Staffordshire council area
Selling Land in Lichfield
Checked on
Lichfield District builds well above its target, yet it is short of five years of housing land because the government's figure for its need more than doubled while its plan, adopted in February 2015, grew old. It withdrew a replacement plan from examination in October 2023, and the plan now under way is timetabled for adoption in 2029.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
In short
We buy land in Lichfield and welcome land of every kind there: fields and paddocks, inherited land, old yards and larger holdings.
Lichfield can show 3.5 years of housing land, short of the five years national policy expects. That shortfall is evidence of need which decisions must weigh, so a well placed field next to a town or village can make a case outside the local plan. It is not a guarantee. Land in the Green Belt faces stricter national tests. Its local plan dates from February 2015, more than five years ago.
We look for 2 acres or more next to, or well related to, a town or village, with a road frontage or a way to get one.
The next step is a free, confidential desktop review. We tell you which route, if any, suits your land, with no obligation.
Lichfield in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
232%
Meeting its housing requirement.
Five-year housing land supply
3.5 years
Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Position at 1 April 2025, measured against local housing need by the standard method, 746 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer. Stated by Lichfield District Council.
Checked sourceHomes built against homes needed
2,178
of 937 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
February 2015
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Latest step
Local Plan 2040 withdrawn from examination on 17 October 2023; Cabinet moved to the new 30-month system on 12 May 2026; the council's timetable of 30 June 2026 put the scoping consultation from 7 September to 5 October 2026 and Gateway 1 on 31 October 2026, with a call for sites closing date of 30 November 2026 and adoption on 1 April 2029
Checked source
See how Lichfield compares with the other 147 councils we cover
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
The Land We Look for in Lichfield
- Fields of 2 acres or more on the edge of a village outside the Green Belt, including the 2015 plan's key rural settlements.
- Green Belt land on the edge of Lichfield or the villages of the south, enclosed by housing, roads or the railway.
- Plots and backland inside the city and Burntwood, and yards with lawful buildings anywhere in the district.
- Larger holdings east of the A38 or north of Tamworth that could form part of a new settlement or allocation in the plan to 2046.
- Land mostly in Flood Zone 1, away from the Trent and Tame flood plains.
Land within 15km of Cannock Chase or in the River Mease catchment, where the council's planning obligations page sets out the mitigation each Special Area of Conservation needs, is not ruled out; it is a known cost. We pay for all the planning work, from a call for sites submission to a grey belt or S5 case, under an option agreement whose price is agreed on day one, above the land's value in its present use. You keep using the land until completion; should permission never be secured, the land stays yours and nothing is owed. Our land value page explains the figure.
The planning detail in full
A Cathedral City on the Edge of the Conurbation
Lichfield District Council covers the cathedral city of Lichfield and the town of Burntwood, its two most populated places, with Fazeley on the edge of Tamworth and villages such as Alrewas, Shenstone, Whittington, Fradley and Elford across the rest. The Local Plan Strategy places the district in south-east Staffordshire, where it "abuts the West Midlands conurbation", and describes the A38 and A5 as "important routes to the north/south and east/west respectively". The valleys of the Trent and the Tame meet east of Alrewas.
- Green Belt in the south, room in the north. The Local Plan Strategy records that the West Midlands Green Belt has held "a substantial area within the south of the District" under restraint, while the less constrained north took growth at Fradley, Alrewas and Armitage with Handsacre. The 2024 consultation put about half the district in the Green Belt. Of its four new settlement options, Packington Hall Farm sits inside it, while Whitemoor and Brookhay east of the A38 and the Thorpe Estate north of Tamworth sit outside it.
- Delivery far above target. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 counted 2,178 homes against 937 required, a result of 232%; the council's record shows 581 net completions in 2019/20, a peak of 756 in 2022/23 and 597 in 2024/25.
