Staffordshire council area
Selling Land in East Staffordshire
Checked on
East Staffordshire joins the brewing town of Burton upon Trent to the market town of Uttoxeter, with the Needwood villages between them and the National Forest across the south east. On a plan from October 2015, the council's note for September 2025 counts 5.06 years of housing land, a margin of a few dozen homes, and in 2026 it started work on a new plan to 2043.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
In short
We buy land in East Staffordshire and welcome land of every kind there: fields and paddocks, inherited land, old yards and larger holdings.
East Staffordshire can show 5.06 years of housing land, more than the five years national policy expects, and built 181% of the homes it needed in the government's latest count. So the surest routes here are the local plan, for land on the edge of towns and villages, and sites within them, where national policy generally supports new homes. Its local plan dates from October 2015, more than five years ago.
We look for 2 acres or more next to, or well related to, a town or village, with a road frontage or a way to get one.
The next step is a free, confidential desktop review. We tell you which route, if any, suits your land, with no obligation.
East Staffordshire in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
181%
Meeting its housing requirement.
Five-year housing land supply
5.06 years
Five years or more of deliverable housing land. Position at 1 October 2025, measured against the standard method, 607 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer (637 a year). Stated by East Staffordshire Borough Council, for the five years from 1 October 2025.
Checked sourceHomes built against homes needed
2,334
of 1,289 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
October 2015
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Latest step
Local Plan 2012 to 2031 adopted in October 2015; preparation of a new Local Plan 2025 to 2043 started in 2026 and its scoping consultation ran from 29 July to 27 August 2026; the council's engagement strategy puts consultation on proposed plan content and evidence in May to July 2027 and on the proposed plan in April to June 2028
Checked source
See how East Staffordshire compares with the other 166 councils we cover
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
The Land We Look for in East Staffordshire
- Fields of 2 acres or more on the edge of Burton upon Trent or Uttoxeter, outside Flood Zones 2 and 3.
- Land next to Tutbury, Barton under Needwood, Rolleston on Dove or Rocester.
- Edge-of-village land at Abbots Bromley, Yoxall, Marchington, Mayfield, Denstone or Draycott in the Clay.
- Yards, works and vacant commercial buildings in Burton and Uttoxeter.
- Holdings of 20 acres or more, with room for the National Forest planting.
Here, talking to us early is about preparation. We commission the access, drainage, flood, ecology and landscape work the new plan will ask for, at our cost, under an option at a price fixed at the outset and set above the land's current-use value. You keep using it, and if permission is never secured you keep the land and owe nothing. How it works sets out each step.
The planning detail in full
A Brewing Town on the Trent and a Market Town on the A50
The Local Plan calls Burton upon Trent "firmly identified as a brewing town", home to Molson Coors and Marston's. Uttoxeter is a smaller market town on the A50 serving a rural population that extends into Stafford, Staffordshire Moorlands and Derbyshire Dales, and JCB has its world headquarters seven miles north at Rocester. The plan places every settlement in a hierarchy that decides where homes may go:
- Main towns. Burton upon Trent and Uttoxeter, where most growth is directed.
- Strategic villages. Tutbury, Barton under Needwood, Rolleston on Dove and Rocester.
- Local service villages. Abbots Bromley, Yoxall, Marchington, Mayfield, Denstone and Draycott in the Clay.
- Everywhere else. Places such as Bramshall, Hanbury, Newborough and Tatenhill have no settlement boundary and count as open countryside.
The Housing Delivery Test 2025 counted 2,334 homes built against 1,289 required, a result of 181%.
Just Over Five Years, by 37 Homes
The council's supply note for 30 September 2025, published in January 2026, covers the five years from 1 October 2025 and finds 5.06 years. As the plan is over five years old, it measures against the government's standard method, with the 5% buffer for a council that has not under-delivered:
| Part of the calculation | Council's figure |
|---|---|
| Local housing need | 607 homes a year (housing stock of 55,249, affordability ratio 6.97), 637 with the buffer |
| Small sites with permission | 448 homes, after a 10% lapse rate |
| Large sites with permission | 2,063 homes |
| Large sites awaiting a legal agreement or a decision | 280 homes, at Upper Outwoods Farm and Churnet Farm, Rocester |
| Care homes and other specialist accommodation | 251 homes equivalent |
| Windfall allowance, years four and five | 180 homes |
| Total supply, and result | 3,222 homes, 5.06 years |
Five years at 637 comes to 3,185 homes, so the supply clears the line by 37. Since March 2025 the notes have also counted care homes and extra care, "not previously counted"; they add 251 here. Meanwhile four brownfield sites in Burton, 1,244 homes between them, contribute nothing to the five years.
