Derbyshire council area
Selling Land in Derbyshire Dales
Half of the Derbyshire Dales lies inside the Peak District National Park, so the district council plans only for Matlock, Ashbourne, Wirksworth, Darley Dale and the villages outside it. On that land it scored 90% in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, yet an inspector found it well short of a five-year supply of housing sites, and its replacement local plan has just been through the last public consultation before submission.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
Derbyshire Dales in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
90%
Below 95%: the council must publish an action plan to improve delivery.
Homes built against homes needed
589
of 658 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
December 2017
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Published for consultation
As at August 2026.
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
Which Land the Council Actually Decides
The Park Authority's own guidance is plain: if a property lies outside the park boundary, the application goes to the local council, and Derbyshire Dales is one of nine councils it lists around the park.
Where the council does decide, its 2017 plan ranks every settlement, and the draft policies of March 2026 still name the same market towns and local service centre:
- Market towns: Matlock, Ashbourne and Wirksworth.
- Local service centre: Darley Dale.
- Villages with some facilities: Brailsford, Clifton, Cromford, Darley Bridge, Doveridge, Hulland Ward, Matlock Bath, Middleton, Northwood, Rowsley, Sudbury and Tansley.
- Smaller villages: two further tiers, from Bonsall, Brassington and Kirk Ireton down to infill villages such as Hognaston, Shirley and Yeaveley.
Even outside the boundary, the park is never far from the argument. The March 2026 draft policies expect development on the edge of a settlement to enhance or restore landscape character, with particular regard to the setting and character of the National Park. Which side of the line a field falls on is the first thing we check.
A Delivery Pass, a Land Supply Shortfall
Policy S5 of the August 2026 National Planning Policy Framework allows homes beyond a settlement boundary where there is evidenced unmet need, the land sits physically well with the town or village, and roads, schools and drainage can cope now or through planned works. Below 75% in the Housing Delivery Test, that need is taken as given. At 90%, the Dales must show it another way, and a shortfall in the five-year supply of deliverable sites is precisely the evidence the policy recognises.
What the Clifton Appeal Shows
In October 2024 the council refused 16 houses and two apartments on Clifton Road, citing safety on the A515, harm to the countryside, flooding and the risk of Clifton merging into Ashbourne. The inspector allowed the appeal, pointing to an overwhelming need for housing delivery and the 1.36 year supply, and found the adverse impacts would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
That was decided under the previous framework, but the reasoning carries across: a modest scheme against a village, where objections turn on character rather than a hard constraint, can succeed while the council is short of sites. It does nothing for an isolated field. Inside settlements, policy S4 already favours approval unless the harm would substantially exceed the benefits, whatever the housing numbers.
The Draft Plan and Where the Homes Would Go
Local reporting in April 2026 gave the government's housing figure for the district as 580 homes a year. The council proposed that the National Park take 158 of those, leaving the Dales with 415, with two fallbacks: 523 if the park took only 50, or the existing 284.
The council identified 28 sites for 2,133 homes, and the revised list it put out to consultation in August carries the same totals. The Wolds site has been removed. The spread of what remains is strikingly uneven:
| Place | Sites | Homes |
|---|---|---|
| Ashbourne | 7 | 1,273, including about 700 between the Derby Road roundabout and Wyaston Road, either side of Moor Lane |
| Doveridge | 3 | 243 |
| Tansley | 3 | 211 |
| Middleton by Wirksworth | 2 | 116 |
| Darley Dale | 4 | 104 |
| Brailsford | 2 | 65 |
| Matlock | 3 | 39 |
| Ednaston, Hulland Ward and Northwood | 4 between them | 30, 30 and 22 |
Ashbourne takes well over half, and Matlock very little. A new village, potentially in the south of the district, was once set to take 70% of new housing but has been pushed back to a background option taking shape from 2035, which makes the next plan review as relevant as this one for owners in the south.
