Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Berkshire council area

Selling Land in Wokingham

Wokingham has met its housing delivery test with a result of 100%, yet on its own latest count it holds only two and a half years of housing land against the government's figure. A Local Plan Update to 2040, built around a new garden village beside the River Loddon, is close to the end of its examination, and adoption will change how that shortfall is measured.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Four Growth Areas, a Garden Village and the Loddon

Wokingham Borough Council is a unitary authority covering the market town of Wokingham, the towns of Earley and Woodley, Winnersh and Shinfield, the villages of Twyford, Wargrave and Charvil in the north, and Finchampstead, Barkham, Arborfield and Spencers Wood in the south. The council's plan puts the population at 177,500 across 17,892 hectares and 17 parishes.

  • Planned growth. The Core Strategy adopted in January 2010 put most new homes in four Strategic Development Locations: Arborfield Garrison, South of the M4, North Wokingham and South Wokingham.
  • Delivery on target. In the Housing Delivery Test 2025 the borough built 2,316 homes against a requirement of 2,324, a result of 100%.
  • A short supply all the same. The council's statement at 31 March 2025 counts 2.5 years of deliverable housing land, measured against the government's standard method.
  • Green Belt only in the north. The Core Strategy places the Green Belt on the parts of the borough next to Windsor and Maidenhead, around Twyford, Ruscombe and Wargrave, and the countryside further south lies outside it.
  • Heath and river. Significant areas in the south of the borough fall within the Thames Basin Heaths mitigation zones, and the Loddon and its brooks cross the borough.

For a landowner here, the supply figure is the one that opens doors.

Wokingham in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    100%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Homes built against homes needed

    2,316

    of 2,324 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    January 2010

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    Inspectors wrote in August 2026 that the plan is likely capable of being found sound with changes; consultation on the changes to follow

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

Two and a Half Years of Land Against 1,316 Homes a Year

The latest five-year supply statement, finalised in August 2025 with a base date of 31 March 2025, uses the government's standard method because both the 2010 Core Strategy and the 2014 Managing Development Delivery plan are over five years old. The December 2024 method took the borough's figure from 748 to 1,316 homes a year, a 76% rise:

Source: Wokingham Borough Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement at 31 March 2025 (August 2025).
Step in the calculationCouncil's figure
Annual need used1,316 homes, the December 2024 standard method
Buffer5%, because the borough had comfortably passed the delivery test then in force
Five years of need with the buffer6,909 homes, or 1,382 a year
Deliverable supply counted3,453 homes
Years of supply2.5

The gap, roughly 3,450 homes, is about as large as the supply itself. Its make-up is telling: 1,511 of the 3,453 homes are on large sites without full or outline permission that the council judges deliverable, more than the 1,129 on large sites that do have one.

What the Shortfall Does, and Does Not, Do

Under policy S5 of the August 2026 framework, a supply below five years is evidence of unmet need for homes beyond a settlement's edge. It is not a permission in waiting: the land must sit well against the town or village beside it, with roads, schools and drainage able to cope. With the Green Belt confined to the north, S5 reaches most of the borough, from the edges of Wokingham and Finchampstead to the villages around Arborfield and Shinfield. S5 does not apply in the Green Belt around Twyford and Wargrave, but the shortfall still counts there, because grey belt housing is allowed only where need is shown, and a short supply is one of the usual ways of showing it.

A 2006 to 2026 Plan and the Update Replacing It

The Core Strategy planned for at least 12,460 homes between 2006 and 2026, about 623 a year, so its plan period has now run its course. The council's completions show the pace easing since 2021/22:

From the council's five-year supply statement at 31 March 2025.
YearHomes completed
2020/211,206
2021/221,440
2022/23865
2023/24841
2024/25647

The Local Plan Update 2023 to 2040

The Proposed Submission Plan was published in September 2024 and submitted on 28 February 2025, and the council's examination page says the inspectors judge it against the December 2023 Framework. It therefore rests on the need figure of the time, 795 homes for 2023/24 and 748 a year after that, not the December 2024 one. Of its 12,763 homes for 2023 to 2040, 8,374 were already accounted for, leaving roughly 4,400 for new allocations:

