley Green and Mytchett; the east is less urbanised and holds the four parishes of Bisley, Chobham, West End and Windlesham. Chobham Common and Lightwater Country Park belong to the wider Thames Basin Heaths.

  • Heath first. The council's own plan report says the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area covers 23% of the borough, with a further 19% inside the 400 metre zone where new homes cannot be built.
  • Green Belt second. The same report puts approximately half of the borough in the Metropolitan Green Belt.
  • An old plan nearing replacement. The Core Strategy and Development Management Policies date from February 2012. The new Surrey Heath Local Plan 2019 to 2038 was submitted for examination in December 2024.
  • On target for delivery. The borough built 950 homes against a requirement of 965 in the Housing Delivery Test 2025.

Put those shares together and the room for new homes is tight. Where a site sits in relation to the heaths often matters more than the housing numbers, and that is where our review starts.

Surrey Heath in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    98%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Homes built against homes needed

    950

    of 965 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    February 2012

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    Consultation on the inspector's changes held May to July 2026

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

The 2038 Plan: 5,578 Homes and No Green Belt Release

The plan the council submitted sets a requirement of 5,578 new homes for 2019 to 2038. The standard method of the time gave 321 a year, and the council's July 2024 report says the total reflects the borough's constraints and land supply, and 533 homes to be delivered in Hart towards Surrey Heath's unmet need between 2019 and 2032. The main sources of supply are:

  • Mindenhurst, Deepcut (policy HA4), the former Princess Royal Barracks, for 1,200 homes, some already built or under way.
  • London Road Block, Camberley (policy HA2), for approximately 550 homes with other town centre uses.
  • Camberley town centre more widely, where the council looks for high quality, high density development on key sites.

The report is blunt about the Green Belt: "No Green Belt sites are allocated for residential development in the Plan", although landowners and developers put several forward, including a larger scheme at Fairoaks. Fairoaks is instead recognised as a strategically important employment area.

Through Examination

Hearings ran in September, October and December 2025. In a letter of 21 January 2026 the inspector concluded that, with main modifications, the plan is likely to be capable of being found sound and legally compliant. One housing allocation goes: land to the rear of 1 to 47 Sullivan Road, Camberley, which he found unjustified because of its narrow shape, its closeness to existing homes and its mature trees. The modifications were consulted on from 28 May to 9 July 2026, and the council's plan page records that the inspector is now considering the responses before his final report.

One further point in the council's own words matters for the future. Its FAQ says the plan was examined against national policy published in 2023 and "has a shortfall in housing compared to the recently increased housing requirement for the area."

7.17 Years or 3.12: Two Yardsticks for One Supply

The council's five-year supply statement, measured at 1 April 2025, finds 2,107 deliverable homes. What those homes amount to depends on the need they are set against, and the council publishes both calculations:

Source: Surrey Heath Borough Council, Strategic Land Availability Assessment 2025, Appendices 9 and 10.
StepMain statementAgainst the December 2024 method
Local housing need a year321, the older standard method684, the current standard method
Hart's share of unmet need41 a year taken off, leaving 28041 a year taken off, leaving 643
Buffer5%5%
Five-year requirement1,470 homes3,376 homes
Deliverable supply2,107 homes2,107 homes
Result7.17 years3.12 years

The main statement uses the older figure under the transitional arrangements that let the new plan be examined against the 2023 framework. The second calculation shows the same supply against today's method. Which yardstick a decision-maker adopts can be argued on an appeal; the council's own documents set both out.

One Figure, Printed Two Ways

The council's monitoring web page summarises the statement as showing 7.71 years. The statement itself gives 7.17, and its table produces that figure: 2,107 deliverable homes against a five-year requirement of 1,470. The two differ only in the order of the last two digits, so this page uses the statement's own figure. For a landowner nothing turns on it: either way the older measure puts the borough above five years.

What Adoption Changes

Appendix 9 says that once the new plan is adopted its housing requirement applies to the supply calculation. Spread over 19 years, 5,578 homes is about 294 a year, lower even than the older standard method, so adoption would set the measure far below today's need figure. Under policy S5 of the August 2026 framework, a shortfall would count as evidence of unmet need for well related land outside the Green Belt, and grey belt housing likewise needs evidenced need. On the main figure neither route has that evidence today, which is why the plan review below matters so much here.

SANG: The Permission Behind the Permission

The council expects new homes to be matched by Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace, or SANG, which draws walkers away from the heaths, plus a payment towards managing visitors on them. Schemes of fewer than 136 net homes can usually take up capacity at one of the council's SANGs, subject to availability. Larger schemes are expected to find their own, although some in the western urban area around Camberley may use strategic capacity. The council collects SANG money through the Community Infrastructure Levy, and it now asks applicants to request capacity from its Head of Regulatory Services rather than allocating it when an application is validated.

From the council's SANG and SAMM mitigation page.
Council SANGCapacity shown by the council
Blackwater Park, Chobham Place Woods, Swan LakesFull
Windlemere, Chobham MeadowsCapacity available
Hawley Meadows, Shepherd MeadowsVery limited capacity available

The visitor management payment, known as SAMM, rose on 1 April 2026 to £1,021.86 for an average home, ranging from £596.09 for a one-bedroom home to £1,575.37 for five bedrooms or more. It is a modest, known cost. SANG capacity is the harder question, and with three council SANGs full, it is one of the first things we check. Timing matters too: since 1 August 2019 the council has limited permissions for net new homes to one year rather than three, so a scheme here needs to be ready to start soon after approval.

For a landowner there is another side to this. A holding big enough to set aside its own SANG does not depend on the council's dwindling capacity, and land further from the heaths that could serve as SANG for homes elsewhere has a planning role of its own. Our farmland page covers the larger holdings we look at.