What a Small Change in the Count Would Mean
The council's own housing needs assessment of February 2026 works the standard method from a later stock figure, 56,034 homes, and reaches 616 a year, not 607. The note keeps the 55,249 figure first used in March 2025 without saying why; the assessment uses the stock count published in May 2025, the likely reason for the gap. Set the same 3,222 homes against 616 plus 5% and the result is about 4.98 years, on our arithmetic, not the council's. On the same arithmetic, leaving out the specialist accommodation would give about 4.66 years. None of this is a forecast of the next note; it shows how thin the line is.
From Nearly Nine Years to Just Over Five
The council's notes show the margin narrowing:
| Position at | Measured against, a year | Supply | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 September 2021 | 451 | 4,014 | 8.90 years |
| 30 September 2023 | 447 | 3,306 | 7.39 years |
| 30 September 2024 | 419 | 3,086 | 7.37 years |
| 31 March 2025 | 637 | 3,271 | 5.13 years |
| 30 September 2025 | 637 | 3,222 | 5.06 years |
Most of the fall came with the December 2024 framework: its standard method lifted local housing need from 419 a year to 607, and the 5% buffer, not applied in September 2024, came back on top, taking the figure measured against to 637. Building has slowed as well: completions peaked at 935 in 2022/23, then fell to 781 and to 576 in 2024/25, below 607 a year. The delivery test still finds 181% because it measures April 2022 to March 2025 against a lower requirement of 1,289 homes.
The 2015 Plan: Urban Extensions Building Out, Brewery Land Waiting
The plan provides for 11,648 homes from 2012 to 2031, stepped at 466 a year for six years and 682 a year after that. Each strategic village takes an allocation of 90 to 224 homes plus an allowance of 25 or 26, and the six local service villages 20 or 40 each. The September 2025 note shows where the larger allocations stand:
| Allocation (homes in the plan) | Position at September 2025 | In the five years |
|---|---|---|
| Branston Locks, Burton (2,580) | Phases 1 and 2 finished, 3 to 5 under construction | 440 |
| Beamhill and Outwoods, Burton (950) | All 950 approved, phases under way; 190 more beyond the allocation had a resolution to approve in January 2026 | 400, plus 190 |
| Uttoxeter West (750) | 143 homes left in phase 2; phase 3, 162 homes, has outline permission | 305 |
| Hazelwalls, Uttoxeter (400) | Permission for 429, 58 left to build | 58 |
| Molson Coors High Street and Middle Yard, Burton | No live application | None |
| Derby Road, Burton (250) | Site still occupied; talks with landowners | None |
| Branston Depot, Burton (483) | Application withdrawn in January 2024; sold for continuing commercial use | None |
A Plan the Council Keeps Finding Up to Date
In October 2020 a report to full council recommended putting off an update for up to five years, with a yearly review, and set its own test: "Were an Authority's land supply identified as being below 5 years it is reasonable to conclude that an update is necessary." The reviews of October 2023 and October 2024 each found the plan "in date and is fully effective for decision making", though at 10 years old its housing figure gives way to the standard method for supply. The 20% buffer applied to some decisions since 1 July 2026 reaches only a housing requirement adopted in the last five years, examined under a framework older than December 2024 and 80% or less of the standard method figure, so it cannot apply to a plan from 2015.
A Strip of Green Belt, Two River Valleys and a Forest in the Making
Most of the borough has no Green Belt. The plan records "a small portion of the Burton upon Trent/Swadlincote Green Belt", there to stop the two towns merging, and notes that the same land lies in the coal consultation area, "considered to be a constraint on development". It adds local Strategic Green Gaps where building is allowed only if it keeps the landscape open.
Flood risk follows the Trent and Dove valleys. The plan admits that much of Burton's built-up area is at risk, which "severely curtails the options" for growth there and at Uttoxeter. The Environment Agency says the whole investment in Burton's defences, over £30 million, reduces the risk of flooding to over 4,600 homes and 1,000 businesses, but the plan still asks for a flood risk assessment in Flood Zones 2 and 3, and homes there face the sequential test, as our flood risk guide explains.