What a Scheme Here Has to Pay For
The draft policies set affordable housing at 30%, with 80% of that as social and affordable rent. In the market towns and Darley Dale it starts at major developments, but everywhere else it applies from five homes, so even a small village site carries it. Section 106 and CIL covers how these and other contributions are worked out.
Heritage adds its own layer. The Derwent Valley Mills were inscribed as a World Heritage Site in December 2001, and the adopted plan describes the site running along the valley from Cromford in the north to Whatstandwell in the south. The draft plan asks development to conserve and enhance its outstanding universal value.
The draft flood policy supports development that avoids areas of current or future flood risk and does not increase the risk elsewhere. We allow for all of this when we agree a price with you, and none of the cost falls on you.
Land We Look for in the Derbyshire Dales
- Fields of 2 acres or more on the edge of Ashbourne, Matlock, Wirksworth or Darley Dale, outside the park boundary.
- Land that sits well against Doveridge, Brailsford, Hulland Ward, Tansley or Middleton.
- Sites with a safe access onto a road, which the council tested hard on the A515 at Clifton.
- Former quarry land near a settlement, of the kind the 2017 plan allocated at Darley Dale, Matlock and Wirksworth.
- Plots inside a settlement boundary, under policy S4.
- Larger holdings in the south of the district, where the council has pointed its longer term thinking.
Land inside the park, or beside the mills at Cromford, faces narrower prospects, and we will say so plainly. Farmers can read more on our farmland page.
Questions From Landowners in the Derbyshire Dales
My land is inside the National Park. Will Derbyshire Dales District Council decide an application?
No. Inside the park boundary the Peak District National Park Authority decides. Its draft plan allocates no housing sites, and its affordable homes go to people with at least ten years' connection to the area or an adjoining parish, widened in stages if nobody qualifies.
The council scored 90%. Does that mean it has enough housing sites?
No. The score measures homes already built. The supply of sites for the next five years is what is short, and that shortfall is evidence policy S5 accepts for a well placed village-edge field.
My field is not among the 28 sites. Has the chance gone?
Not necessarily. Comments on the final draft closed in September 2026, but a site next to a town or larger village can still be put forward by application while the shortfall lasts. Our guide to call for sites and local plans explains how that process works.
I own land close to Cromford. Does the World Heritage Site rule it out?
It raises the bar rather than closing the door. Any scheme is judged on its effect on the site's outstanding universal value and setting, so we commission and pay for the heritage assessment before an application goes in.
What happens to an agreement with you if the council is replaced?
The agreement is between you and us, so it carries on. If a new council does take over later, any application or appeal we are running passes to it and continues.
Tell Us About Your Land in Derbyshire Dales
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.
More in Derbyshire
County overview
Selling Land in Derbyshire
Selling land in Derbyshire? Which councils are short of homes, and how the Green Belt and Peak District affect your land. We pay for all the planning.
Housing Delivery Test: 49%
Selling Land in Erewash
Own land in Erewash? The council built under half the homes it needed and its plan review was withdrawn. We agree a price and pay for all the planning.
Sources
- Derbyshire Dales District Council: Local Plan 2017 information and adoption
- Derbyshire Dales District Council: Local Plan 2013 to 2033, adopted December 2017 (full plan, copy hosted by Save Matlock Forest)
- Derbyshire Dales District Council: Local Development Scheme 2023 to 2026
- Derbyshire Dales District Council: Planning policy and Local Plan
- Derbyshire Dales District Council: Local Plan draft policies, Appendix 1 (March 2026, hosted by Darley Dale Town Council)
- Derbyshire Times: Council puts revised Local Plan for housing sites out to public consultation (July 2026)
- Derbyshire Times: Potential sites for thousands of new homes in Derbyshire revealed (April 2026)
- Derbyshire Times: Inspector approves rural homes at Clifton rejected by the council (November 2025)
- Derbyshire Times: No plans to earmark housing sites in the Peak District (September 2026)
- Derbyshire Times: Derbyshire councils afforded more leeway to approve housing schemes (August 2026)
- Peak District National Park Authority: Local councils
- High Peak Borough Council: Local government reorganisation (September 2026)
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.