Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Derbyshire council area

Selling Land in Derbyshire Dales

Half of the Derbyshire Dales lies inside the Peak District National Park, so the district council plans only for Matlock, Ashbourne, Wirksworth, Darley Dale and the villages outside it. On that land it scored 90% in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, yet an inspector found it well short of a five-year supply of housing sites, and its replacement local plan has just been through the last public consultation before submission.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

One District, Two Planning Authorities

Derbyshire Dales is a large, mostly rural district, and its council is not the planning authority for all of it. Local reporting in September 2026 describes the National Park as covering half of the district. Inside that line, applications go to the Peak District National Park Authority; outside it, they come to Derbyshire Dales District Council, whose adopted plan describes the River Dove as its western boundary.

  • The council plans for the part outside the park. Its Local Plan covers Matlock, Darley Dale, Wirksworth, Ashbourne and the villages around them.
  • A plan adopted in 2017. The Local Plan was adopted at a special council meeting on 7 December 2017, runs to 2033 and plans for at least 5,680 homes over its twenty years.
  • Delivery just short. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 counts 589 homes built against 658 needed over April 2022 to March 2025, which puts the council in the band where it must publish an action plan.
  • Land supply well short. An inspector deciding an appeal at Clifton, reported in November 2025, recorded the council at 1.36 years of housing land supply against the five-year minimum.
  • A replacement plan at its final stage. Consultation on the plan the council intends to submit ran for six weeks from 3 August 2026.

The delivery result looks back at homes completed; the land supply looks forward at sites ready to build, and in the Dales it is the second that does the work.

Derbyshire Dales in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    90%

    Below 95%: the council must publish an action plan to improve delivery.

  • Homes built against homes needed

    589

    of 658 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    December 2017

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Published for consultation

    As at August 2026.

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

Which Land the Council Actually Decides

The Park Authority's own guidance is plain: if a property lies outside the park boundary, the application goes to the local council, and Derbyshire Dales is one of nine councils it lists around the park.

Where the council does decide, its 2017 plan ranks every settlement, and the draft policies of March 2026 still name the same market towns and local service centre:

  • Market towns: Matlock, Ashbourne and Wirksworth.
  • Local service centre: Darley Dale.
  • Villages with some facilities: Brailsford, Clifton, Cromford, Darley Bridge, Doveridge, Hulland Ward, Matlock Bath, Middleton, Northwood, Rowsley, Sudbury and Tansley.
  • Smaller villages: two further tiers, from Bonsall, Brassington and Kirk Ireton down to infill villages such as Hognaston, Shirley and Yeaveley.

Even outside the boundary, the park is never far from the argument. The March 2026 draft policies expect development on the edge of a settlement to enhance or restore landscape character, with particular regard to the setting and character of the National Park. Which side of the line a field falls on is the first thing we check.

A Delivery Pass, a Land Supply Shortfall

Policy S5 of the August 2026 National Planning Policy Framework allows homes beyond a settlement boundary where there is evidenced unmet need, the land sits physically well with the town or village, and roads, schools and drainage can cope now or through planned works. Below 75% in the Housing Delivery Test, that need is taken as given. At 90%, the Dales must show it another way, and a shortfall in the five-year supply of deliverable sites is precisely the evidence the policy recognises.

What the Clifton Appeal Shows

In October 2024 the council refused 16 houses and two apartments on Clifton Road, citing safety on the A515, harm to the countryside, flooding and the risk of Clifton merging into Ashbourne. The inspector allowed the appeal, pointing to an overwhelming need for housing delivery and the 1.36 year supply, and found the adverse impacts would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.

That was decided under the previous framework, but the reasoning carries across: a modest scheme against a village, where objections turn on character rather than a hard constraint, can succeed while the council is short of sites. It does nothing for an isolated field. Inside settlements, policy S4 already favours approval unless the harm would substantially exceed the benefits, whatever the housing numbers.

The Draft Plan and Where the Homes Would Go

Local reporting in April 2026 gave the government's housing figure for the district as 580 homes a year. The council proposed that the National Park take 158 of those, leaving the Dales with 415, with two fallbacks: 523 if the park took only 50, or the existing 284.

The council identified 28 sites for 2,133 homes, and the revised list it put out to consultation in August carries the same totals. The Wolds site has been removed. The spread of what remains is strikingly uneven:

PlaceSitesHomes
Ashbourne71,273, including about 700 between the Derby Road roundabout and Wyaston Road, either side of Moor Lane
Doveridge3243
Tansley3211
Middleton by Wirksworth2116
Darley Dale4104
Brailsford265
Matlock339
Ednaston, Hulland Ward and Northwood4 between them30, 30 and 22

Ashbourne takes well over half, and Matlock very little. A new village, potentially in the south of the district, was once set to take 70% of new housing but has been pushed back to a background option taking shape from 2035, which makes the next plan review as relevant as this one for owners in the south.

What a Scheme Here Has to Pay For

The draft policies set affordable housing at 30%, with 80% of that as social and affordable rent. In the market towns and Darley Dale it starts at major developments, but everywhere else it applies from five homes, so even a small village site carries it. Section 106 and CIL covers how these and other contributions are worked out.