  • Loddon Valley Garden Village (policy SS13), between Shinfield, Sindlesham and Arborfield: around 3,930 homes, about 2,700 of them by 2040, with two primary schools, a secondary school and a country park beside the Loddon.
  • South Wokingham, extended south for 1,100 more homes and a primary school.
  • Arborfield Green, with about 300 more homes at Arborfield Studios and 600 at Barkham Square, west of Barkham Brook.
  • Thirty-one smaller sites sharing around 1,700 homes.

The plan treats North Wokingham and South of the M4 as largely complete. The council's consultation material adds that affordable housing on the largest developments rises to 40%, from 35%, and that no sites are allocated in the northern Green Belt.

The Garden Village Application

The University of Reading applied in November 2025 for up to 2,800 homes there, with bridges over the M4 and the Loddon. The council expected further applications from Gleeson Land and Hatch Farm, and a decision on the first in the latter part of 2026.

Heathland to the South, the Loddon and Its Brooks

The Thames Basin Heaths

The council says a small part of the borough lies within 400 metres of the Special Protection Area, where no net new homes are permitted, and its September 2024 topic paper puts the wider zone of influence across the southern half. New homes within 5 kilometres need Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace, or SANG. The growth areas and the garden village provide their own, at 8 hectares per 1,000 new residents. Smaller schemes pay towards the strategic SANG at Rooks Nest Wood in Barkham, between £1,567.98 and £4,240.62 a home within 5 kilometres depending on bedrooms, under guidance last updated in April 2024. The topic paper recorded room there for only around 239 more homes.

A holding large enough to provide its own greenspace does not depend on that capacity, and open land that could serve as SANG has value of its own.

Rivers and Past Floods

The council's 2020 flood risk assessment lists the Thames, the Foudry Brook, the Blackwater, and the Loddon with the Twyford, Emm and Barkham brooks. In July 2007 about 300 properties flooded, 140 inside, and in the winter of 2013 to 2014 Arborfield, Swallowfield, Shinfield, Charvil, Hurst and Wargrave were worst affected. Wet ground rarely rules out a whole holding, but it decides where homes go; our flood risk guide explains the sequential test.

Which Route Suits Which Land in Wokingham

Location sets the route:

  1. Inside the towns and villages. Gardens, backland and yards within Wokingham, Earley, Woodley, Winnersh and the larger villages are judged under policy S4, which leans towards approval unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.
  2. On the edge of a settlement outside the Green Belt. Here policy S5 and the 2.5 year supply combine, provided the land is well related to the settlement and clear of the 400 metre heath zone and the wetter ground.
  3. In the northern Green Belt. Around Twyford, Ruscombe and Wargrave, a site turns on whether it counts as grey belt, a test set out with the Golden Rules in our grey belt explainer.

Small sites count too. The supply includes 240 homes from small windfall sites, and the inspectors want the plan's affordable housing threshold raised from five homes to ten, in line with national policy. Our page on paddocks and small sites shows the kind of plot that fits.

The Land We Look for in Wokingham

  • Fields and paddocks that adjoin Wokingham, Finchampstead, Spencers Wood, Arborfield, Barkham or Shinfield, outside the Green Belt.
  • Land more than 400 metres from the protected heaths, with room for greenspace or a realistic route to strategic SANG.
  • Yards, nurseries and previously developed land, including in the Green Belt around Twyford and Wargrave.
  • Land on the drier side of the Loddon and its brooks, with a road frontage or a workable access.
  • Larger holdings that could feed into the next plan, once the Local Plan Update is in place.

Our review starts with the heath distance, the flood maps and the access, which settle most early questions here. We pay for every survey and report that follows, under an option whose price is fixed at the start, above the land's present value. Farming, grazing or other use goes on meanwhile, and if permission is never secured, the land stays yours and you owe us nothing. How it works sets out each stage.