How a Supply of 9.5 Years Became a Shortfall
The council's supply paper of January 2026 finds 3.5 years at 1 April 2025. Because the Local Plan Strategy is more than five years old, it measures against the standard method, now 746 homes a year, rather than the plan's figure:
| Part of the calculation | Council's figure at 1 April 2025 |
|---|---|
| Local housing need, standard method | 746 a year, 3,730 over five years |
| Buffer | 5%, adding 187 homes |
| Five-year requirement with buffer | 3,917 homes, or 783 a year |
| Sites of one to four homes with permission | 221 |
| Sites of five or more homes with permission, including allocations | 1,743 |
| Strategic development allocations | 801 |
| Windfall allowance | 55 a year from 2027/28, adding 165 |
| Less 5% non-implementation and 40 demolitions or conversions | 186 |
| Net deliverable supply | 2,744 homes |
| Result | 3.5 years |
The shortfall is not about building slowly. In October 2023 the council's report to Full Council recorded a supply of 9.5 years, down from "approximately 13 years in 2021", and warned that "this position is likely to decrease in the coming years". What changed was the requirement: the 2024 consultation put local housing need at 289 homes a year under the standard method then in force, and the Cabinet report of May 2026 records that the revised method "increased the housing target for Lichfield district to 746 per year", "a 158% increase on the previous target of 289". Measured against 746 a year, the pipeline gives 3.5 years, and most of it sits on large sites: the schedule counts 400 homes in five years at Arkall Farm, 310 at Cricket Lane and 250 at Watery Lane.
What the Shortfall Means for a Field Here
Beyond the Green Belt, policy S5 in the August 2026 framework opens a route for homes where unmet need is evidenced, on land that relates well to a settlement and has the infrastructure to serve it. Here the shortfall counts as evidence for the decision maker to weigh, never as an automatic finding. S5 does not apply in the Green Belt, where the route is grey belt.
The 2015 Plan, Its Six Growth Areas and 500 Homes for Tamworth
The Local Plan Strategy 2008 to 2029, adopted on 17 February 2015, provides for "a minimum of 10,030 dwellings between 2008 and 2029". Core Policy 1 sends about 38% of it to Lichfield city and 13% to Burntwood, and names Alrewas, Armitage with Handsacre, Fazeley, Shenstone and Whittington as key rural settlements. Its strategic development allocations are South Lichfield (where the plan took Cricket Lane and the built part of Deans Slade Farm out of the Green Belt), East of Lichfield at Streethay, East of the Burntwood Bypass, Fradley and East Rugeley; the sixth growth area, a broad development location North of Tamworth, takes about 10%.
The Allocations document fixed the sites, and its inspector reported on 25 April 2019 that with main modifications it provided for 11,350 homes, "an excess of 13.16% over the LPS provision", a figure that "includes 500 dwellings to meet the needs arising from Rugeley and the same amount in relation to Tamworth". The Allocations document records Lichfield and North Warwickshire taking 500 homes each of Tamworth's shortfall, noting that Tamworth needed "a further 825 dwellings to be accommodated outside of the Borough", and places Lichfield's share within 1,129 homes on allocated sites north of Tamworth, led by Arkall Farm, which the inspector listed "for 1,000 dwellings".
The Promise to Birmingham That Led to the Withdrawn Plan
Paragraph 4.6 of the Strategy accepted in 2015 that Birmingham "will not be able to accommodate the whole of its new housing requirements for 2011-31 within its administrative boundary" and promised that, if provision was needed in Lichfield, "an early review or partial review of the Lichfield District Local Plan Strategy 2015 will be brought forward to address this matter". The Allocations document's Policy LPR committed the council to a full review addressing unmet need across the Greater Birmingham and Black Country housing market area, "inclusive of any unmet housing need arising from Tamworth Borough", and main modifications MM1 and MM2 required it to be submitted "by the end of December 2021". That review became the Local Plan 2040.
Why the Local Plan 2040 Was Withdrawn on 17 October 2023
The October 2023 report tells the story: submitted in June 2022, the plan drew the inspectors' initial letter of 8 August 2022, and a pause the council sought was confirmed on 11 October 2022:
- May 2023. In the run-up to the district elections, the report records, "the impact of the current spatial strategy, and reliance on urban expansions and use of the green belt, was an issue raised by residents".
- 5 September 2023. Cabinet recommended that Full Council consider withdrawal, and the pause was extended to 10 November 2023.
- 17 October 2023. Full Council resolved to withdraw the plan under section 22 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, advised that "it is highly likely the council would not now adopt the current submitted plan on completion of its examination" and that its own confidential "critical friend" review had "identified several areas of the plan which may not currently be sound".
