Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Berkshire council area

Selling Land in Bracknell Forest

Bracknell Forest has a plan adopted in March 2024 and a delivery result of 104%, yet its own August 2026 statement finds only 3.53 years of housing land. For land that sits well against Bracknell, Crowthorne, Sandhurst or the villages, that gap matters more than the headline delivery figure.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

A Town Hemmed in by Heath, Forest and Green Belt

Bracknell Forest Council is a unitary authority covering the towns of Bracknell and Sandhurst, the villages of Crowthorne, Binfield, Warfield and Winkfield, and places such as North Ascot, Owlsmoor and College Town. It covers about 109 square kilometres and had an estimated 130,806 residents in 2024. There is no forest of that name: the woods covering more than a fifth of the borough are mostly parts of Windsor Forest, owned by the Crown Estate and Forestry Commission.

  • Green Belt to the north and east. The inspectors who examined the plan place the northern and eastern parts of the borough in the Metropolitan Green Belt.
  • Heathland close by. The council's heathland guidance says a large proportion of the borough lies within 5 kilometres of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area.
  • One town centre. The plan treats Bracknell as the borough's only town centre, with Crowthorne and Sandhurst as district centres.
  • Five neighbourhood plans. Binfield, Bracknell Town, Crowthorne, Warfield and Winkfield each have a made plan that forms part of the development plan.

They also noted that over 20 per cent of the borough is protected by designations, among them the heaths and the Windsor Forest and Great Park Special Area of Conservation.

Bracknell Forest in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    104%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Homes built against homes needed

    1,778

    of 1,715 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    March 2024

    The plan currently used to decide applications.

  • New plan progress

    No recent stage listed

    Check the council's website for its timetable.

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

3.53 Years: How a Recent Plan Came Up Short

The council's housing land supply note, reflecting the position at 1 April 2026 and updated in August 2026 to refer to the new national framework, finds 3.53 years. The workings show how a recent plan with a strong delivery record ends up short:

Source: Bracknell Forest Council, housing land supply calculation at 1 April 2026 (August 2026).
StepCouncil's figure
Yearly requirement614 homes, from policy LP4 of the plan, used because the plan is less than five years old
Government figure for comparison787 homes a year under the standard method
Past delivery4,075 homes completed since 2020/21, counting care home bedspaces, against 3,684 required, so a surplus of 391 is deducted
Buffer20%, because 614 is only 78% of 787
Five-year requirement3,215 homes, or 643 a year
Deliverable supply2,267 homes, including a windfall allowance of 311 and 50 from care home bedspaces
Result3.53 years, a shortfall of 948 homes

The buffer is the turning point. Since 1 July 2026, national policy has added a 20% buffer, for decision-making only, where a plan adopted in the last five years was examined under a framework older than December 2024 and its requirement is 80% or less of the current standard method figure. When the plan was examined, the inspectors recorded the standard method at 614 a year, and noted it had since dropped to 566 on newer data. The method changed in December 2024, and the council now puts the figure at 787, which leaves the plan's requirement on the wrong side of that line.

The contrast is sharp. The council's January 2025 statement, at 1 April 2024, flagged the rule in advance, applied a 5% buffer to the same 614 homes and found 5.15 years.

Where the Shortfall Helps, and Where It Does Not

Under policy S5 of the August 2026 framework, homes beyond a settlement's limits can be supported where there is evidence of unmet need, the land is well related to the settlement and the roads, schools and drainage can cope. A supply short of five years counts as that evidence, but it is weighed, not assumed. In Bracknell Forest each field sits in one of three positions:

  1. Outside the Green Belt and beyond 400 metres of the heaths. Here S5 does most. A field that reads as part of the edge of Bracknell, Crowthorne, Sandhurst or Owlsmoor, with safe access and room for heathland mitigation, now has evidenced need behind it.
  2. In the Green Belt to the north and east. S5 does not apply there. Homes on grey belt land still need evidence that the need for them is unmet, and a supply below five years is the usual way of showing it, so the grey belt route is more open here than the council's delivery result alone suggests.
  3. Within 400 metres of the heaths. The council's guidance sets a presumption against any net increase in homes there, whatever the supply position.