Heritage adds its own layer. The Derwent Valley Mills were inscribed as a World Heritage Site in December 2001, and the adopted plan describes the site running along the valley from Cromford in the north to Whatstandwell in the south. The draft plan asks development to conserve and enhance its outstanding universal value.

The draft flood policy supports development that avoids areas of current or future flood risk and does not increase the risk elsewhere. We allow for all of this when we agree a price with you, and none of the cost falls on you.

Land We Look for in the Derbyshire Dales

  • Fields of 2 acres or more on the edge of Ashbourne, Matlock, Wirksworth or Darley Dale, outside the park boundary.
  • Land that sits well against Doveridge, Brailsford, Hulland Ward, Tansley or Middleton.
  • Sites with a safe access onto a road, which the council tested hard on the A515 at Clifton.
  • Former quarry land near a settlement, of the kind the 2017 plan allocated at Darley Dale, Matlock and Wirksworth.
  • Plots inside a settlement boundary, under policy S4.
  • Larger holdings in the south of the district, where the council has pointed its longer term thinking.

Land inside the park, or beside the mills at Cromford, faces narrower prospects, and we will say so plainly. Farmers can read more on our farmland page.

Submission, the Park's Share and a Paused Reorganisation

The Next Housing Delivery Test

The test is published once a year; the Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026. At 90% the council sits between the 85% and 95% lines. A result below 85% would add a 20% buffer to the land supply calculation, deepening an already large shortfall, and below 75% unmet need would be taken as given. A result of 95% or more would end the action plan duty but would not repair the land supply.

The Land Supply

The council's planning policy pages carry its monitoring reports, Housing Delivery Test results and Local Development Scheme, but no current five-year supply statement, so the 1.36 years tested at Clifton is the latest figure on the public record and the one we work from. A gap that wide is not closed by one good year, and the new plan's sites count only once they are allocated and ready to build.

Two Timetables, One Direction

The council's Local Development Scheme page still shows the scheme adopted on 7 December 2023, aiming for submission in June 2025 and adoption in March 2026. Reporting in July 2026 gives the current timetable: submission in December 2026, examination in 2027 and likely adoption in early 2028, though consultants warned in April it could slip to early 2029. The older scheme predates what the council calls the grossly increased housing requirement set in autumn 2024, which it says means allocating as many sites as possible to pass inspection. Under either timetable the 2017 plan stays in force, and the shortfall stays live, until a new plan is adopted.

The Park's Share of the Housing Figure

We expect the split with the National Park to be tested hardest at examination. The council's preferred figure assumed the park would take 158 homes a year, but the Park Authority's own draft plan, reported in September 2026, plans for 87 a year to 2045, allocates no sites, and contains no planned growth in response to national targets. If the inspector sides with the park, the difference would fall on the land the council controls, and its list of sites would look short.

Reorganisation

On 16 July 2026 the government decided on two unitary councils for Derbyshire, placing the Dales in a Derbyshire North council with High Peak, Chesterfield, North East Derbyshire, Bolsover and the northern part of Amber Valley, due to start in April 2028. On 7 September 2026 the government paused that decision for review, with no timeline yet for the outcome. Derbyshire Dales District Council remains the authority deciding applications and taking its plan forward.

What This Means for Your Timing

Land in the draft plan needs its allocation supported at examination. Land outside it but well placed against a town or village has a case now, while the shortfall lasts. Larger southern holdings point to the next plan cycle. The how it works page explains what we take on at each stage, and the wider county picture is on our Derbyshire page.

Questions From Landowners in the Derbyshire Dales

My land is inside the National Park. Will Derbyshire Dales District Council decide an application?

No. Inside the park boundary the Peak District National Park Authority decides. Its draft plan allocates no housing sites, and its affordable homes go to people with at least ten years' connection to the area or an adjoining parish, widened in stages if nobody qualifies.

The council scored 90%. Does that mean it has enough housing sites?

No. The score measures homes already built. The supply of sites for the next five years is what is short, and that shortfall is evidence policy S5 accepts for a well placed village-edge field.

My field is not among the 28 sites. Has the chance gone?

Not necessarily. Comments on the final draft closed in September 2026, but a site next to a town or larger village can still be put forward by application while the shortfall lasts. Our guide to call for sites and local plans explains how that process works.

I own land close to Cromford. Does the World Heritage Site rule it out?

It raises the bar rather than closing the door. Any scheme is judged on its effect on the site's outstanding universal value and setting, so we commission and pay for the heritage assessment before an application goes in.

What happens to an agreement with you if the council is replaced?

The agreement is between you and us, so it carries on. If a new council does take over later, any application or appeal we are running passes to it and continues.

Tell Us About Your Land in Derbyshire Dales

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Derbyshire

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Derbyshire

    Selling land in Derbyshire? Which councils are short of homes, and how the Green Belt and Peak District affect your land. We pay for all the planning.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 49%

    Selling Land in Erewash

    Own land in Erewash? The council built under half the homes it needed and its plan review was withdrawn. We agree a price and pay for all the planning.