- Afterwards. The examination never resumed, and the 2024 consultation document records: "In October 2023 we took the decision to cease work on this and withdraw it from the examination in public".
The cost appears with two figures. The October 2023 report gives "approximately £436,000 (not including staff costs)" spent between 2018/19 and 2022/23; the Cabinet report of May 2026 refers to "a previous plan from examination in 2023 that cost £466,000". The likely reason is that the later figure also counts spending in 2023/24, up to withdrawal. For a landowner the consequence matters more: the 2023 report warned that the tilted balance, as it then was, would "potentially make it more difficult for the council to resist planning applications" as supply fell. Supply has fallen, and the contribution to Birmingham's shortfall that the review was meant to settle is still to be made.
A Second Start, and a Third
The council consulted on issues and options for a Local Plan 2043 in late 2024. It set out four spatial options, from town focused to new settlement focused, and recorded that "several authorities in the housing market area have identified, or are in the process of identifying, housing need which cannot be met within" their own areas. On 12 May 2026 Cabinet chose not to rush that plan to the 31 December 2026 deadline for old-system plans, because a hurried plan might not be found sound, and moved to the new 30-month system so the plan could "adequately address and include options for new settlements", accepting that applications would be assessed "without an up-to-date plan in place for a longer period".
Routes for Land While the District Waits for Its Plan
With the plan out of date and supply short, the route depends on where a site sits:
- Inside Lichfield, Burntwood or a village boundary. Policy S4 applies: approve unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits, whatever the supply figure.
- Countryside outside the Green Belt. Land beside a village in the less constrained north, such as Alrewas, Fradley or Armitage with Handsacre, or east of the A38 and north of Tamworth, can use policy S5, with the shortfall weighed as evidence of need.
- Green Belt land in the south of the district and on the edge of the city. The question is grey belt: whether the land contributes little to checking the spread of the conurbation or Tamworth, keeping places apart or preserving the setting of the historic city. Where it contributes little, the supply position meets the need test today, with the Golden Rules on larger schemes.
- Rural exception sites. Core Policy 1 supports limited affordable housing for local needs on small sites in the Green Belt.
- Previously developed land. Yards and depots are judged differently from open fields, and the council is "particularly keen to hear about brownfield" land.
For an open field that needs a Green Belt boundary redrawn, the new plan is the route. The call for sites, launched on 7 September 2026 with a closing date the council gives as 30 November 2026, invites housing sites of five homes or more and other uses; submission "does not guarantee that it will be selected". Our call for sites guide and grey belt guide explain both routes.
Lichfield's Road to 2029, on the Council's Timetable
The council's local plan timetable, in effect from 30 June 2026, sets out the road to a plan for 2026 to 2046:
| Stage | Council's timetable |
|---|---|
| Scoping consultation | 7 September to 5 October 2026 |
| Gateway 1 self-assessment | 31 October 2026 |
| First draft plan consultation | 14 June to 26 July 2027 |
| Gateway 2 advice sought and published | 4 October and 1 November 2027 |
| Proposed plan consultation | 31 March to 26 May 2028 |
| Gateway 3 advice sought and published | 1 August and 1 September 2028 |
| Submitted for examination | 15 September 2028 |
| Examination recommendations published | 15 March 2029 |
| Adoption | 1 April 2029 |
The first draft plan of June 2027 will show the option and sites the council favours, so evidence prepared between the call for sites closing date of 30 November 2026 and that draft does most good; the time bought for the new settlement question makes larger holdings matter more here than in most districts. Village-edge land outside the Green Belt, and grey belt land, can be tested now.
The Next Supply Paper and the Next Delivery Result
The council measures its supply at 1 April each year; the statement for 1 April 2025 appeared in January 2026, so the next is for 1 April 2026. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 was published on 17 August 2026 and is refreshed each year. At 232%, Lichfield is far above every line: under 95% brings an action plan, under 85% adds a 20% buffer to the supply sum, and under 75% means unmet need is treated as evidenced. The 2023 report warned that delivery would follow supply downwards, and the January 2026 trajectory shows 451 homes in 2025/26 and 406 in 2026/27, against 597 completed in 2024/25.
