Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Nottinghamshire council area

Selling Land in Newark and Sherwood

Newark and Sherwood builds well above the delivery test, yet it cannot show five years of housing land, because the government's higher housing figure now applies to a Core Strategy from 2019. An inspector found the council's allocations plan sound, subject to main modifications, in August 2026 while accepting that it will not close that gap, so for land on the edge of Newark, Southwell, the Sherwood towns and the larger villages, the months before a new plan are worth a close look.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Newark, Southwell and the Sherwood Towns

Newark and Sherwood District Council, based at Castle House in Newark, covers about 651 square kilometres and close to 128,000 people. Newark, with Balderton and Fernwood, forms the main urban area, and the council's offices stand beside Newark Castle station. The district sits on the A1 and A46 corridors, which its own profile credits with drawing logistics and distribution. Beyond the town lie the town of Southwell and the Sherwood towns of Ollerton, Boughton, Edwinstowe, Clipstone and Rainworth, and much of the district falls within the historic extent of Sherwood Forest.

  • A Core Strategy from March 2019. The Amended Core Strategy directs 60% of growth to the Newark urban area, 30% to the five Service Centres and 10% to the Principal Villages, with at least 9,080 homes from 2013 to 2033.
  • Strong delivery. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 records 1,871 homes built against 1,345 needed over April 2022 to March 2025, a result of 139%.
  • Short of five years. The council's latest statement shows 3.84 years from 1 April 2025, measured against the government's standard method.
  • An allocations plan found sound. The inspector's report on the Amended Allocations and Development Management plan came out on 6 August 2026, and the council set formal adoption for its Full Council meeting of 20 October 2026. The plan redraws urban boundaries and village envelopes but adds no new housing sites.
  • A new local plan under way. The council is preparing a replacement plan it expects to adopt in 2029.

Put plainly, this is a district that builds well against the old measure but falls short against the new one. That gap is what matters most to a landowner here.

Newark and Sherwood in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    139%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Five-year housing land supply

    3.84 years

    Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Position at 1 April 2025, measured against the standard method, 691 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer. Stated by Newark and Sherwood District Council.

    Checked source
  • Homes built against homes needed

    1,871

    of 1,345 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    March 2019

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    Allocations plan found sound subject to main modifications on 6 August 2026, adoption scheduled for 20 October 2026; new Local Plan started

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

How 5.82 Years Became 3.84 Years

Newark and Sherwood's supply position has swung sharply in the past two years, and almost all of it comes from the measuring stick rather than from what is being built. The council's own statements tell the story:

Sources: Newark and Sherwood District Council five-year housing land supply statements for 1 April 2024, the interim update, and 1 April 2025.
StatementYearly figure usedSupply stated
1 April 2024 (June 2024)437 homes, the standard method before December 2024, with no buffer5.82 years
1 April 2024, interim update after the December 2024 framework707 homes plus a 5% buffer, 742 a year3.43 years
1 April 2025 (February 2026)691 homes plus a 5% buffer3.84 years

The latest statement, published in February 2026, explains why it uses the standard method: the Amended Core Strategy was adopted in March 2019 and is now more than five years old. Its calculation runs like this:

Source: Newark and Sherwood District Council, Statement of Five Year Housing Land Supply at 1 April 2025 (February 2026).
Part of the calculationCouncil's figure
Local housing need, standard method691 homes a year, 3,455 over five years
Buffer5%
Five-year requirement with buffer3,628 homes
Permissions on allocated sites1,848 homes
Permissions on large unallocated sites344 homes
Permissions on sites of 5 to 9 homes172 homes
Permissions on sites of 1 to 4 homes231 homes
Specialist accommodation9 homes
Windfall allowance, years four and five180 homes
Deliverable supply2,784 homes
Result3.84 years

Two Need Figures, One Conclusion

The statement uses 691 homes a year, the figure at its base date. The council's scoping document for the new plan, published in June 2026, gives a later figure of 697 a year, or 13,940 over a 20-year plan. The difference most likely reflects the government updating the data behind the method. For a landowner it changes little: on either figure the supply falls short, whereas measured against the Core Strategy's 454 a year the same homes would have cleared five years.

Building Steadily, but Below the New Yardstick

The same statement sets out net completions year by year. Over the twelve years since 2013/14 the district has averaged 562 net homes a year. The most recent five years were stronger:

Source: Statement of Five Year Housing Land Supply at 1 April 2025, Table 1.
YearNet completions
2020/21767
2021/22807
2022/23588
2023/24629
2024/25563

That record comfortably beats the lower requirement the delivery test uses, which is why the result is 139%. Against 691 a year it looks different: none of the last three years reached it.

The supply also leans on a few large sites. Land north and east of Fernwood is expected to provide 515 homes in the five years and Fernwood Meadows South another 175, while Bowbridge Lane, part of Land South of Newark, adds 50 and Thoresby Colliery just 6. Land East of Newark, a strategic allocation with capacity for 1,000 homes, contributes none of them within the five years. The statement also warns that once the allocated sites are built, windfall development will make up a steadily growing share of supply.