The National Forest covers Burton and the rural south east, and Strategic Policy 26 asks schemes to add to it. Housing sites over half a hectare give 20% of the development area to woodland, and sites over 10 hectares 30%, with a payment for planting elsewhere only in exceptional circumstances. The National Forest Company adds that this comes "in addition to the statutory requirement to demonstrate Biodiversity Net Gain".
Routes for Land When the Council Shows Five Years
With five years of land and a delivery result of 181%, neither usual sign of unmet need is present. The new plan is the main route for most open fields, but not the only one:
- Inside a settlement boundary. Plots in Burton, Uttoxeter and the ten villages in the top two tiers fall under policy S4, which approves homes unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.
- Brownfield in the towns. Burton's supply includes conversions such as the Cross Street Business Centre and former Benefits Agency offices. See our brownfield and yards page.
- Exception sites. Strategic Policy 18 allows a small affordable scheme within or on the edge of a settlement, with a minority of market homes. In February 2026 an inspector allowed up to 40 affordable homes beside Tutbury Road, just outside Burton's boundary, as a First Homes exception site, 28 of them First Homes.
- Neighbourhood plans. Strategic Policy 8 allows homes outside boundaries where a made neighbourhood plan provides for them.
- Policy S5, if the numbers move. Outside the Green Belt, land well related to a settlement and served by infrastructure can be approved where unmet need is evidenced. Delivery below 75% treats that need as evidenced; supply under five years is evidence to weigh, not an automatic finding. Neither applies today.
- Grey belt. Possible only in the strip towards Swadlincote, and its need test, usually a supply short of five years or delivery below 75%, is not met at present.
A New Plan to 2043, and the Way Land Gets Into It
In June 2026 a cabinet paper proposed a new plan to 2043, warning, as Place Midlands reported, that keeping five years of land "will be increasingly difficult as the plan ages further". The council's engagement strategy put a scoping consultation, asking what the plan should contain, in July to August 2026, and sets the later stages, with adoption "all within 34 months":
| Stage | Council's timetable |
|---|---|
| Scoping consultation | July to August 2026 |
| Proposed plan content and evidence | May to July 2027 |
| The proposed plan | April to June 2028 |
| Submission | By the end of 2028, as reported in June 2026 |
The February 2026 needs assessment puts need at 616 homes a year, 11,088 over 2025 to 2043, with 153 a year affordable, and suggests 30% affordable housing on sites is plausible, subject to viability.
The council's most recent land availability assessment, its 2021 update, looked at 104 sites of about a third of a hectare or more, 712.64 hectares with room for 21,381 homes at its standard 30 homes a hectare. Seventeen, with 1,037 homes, were judged suitable and so developable; three of those were also available and achievable, with 413 homes in its first five years. The other 87 were judged not developable and put at 15 years or more, the timescale it gives land outside settlement boundaries, as they "would be subject to a Local Plan and/or Neighbourhood plan review". Being listed "should not be taken to imply" that applications will be viewed favourably. The same density gives the two Molson Coors yards and the main Derby Road site 491 homes, where the September 2025 note counts 760. The likely reason is that the plan's allocations expect more homes on these town sites; for an owner, neither figure fixes what a site takes, its design and permission do.
Comments outside the three consultation windows "will not be accepted", the strategy says, yet it wants to hear from anyone with "land which you would like to build on" "at any stage in the preparation of the plan, but the earlier the better". Fifteen sites were put forward between the 2017 and 2021 reviews, and sites whose owners had not replied were dropped. The council's call for sites form takes sites "at any time", asks especially for brownfield land, and warns that information sent after 31 March, when its monitoring year ends, "may not be included until the following year". Each step is walked through in our guide to calls for sites and local plans.
East Staffordshire Between Two Supply Notes
A later note will replace the figure on this page. Which side of five years it lands on turns on the standard method figure used (607 in the September 2025 note, 616 in the needs assessment, or a later update), on whether Burton's stalled brownfield homes stay out of the count, and on whether new permissions replace what the urban extensions build.
A Delivery Result Clear of Every Threshold
The Housing Delivery Test 2025 was published on 17 August 2026 and is refreshed each year. At 181%, nothing follows. The lines that matter sit lower: an action plan under 95%, a 20% buffer added under 85%, and need treated as evidenced under 75%.
A Southern Staffordshire Council, on Hold
The government had chosen two unitary councils for Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent from April 2028, with East Staffordshire in the southern one. Stafford Borough Council's page, updated on 7 September 2026, said the government review launched that day had put that on hold, and GOV.UK confirmed May 2027 elections on existing boundaries. Our Staffordshire page compares its neighbours.