Wokingham Between the Inspectors' Letter and Adoption

Main Modifications, Then a Report

After hearings in November 2025 and from March to June 2026, the inspectors wrote on 4 August 2026 that the plan is likely to be capable of being found sound with main modifications, and that no further housing sites are needed. They asked for the first 25 garden village completions to be pushed back to 2028/29, for the proposed valued landscape designation (policy NE6) to be deleted and for two site allocations to go, one of them for Gypsy and Traveller pitches, because neither site is available. The council says consultation on the modifications will follow later in 2026, then the inspectors' report. Its 2024 Local Development Scheme aimed at adoption in May 2026; we have found no revised date.

A Different Yardstick After Adoption

National policy measures supply against an adopted plan's requirement, turning to the standard method only once that plan is more than five years old. On adoption, the update's 748 a year replaces 1,316. Since 1 July 2026, for decisions only, a 20% buffer applies where a requirement adopted in the last five years was examined against a Framework published before December 2024 and is 80% or less of the standard method figure. On today's numbers the update fits that description, since 748 is well under 80% of 1,316. Five years at 748 plus 20% comes to 4,488 homes before any adjustment for building since 2023, against the 6,909 used now. We make no forecast of the new figure, but a case that leans on today's shortfall is stronger decided before adoption than after.

The Next Supply Statement and Delivery Test

The most recent supply statement we have found is still the one at 31 March 2025. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026, and a new edition follows each year. At 100%, none of its consequences applies. Below 95% would need an action plan, below 85% would add a 20% buffer, and below 75% would treat unmet need as evidenced under S5 whatever the supply. The lower completions of recent years will feed future results.

What This Means for Timing

  • Edge-of-settlement land outside the Green Belt is worth looking at now, while the shortfall is the measure.
  • Sites inside the towns and previously developed land do not depend on the supply figure and can be reviewed any time.
  • Larger holdings are best prepared for the next plan, which would face the far higher standard method figure unless the method changes. How land enters a plan is covered in call for sites and local plans.

Questions About Land in Wokingham

The council has only 2.5 years of supply. Will my field near Finchampstead get permission?

Not automatically. The shortfall is evidence of need under policy S5, but the field must sit well against the village, with safe access and drainage, outside the 400 metre heath zone.

Why does the council have so little supply when it passed the delivery test?

One is a record and the other a forecast. The test scores past completions against the lower targets of those years, while the supply statement tests future sites against the December 2024 standard method of 1,316 homes a year, a far higher bar.

My land was put forward for the Local Plan Update but not allocated. Is that the end of it?

No. The inspectors say this plan needs no further sites, so the route is an application under S5 while the shortfall lasts, or the next plan, which would face today's much higher standard method figure.

I own land near the garden village at Shinfield and Arborfield. Does it help or hurt?

It depends where it sits. New roads, schools and a country park can make nearby land better connected, while the garden village also takes a large share of local growth. We check the application plans against your boundary.

Does the heathland charge make a small scheme unviable?

Rarely on its own. Within 5 kilometres the council's SANG contribution runs from about £1,570 to £4,240 a home, by size. It is a known cost that we allow for from the start, though strategic capacity is limited.

Tell Us About Your Land in Wokingham

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Berkshire

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Berkshire

    Selling land in Berkshire? How each of its six councils is doing on new homes, and what the Green Belt means for you. We pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 54%

    Selling Land in Slough

    Own land in Slough? The council built 54% of the homes it needed and its plan dates from 2008. We agree a price up front and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 74%

    Selling Land in Windsor and Maidenhead

    Own land in Windsor and Maidenhead? The borough is just short on new homes and a new plan is starting. We agree your price and pay for the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 104%

    Selling Land in Bracknell Forest

    Own land in Bracknell Forest? The council's latest count shows 3.53 years of housing land, short of five. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 136%

    Selling Land in Reading

    Own land in Reading? The council reports only 3.55 years of housing land supply, so urban sites count. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 114%

    Selling Land in West Berkshire

    Own land in West Berkshire? A new local plan is under way, with adoption aimed for April 2029. We agree your price and pay for all the planning.