Where the Shortfall Helps, and the Green Belt Flank

In the August 2026 framework, policy S5 counts a council's missing years of land as evidence that need is going unmet. That opens an argument rather than granting a permission. A field outside the boundary still needs a sound physical link to the settlement it adjoins, with roads, school places and drainage able to take the extra homes, and any harm is weighed against what the scheme brings. The Core Strategy's own tests still count for something too: Spatial Policy 3 judges schemes in the smaller villages on location, scale, need, impact and character, and keeps the open countryside strictly controlled.

The district splits into two planning landscapes. The scoping document records that the Nottingham and Derby Green Belt runs down the district's western flank from the Trent up to Rainworth. There, S5 does not apply. The Core Strategy focuses Green Belt growth on Blidworth and Lowdham, with Gunthorpe and the part of Bulcote next to Burton Joyce, and homes on other Green Belt land need it to be grey belt, previously developed or released through the new plan. For grey belt housing, the supply shortfall helps meet the need test, and larger schemes then have to meet the Golden Rules, which cover affordable housing, infrastructure and green space. Our guide to grey belt land sets out how a parcel is judged.

  1. Around Newark, Balderton and Fernwood. The top of the settlement order and outside the Green Belt, so a well related edge-of-town site is where S5 has the most reach. Flooding is the limit: the district profile records that Flood Zone 3 takes most of the land around the River Trent. The allocations plan also keeps the long-standing open breaks between Newark and Farndon, Winthorpe and Coddington, where development is not normally allowed.
  2. Southwell and the Sherwood Service Centres. Southwell, Ollerton and Boughton, Edwinstowe, Clipstone and Rainworth take 30% of planned growth between them. The scoping document treats Birklands and Bilhaugh and the wider Sherwood Forest area as particularly sensitive, naming air pollution, recreational pressure and effects on nightjar and woodlark habitats as risks that call for a precautionary approach.
  3. Principal Villages. Collingham, Sutton-on-Trent, Farnsfield and Bilsthorpe are not among the Green Belt villages the Core Strategy names, while Lowdham and Blidworth are. Each has its own envelope, and several have neighbourhood plans.
  4. Inside an envelope. Plots and gaps within an urban boundary or village envelope sit under policy S4, which starts from approval, with refusal reserved for cases where the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.

An Allocations Plan Found Sound Without Five Years

The Amended Allocations and Development Management plan updates the 2013 allocations document. It was submitted in January 2024 and examined by an inspector, Hayden Baugh-Jones, at hearings in November 2024, with the main modifications consulted on from September to October 2025. Under the transitional arrangements it was examined against the September 2023 version of the national framework. The inspector's report of 6 August 2026 concludes that, with the main modifications it recommends, the plan is sound, and it is frank about housing. It notes that the Core Strategy passed its fifth anniversary in 2024, so supply is measured against the standard method: 691 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer of 35, or 3,628 over five years. The 2,784 deliverable homes fall short of that. The report then concludes that on adoption the plan will not provide a five-year supply, a situation it calls "far from ideal" but not a reason to find the plan unsound. It points to the four strategic sites the Core Strategy already allocates, the new local plan the council has started and expects to adopt in 2029, and a flexible approach under policies DM1 and DM2 that lets further housing sites come forward, alongside the Core Strategy's criteria for rural development.

The plan matters to landowners for four reasons:

  • New lines on the map. It sets out amended urban boundaries and village envelopes, along with areas to be protected from development. Whether a field falls inside or outside a redrawn envelope decides whether S4 or S5 is the starting point.
  • No new housing sites. The supply statement confirms the plan adds no new housing allocations, so the gap has to be met by applications and by the next plan.
  • Site-level changes. Allocations that have been built out, such as sites in Collingham, Sutton-on-Trent and Southwell, are deleted. The inspector reverted the Southwell depot site to 15 homes over highway constraints, and recorded Petersmith Drive in Ollerton as under construction with permission for 305 homes. The affordable housing target stays at 30%, applied where a scheme has at least ten homes or its site covers at least 0.5 hectares.
  • Gypsy and Traveller sites. The plan adds new Gypsy, Roma and Traveller policies and allocations. Against a need for 169 pitches from 2019 to 2033/34, the council has identified 145 to 157, which the inspector accepted because it exceeds the requirement for the first five years and the five after. The Old Stable Yard allocation north of Winthorpe Road is deleted, and the 76 pitches planned at Tolney Lane depend on a flood alleviation scheme coming first, since the Environment Agency does not support more permanent pitches there until one is in place.

The council's examination page for the plan set formal adoption for the Full Council meeting of 20 October 2026. Whenever it takes effect, the inspector's own finding is that adoption does not restore a five-year supply.