The Land We Look for in Surrey Heath

  • Plots, yards and large gardens inside Camberley, Frimley, Bagshot, Lightwater and the other built-up areas, where policy S4 favours approval.
  • Previously developed land, including in the Green Belt, with lawful buildings or hardstanding.
  • Land more than 400 metres from the protected heaths, with a realistic SANG solution.
  • Holdings large enough to provide their own SANG alongside new homes.
  • Enclosed Green Belt land on village edges that may count as grey belt once need is evidenced.
  • Sites to put into the call for sites for the plan review, from five homes upwards.

We pay for the survey and evidence work, including the heathland and SANG assessments. The option we sign with you fixes the price from the outset, pitched above what the land is worth now. You keep farming or using it throughout, and if no permission is granted, the land stays yours and you owe us nothing. The how it works page walks through each stage.

Surrey Heath Between Two Plans and Two Councils

The Inspector's Report

The next event is the inspector's final report. The council intends to adopt the 2019 to 2038 plan later in 2026, as soon as possible after it arrives. Until then the 2012 policies remain the adopted plan.

The Local Plan Review, and a Call for Sites Open Now

Because the 2038 plan falls short of the higher housing figure, the council says its successor "must be prepared in a way that meets the new targets". It started the review under the new plan-making system in June 2026. Its timetable, agreed in June, runs as follows:

From the council's Local Plan Review timetable, in effect from 25 June 2026. Dates from April 2027 depend on the new council.
StageTimetableLed by
Scoping consultation14 September to 19 October 2026Surrey Heath
Gateway 1 self-assessment26 October 2026Surrey Heath
Consultation on proposed plan contentJune to July 2027West Surrey
Consultation on the proposed planApril to May 2028West Surrey
Submission for examinationOctober 2028West Surrey
AdoptionApril 2029West Surrey

The call for sites runs until noon on 2 November 2026 and takes housing sites of five homes or more, which the council will assess in its land availability work. With a need figure more than double the plan's, this review is where land beyond the town and village edges, including Green Belt, can be weighed. For what happens to a site once it is submitted, see our guide to call for sites and local plans.

West Surrey

On 7 September 2026, launching a review of reorganisation elsewhere, the government said Surrey would not be affected and that East and West Surrey would go live in April 2027. From 1 April 2027 West Surrey Council is the planning authority for the borough. The council says the review plan, if adopted, will form part of West Surrey's development plan but apply only to the current Surrey Heath area, and that a single plan for the larger area is likely in the longer term.

The Next Delivery Test

The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026, and a new edition follows each year. At 98%, no consequence applies. A result under 95% would require an action plan, under 85% a 20% buffer on the supply, and under 75% unmet need would be treated as evidenced under S5.

What It Means for Timing

  • Land for the review should go into the call for sites before 2 November, with evidence built up ahead of the 2027 consultation.
  • Sites inside the settlements and previously developed land can be looked at now.
  • Any site needs its SANG route settled early, as capacity is the step most likely to hold it up.

Questions About Land in Surrey Heath

The council has two supply figures. Which one counts?

The council relies on 7.17 years, measured against the older housing figure. Against the current standard method the same sites give 3.12 years. Once the new plan is adopted, its own requirement becomes the measure. We look at which applies to your site before recommending a route.

My land is within 400 metres of the heath. Is it worth asking?

For homes, rarely: the council treats that zone as one where new housing cannot go. Land there may still suit other uses, or play a part as open space for a scheme next door, so it is worth a look.

Should I put my field into the call for sites before 2 November?

If it could take five or more homes, yes. It is the way into the plan review, which has to find far more homes than the 2038 plan. We can prepare the submission and the evidence behind it at our cost.

Is there any SANG left for a small scheme?

Some. The council shows capacity at Windlemere and Chobham Meadows and very little at Hawley Meadows and Shepherd Meadows, with three other sites full. Capacity is requested from the council, so we check it before committing to a scheme.

What happens to my application if West Surrey takes over midway?

West Surrey Council becomes the planning authority for the Surrey Heath area on 1 April 2027. An application is decided by whichever council holds that role at the time, under the plan then in force.

Tell Us About Your Land in Surrey Heath

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Surrey

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Surrey

    Selling land in Surrey? Most councils are behind on new homes and grey belt is being tested. We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 102%

    Selling Land in Guildford

    Own land in Guildford? The council has 2.98 years of housing land, as its need has roughly doubled since 2019. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 102%

    Selling Land in Reigate and Banstead

    Own land in Reigate and Banstead? The council now counts 4.08 years of housing land, under the five it needs. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 117%

    Selling Land in Waverley

    Own land in Waverley? Its latest statement finds 1.28 years of housing land against a need of 1,481 a year. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 97%

    Selling Land in Woking

    Own land in Woking? The whole borough lies within 5km of protected heath, and a new plan to 2044 has begun. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 59%

    Selling Land in Elmbridge

    Own land in Elmbridge? Its last plan was found unsound and a new one is due in 2028. See what grey belt means for you. We pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 33%

    Selling Land in Epsom and Ewell

    Own land in Epsom and Ewell? The council built only 33% of the homes it needed. We agree your price for the land up front and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 72%

    Selling Land in Mole Valley

    Own land in Mole Valley? A 2024 plan with an early review, the Surrey Hills and Green Belt explained. We agree a price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 33%

    Selling Land in Spelthorne

    Own land in Spelthorne? The council built only 33% of the homes it needed and is already reviewing its plan. We agree a price and pay for the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 38%

    Selling Land in Tandridge

    Own land in Tandridge? The council built only 38% of the homes it needed in a district that is 94% Green Belt. We pay for all the planning work.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 94%

    Selling Land in Runnymede

    Own land in Runnymede? The council's September 2025 statement found 2.89 years of housing land, not five. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.