Two Unitary Councils, on Hold
The government had chosen a north and south split for Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, which, as Lichfield Live reported, "would have seen Lichfield and Burntwood in with Stafford, East Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, Tamworth and South Staffordshire". On 7 September 2026 the government launched a review that paused those plans, a pause the council's leader called "welcome", and confirmed that the May 2027 local elections would be held on existing boundaries. The district council still prepares the plan and decides applications; our Staffordshire page follows the review.
Questions About Land in Lichfield
My field is between Lichfield and Burntwood. Is it Green Belt?
Quite possibly: about half the district is Green Belt, and the 2015 plan had to release land on the city's southern edge for Cricket Lane. The grey belt question is whether the field does much to keep the two places apart; where it does little, the shortfall meets the need test today.
I submitted land for the Local Plan 2040 or the 2043 consultation. Does the council still have it?
Not for the plan to 2046. The council says earlier submissions must go in again on its new online form, and the call for sites has a closing date of 30 November 2026.
Does Birmingham's shortage of land help my site in Lichfield district?
Indirectly. The review promised in 2015 to take some of Birmingham's unmet need was withdrawn, so the new plan must answer the same question. For a decision today, Lichfield's own supply position is what counts.
Would a new settlement at Whitemoor, Brookhay or the Thorpe Estate take all the growth?
Those were 2024 consultation options, not choices, and Cabinet moved to the new system to allow time for new settlements to be weighed. The first draft plan, timetabled for June 2027, is where a choice will show; until adoption, applications are decided on today's shortfall.
My land is in the River Mease catchment. Can homes still be built there?
Yes, with mitigation. Nutrient neutrality applies there, and the council belongs to a developer contribution strategy for the river's water quality: a cost, not a bar.
What price will you pay for my land?
We agree a fixed price with you at the start, before any planning work begins, and it is set above what your land is worth today. We cannot name a figure before we have looked at your land, because it depends on the site itself: its size, its access, how many homes it could take and the costs that come off land value, such as affordable housing, road works and drainage. After the free desktop review we can talk about a price, and once agreed it is written into the agreement.
When would I be paid?
You receive the agreed price on completion, once planning permission has been secured. The agreement sets out the milestones along the way, and it continues while any planning application or appeal is being decided. Until completion you carry on using your land as you do now, and we pay for all of the planning. If permission is not granted, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Tell Us About Your Land in Lichfield
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly.
- We reply within 2 working days, by phone or email, whichever you prefer.
- The desktop review is free and confidential, with no obligation.
- If we agree terms, we pay for all of the planning, which on a larger site can reach £300,000.
More in Staffordshire
County overview
Selling Land in Staffordshire
Selling land across Staffordshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 149%
Selling Land in Stafford Borough
Selling land in Stafford? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 1.95 years.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 220%
Selling Land in Tamworth
Selling land in Tamworth? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 1.6 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 66%
Selling Land in Stoke-on-Trent
Selling land in Stoke-on-Trent? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 160%
Selling Land in Staffordshire Moorlands
Selling land in Staffordshire Moorlands? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 171%
Selling Land in South Staffordshire
Selling land in South Staffordshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring Councils Beyond Staffordshire
- North WarwickshireWarwickshire · 1.5 years of housing land
- North West LeicestershireLeicestershire · 5.1 years of housing land
- South DerbyshireDerbyshire · 5.27 years of housing land
Sources
- Lichfield District Council: Local Plan Strategy 2008 to 2029 (adopted February 2015)
- Lichfield District Council: Local Plan Allocations 2008 to 2029, adopted version (July 2019)
- Planning Inspectorate: Report on the examination of the Lichfield District Local Plan Allocations (April 2019)
- Lichfield District Council: Five Year Housing Land Supply 2025 (January 2026)
- Lichfield District Council: Local Plan Update, report to Full Council (October 2023)
- Lichfield District Council: Local Plan 2043 Issues and Options, Cabinet appendix (October 2024)
- Lichfield District Council: Local Plan Update, report to Cabinet (May 2026)
- Lichfield District Council: Local plan timetable (June 2026)
- Lichfield District Council: Call for sites (September 2026)
- Lichfield District Council: Planning obligations, Cannock Chase and River Mease Special Areas of Conservation (April 2026)
- GOV.UK: Review of local government reorganisation launched (September 2026)
- Lichfield Live: Decision to pause local government reorganisation is an extraordinary U-turn, leader of Lichfield District Council says (September 2026)
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.