The Land We Look for in Newark and Sherwood

  • Land adjoining the urban boundary of Newark, Balderton or Fernwood, above the Trent flood plain.
  • Fields on the edge of Southwell, Ollerton and Boughton, Edwinstowe, Clipstone or Rainworth.
  • Land against the envelopes of Collingham, Sutton-on-Trent, Farnsfield or Bilsthorpe.
  • Green Belt parcels near Lowdham, Blidworth or Gunthorpe that are hemmed in by roads or buildings, already developed, or of little Green Belt value.
  • Paddocks, yards and gaps inside a village envelope.
  • Larger holdings that could form part of an allocation in the new plan.

Where supply is short, a well prepared application can often run alongside putting land forward for the new plan, and choosing between them is the first thing our review settles. The option we offer sets the price on day one, higher than the land's present value. Surveys, reports and the application itself are all paid by us, and we also contribute to the fees of whichever solicitor and land agent you pick, so having your side handled well is free to you. A paddock or a single field can be just as worthwhile, and our page on paddocks and small sites explains.

After the Allocations Plan, a New Plan for 2029

A New Plan and a Residual Need of 7,234 Homes

The council's district profile for the new plan sets 13,940 homes over 20 years against 7,535 homes with planning permission at April 2025. After an 11% allowance for permissions that lapse, it leaves a residual need of at least 7,234 homes to be found. The scoping document says the council believes it should develop a different spatial strategy from the current one, which sends most growth to the Newark urban area, and it records 196 sites put forward in the 2025 call for sites. It reopened the call alongside scoping, with submissions taken until 30 July 2026.

A Timetable Being Reset

The scoping document set out these stages:

From the Newark and Sherwood Local Plan scoping document (June 2026) and the council's new local plan page. Dates are the council's and are being revised.
StageCouncil's timetable (June 2026)
Scoping consultationJuly 2026
Gateway 1September 2026, now delayed to the end of October 2026
Consultation on proposed plan content and evidenceJune to July 2027
Gateway 2November to December 2027
Consultation on the proposed local planMarch to April 2028
Gateway 3July 2028
ExaminationSeptember 2028 to March 2029
AdoptionApril 2029

The council's new local plan page explains that, with reorganisation paused and district elections now set for May 2027, Gateway 1 has moved to the end of October 2026. The council scheduled a report on Gateway 1, with an amended timetable, for its Cabinet meeting of 13 October 2026, so that consultations do not fall straight after new councillors take office. The later dates in the table are expected to move with it.

The Next Supply Statement and Delivery Test

The statement for 1 April 2025 appeared in February 2026, so one based on 1 April 2026 may take a similar time. It will show whether completions and new permissions have narrowed the gap against a need of close to 700 a year. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026; at 139%, the council is far from any of its consequences, so the delivery test is not what drives land decisions here.

What This Means for Timing

The period between the allocations plan's adoption and the new plan's adoption is when the supply shortfall does most work, since the council has no new allocations to point to. For well placed land outside the Green Belt, that argues for preparing an application now while also putting the land forward for the new plan. How long each route usually takes is set out in our guide on how long planning takes.

Questions About Land in Newark and Sherwood

The council builds more homes than its target. Why can it not show five years of land?

Because the target changed. Its Core Strategy is more than five years old, so supply is measured against the standard method of around 690 to 700 homes a year rather than the plan's 454, and the supply of permitted sites has not caught up.

My field sits just outside a village envelope. Will the new allocations plan change that?

It might. The Amended Allocations and Development Management plan, found sound in August 2026, redraws urban boundaries and village envelopes, so the first step is to check your land against its policies map rather than the 2013 one. Outside the envelope, the supply shortfall is evidence to weigh under S5.

I put land into the 2025 call for sites. Is that enough?

It keeps the land among the 196 sites in view, but the council will judge each on evidence. Work on access, drainage, ecology and flood risk helps most before the consultation on plan content, which the June 2026 timetable placed in June to July 2027, and on land we agree to take on, that cost is ours.

My land near Lowdham is in the Green Belt. Does the shortfall help?

Not through S5, which does not apply in the Green Belt. It can support a grey belt case on a parcel that does little for the Green Belt's purposes, and a larger scheme there then has to satisfy the Golden Rules.

Land East of Newark has room for 1,000 homes but none are counted in the five-year supply. Does that matter to me?

It helps explain the shortfall. While a large allocation adds nothing to the five-year count, the gap has to be filled from elsewhere, which is part of why well placed land around the Newark urban area and the Service Centres deserves a look now. How we look at the wider county is on our Nottinghamshire page.

Tell Us About Your Land in Newark and Sherwood

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Nottinghamshire

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Nottinghamshire

    Selling land across Nottinghamshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 93%

    Selling Land in Ashfield

    Selling land in Ashfield? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 357%

    Selling Land in Bassetlaw

    Selling land in Bassetlaw? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 109%

    Selling Land in Broxtowe

    Selling land in Broxtowe? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 125%

    Selling Land in Gedling

    Selling land in Gedling? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 134%

    Selling Land in Mansfield

    Selling land in Mansfield? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 172%

    Selling Land in Rushcliffe

    Selling land in Rushcliffe? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.