- Ahead of the 2027 consultation. Open land is best surveyed and put forward before the council's May to July 2027 stage.
- If a note falls under five years. Surveyed land could then go by application.
Questions About Land in East Staffordshire
My field is on the edge of Uttoxeter. What changes if the council's supply slips under five years?
Policy S5 would then count the shortfall as evidence of unmet need, to be weighed, but it would not grant permission by itself. A well related field could then make its case by application as well as through the new plan.
Part of my land near Burton is in the Trent floodplain. Is it ruled out?
Not the whole holding. Homes go on the parts in Flood Zone 1, and any in Zones 2 or 3 face the sequential test. We map the zones first.
Will the National Forest planting take a fifth of my site?
On a housing site over half a hectare, 20% of the development area is expected to be woodland, 30% over 10 hectares. Open space associated with woodland can count towards it. We allow for it in our costs.
I own a paddock by a hamlet with no settlement boundary, such as Hanbury. Can anything be built?
Open market homes are unlikely under the current plan. An affordable exception scheme, a neighbourhood plan allocation or reusing rural buildings can work, and the new plan is where a village's growth is argued.
My land is in the Green Belt towards Swadlincote. Is grey belt an option?
Only if the land does little for Green Belt purposes, and even then the need test is unmet while the council shows five years and its delivery result stays above 75%. The new plan is the other way in.
What price will you pay for my land?
We agree a fixed price with you at the start, before any planning work begins, and it is set above what your land is worth today. We cannot name a figure before we have looked at your land, because it depends on the site itself: its size, its access, how many homes it could take and the costs that come off land value, such as affordable housing, road works and drainage. After the free desktop review we can talk about a price, and once agreed it is written into the agreement.
When would I be paid?
You receive the agreed price on completion, once planning permission has been secured. The agreement sets out the milestones along the way, and it continues while any planning application or appeal is being decided. Until completion you carry on using your land as you do now, and we pay for all of the planning. If permission is not granted, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Tell Us About Your Land in East Staffordshire
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly.
- We reply within 2 working days, by phone or email, whichever you prefer.
- The desktop review is free and confidential, with no obligation.
- If we agree terms, we pay for all of the planning, which on a larger site can reach £300,000.
More in Staffordshire
County overview
Selling Land in Staffordshire
Selling land across Staffordshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 160%
Selling Land in Staffordshire Moorlands
Selling land in Staffordshire Moorlands? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 149%
Selling Land in Stafford Borough
Selling land in Stafford? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 1.95 years.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 232%
Selling Land in Lichfield
Selling land in Lichfield? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 3.5 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 66%
Selling Land in Stoke-on-Trent
Selling land in Stoke-on-Trent? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 171%
Selling Land in South Staffordshire
Selling land in South Staffordshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 220%
Selling Land in Tamworth
Selling land in Tamworth? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 1.6 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 115%
Selling Land in Cannock Chase
Selling land in Cannock Chase? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 5 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 94%
Selling Land in Newcastle-Under-Lyme
Selling land in Newcastle-under-Lyme? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring Councils Beyond Staffordshire
- Derbyshire DalesDerbyshire · 1.36 years of housing land
- South DerbyshireDerbyshire · 5.27 years of housing land
Sources
- East Staffordshire Borough Council: Note on 5 Year Land Supply Methodology, 30 September 2025 (January 2026)
- East Staffordshire Borough Council: Local Plan 2012 to 2031 (adopted October 2015) and annual reviews
- East Staffordshire Borough Council: Local Plan evidence base, Local Housing Needs Assessment Update and supply notes (February 2026)
- East Staffordshire Borough Council: New Local Plan 2025 to 2043 and Engagement Strategy (July 2026)
- East Staffordshire Borough Council: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) 2021 Update (2021)
- East Staffordshire Borough Council: Planning policy consultations and call for sites
- Planning Inspectorate: Appeal decision APP/B3410/W/25/3372774, Tutbury Road, Burton upon Trent (February 2026)
- National Forest Company: Planning and development
- Environment Agency: Burton-upon-Trent flood defence work completes £30 million investment (June 2022)
- Place Midlands: East Staffordshire gears up for 2043 local plan (June 2026)
- Stafford Borough Council: Devolution and local government reorganisation (September 2026)
- GOV.UK: Review of local government reorganisation launched (September 2026)
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.