A Lesson From Warfield

A shortfall is not a guarantee. In 2022, when the council could show 4.44 years, inspectors dismissed two appeals at Warfield for 32 and 197 homes. The inspector on the larger scheme called it a development in the wrong place, divorced from the existing urban area, and the report suggests landscape and visual harm was decisive, although the land was neither a valued landscape nor subject to any designation. Sites that succeed sit naturally against the town. Our grey belt guide covers how Green Belt purposes are judged.

The 2024 Plan, Without Jealott's Hill

The Bracknell Forest Local Plan was adopted on 19 March 2024 and runs to 2037, replacing the 2002 local plan, the 2008 core strategy and some policies of the 2013 site allocations plan. The inspectors set its requirement at 10,438 homes over the plan period and found a committed supply of 9,110 already in place, leaving the new allocations a modest gap to fill. They deleted the largest proposal, a garden village at Jealott's Hill, finding that exceptional circumstances had not been shown to take 115.7 hectares out of the Green Belt, that its 1,350 homes were not needed to meet the requirement, and that it would cause significant landscape harm in a sensitive location.

What remains is led by Bracknell town centre:

Sources: Planning Inspectorate report, March 2024; Bracknell Forest Council housing trajectory, July 2026.
SiteHomes in the inspectors' reportCouncil trajectory, July 2026
The Peel Centre and The Point, BracknellAbout 900, about 600 within the plan periodNot started; 600 by 2037, 300 after
Southern Gateway, Bracknell town centreAbout 600Not started; 550 by 2037
Eastern Gateway (Town Square), BracknellAbout 210Not started
Beaufort Park, Nine Mile Ride226Under construction
Land east of Wokingham Road (Derby Field), Crowthorne217Not started; now 220

Why the Projection Falls Away After 2029

The council's trajectory projects 502 completions in 2026/27, 663 and 597 in the following two years, then 309 and 146. Buckler's Park on the former TRL site at Crowthorne and Bracknell Beeches, both under construction, carry the early years. The four sites above that have not started have no homes projected before 2030/31, and the new plan is not due for adoption until 2030. The supply note also records 416 completions in 2024/25 and 546 in 2025/26, both below the plan's 614.

SANG, SAMM and the 400 Metre Line

The Thames Basin Heaths are protected for ground-nesting birds, the nightjar, woodlark and Dartford warbler, and the council's supplementary planning document, adopted on 8 May 2025, sets out what new homes must do:

Sources: Bracknell Forest Council Thames Basin Heaths SPA SPD (2025) and SAMM tariff schedule (2026).
Distance from the heathsWhat applies
Within 400 metresA presumption against any net increase in homes
400 metres to 5 kilometresSuitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG) of at least 8 hectares per 1,000 people, plus a Strategic Access Management and Monitoring (SAMM) payment of £1,021.86 for an average home in 2026/27
5 to 7 kilometresSchemes of more than 50 homes may need mitigation, with a lower SAMM rate of £294.90

Smaller schemes usually pay towards one of the council's strategic SANGs, such as Englemere Pond, Horseshoe Lake, Shepherd Meadows or Buckler's. For a market three-bedroom home the 2025 guidance sets the SANG contribution at £6,712. The council says it cannot guarantee that every development site can be accommodated, and that it will prioritise its SANG capacity in line with its strategic objectives.

Why This Can Work in a Landowner's Favour

The guidance expects that only larger developments, of 109 homes or more, will be able to provide their own SANG. A SANG of 20 hectares or more serves homes within 5 kilometres, smaller ones less, and each needs room for a circular walk of at least 2.3 kilometres. Our farmland page explains how we look at larger holdings.

The Land We Look for in Bracknell Forest

  • Fields outside the Green Belt that adjoin Bracknell, Crowthorne, Sandhurst, Owlsmoor or College Town and lie more than 400 metres from the heaths.
  • Green Belt land in the north and east of the borough that is enclosed by roads, housing or other development.
  • Former yards, depots and commercial plots with lawful buildings, Green Belt ones included.
  • Larger holdings where part of the land could become SANG alongside the homes.
  • Sites with a safe road access, or a realistic route to one.

Land close to the heaths, or deep in open countryside, faces the hardest tests, and we will say so. Where a site is worth taking forward, we pay for the ecology, landscape, heathland and transport work under an option at a price fixed at the start, and you keep using the land meanwhile.

Bracknell Forest Before the Next Plan

The Next Supply Statement

Since December 2024 national policy has asked for the supply to be updated every year, as the council's January 2025 statement notes, so the next one would normally measure from 1 April 2027. While the 20% buffer applies, the requirement stays higher than the plan alone would set.

The Next Delivery Test

The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026, and a new edition follows each year. At 104% none of its consequences applies. The next edition should drop 2022/23, when the council's supply note records 437 completions, and add 2025/26. We make no forecast. Falling under 95% would oblige the council to write an action plan, falling under 85% would give a second reason for the 20% buffer it already applies, and falling under 75% would mean S5 takes unmet need as proven.

A New Plan by 2030

The council's Local Development Scheme for 2025 to 2028 schedules scoping and early participation for a new Local Plan in 2026/27, including a call for sites, then the first gateway assessment in autumn 2027, consultations in winter and spring 2028 and spring 2029, submission in autumn 2029 and adoption in spring 2030. Dates are the council's and may move. Our guide to call for sites and local plans explains why the earliest stage is the one to be ready for.

March 2029

The plan turns five on 19 March 2029. The special 20% buffer tied to recent plans then falls away, and the government's standard method replaces the 614 a year as the yardstick. On today's 787 with a 5% buffer, that yardstick would be higher than the 643 a year used now, so the change alone would not close the gap.

No Reorganisation, a Possible Mayor

Bracknell Forest is already a unitary council and remains the planning authority. In January 2026 it confirmed all-out elections for May 2027 and described talks on a Thames Valley mayoral strategic authority, with other Berkshire, Oxfordshire and Swindon councils, as work at a higher, strategic level.

What This Means for Timing

  • Land outside the Green Belt and clear of the 400 metre zone, and grey belt land, is best looked at now, while the shortfall stands.
  • Land that needs the new plan should be ready for the call for sites.

Questions About Land in Bracknell Forest

The council scored 104% on delivery. Why would my land have a better chance now?

Because the land supply is a separate test. The council's own figures show 3.53 years, and a shortfall counts as evidence of unmet need, both under policy S5 outside the Green Belt and in the grey belt test within it.

My field near Crowthorne is about a kilometre from the heaths. Does that rule it out?

No. The presumption against new homes applies within 400 metres. Between 400 metres and 5 kilometres, homes need SANG and a SAMM payment, which is a cost and a design question rather than a bar. We check capacity at the nearest SANG early.

My land was part of the Jealott's Hill proposal. Is that the end of it?

Not necessarily. The new plan must look at land again against a higher government figure, though a scheme on that scale faces a high bar after the inspectors' landscape findings.

Could part of my farm be used as SANG?

Possibly. Open land big enough for the circular walk, close to where homes are planned, can serve a neighbouring scheme, which matters more now the council cannot guarantee room at its own SANGs.

Would a Thames Valley mayor change planning for my land?

Not directly for now. The council remains the authority that decides applications and prepares the Local Plan. Our Berkshire page shows how the neighbouring councils compare.

Tell Us About Your Land in Bracknell Forest

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Berkshire

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Berkshire

    Selling land in Berkshire? How each of its six councils is doing on new homes, and what the Green Belt means for you. We pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 54%

    Selling Land in Slough

    Own land in Slough? The council built 54% of the homes it needed and its plan dates from 2008. We agree a price up front and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 74%

    Selling Land in Windsor and Maidenhead

    Own land in Windsor and Maidenhead? The borough is just short on new homes and a new plan is starting. We agree your price and pay for the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 136%

    Selling Land in Reading

    Own land in Reading? The council reports only 3.55 years of housing land supply, so urban sites count. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 114%

    Selling Land in West Berkshire

    Own land in West Berkshire? A new local plan is under way, with adoption aimed for April 2029. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 100%

    Selling Land in Wokingham

    Own land in Wokingham? The council counts only 2.5 years of housing land against the government's figure. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.