Nottinghamshire council area
Selling Land in Mansfield
Mansfield's local plan turned five on 8 September 2025, and the yardstick for its housing land moved from the plan's 325 homes a year to the government's 493. The council still shows 6.59 years of supply, so most new sites here will be settled by its Local Plan Review to 2043, which it aims to submit for examination by 31 December 2026.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
A Former Coalfield District With No Green Belt
Mansfield District Council is led by a publicly elected mayor. The district had about 110,500 people at the 2021 census, and most of them live in the town itself, which takes in Mansfield Woodhouse, Forest Town, Berry Hill, Ladybrook and part of Pleasley. To the north lies Warsop parish, with Market Warsop, Church Warsop, Meden Vale, Warsop Vale and Spion Kop. Coal mining was the main local industry for most of the twentieth century, and the Robin Hood line, opened in 1995, connects the town with Nottingham and Worksop.
- Ahead on delivery. The council built 1,067 homes against a requirement of 795 in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, a result of 134%.
- A plan now 6 years old. The Mansfield District Local Plan 2013 to 2033, adopted in September 2020, asks for at least 6,500 homes, 90% of them in the Mansfield urban area and 10% in Warsop parish.
- Above five years, for now. The council's latest statement finds 6.59 years of deliverable housing land from 1 April 2025, though its own officers describe the supply as marginal.
- Countryside, not Green Belt. The adopted plan defines no Green Belt. Land beyond the settlement boundaries shown on its policies map is simply countryside.
- A review at its final stage. On 15 September 2026 cabinet recommended a publication draft of the plan to 2043 for approval, and full council was due to consider it on 24 September 2026.
Put together, this is a council with no shortage for an application to lean on and a plan review close to its last public stage. What decides most fields is whether the review picks them, and after that the capacity of the roads and the distance to Sherwood's protected woods and heaths.
Mansfield in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
134%
Meeting its housing requirement.
Five-year housing land supply
6.59 years
Five years or more of deliverable housing land. Position at 1 April 2025, measured against the standard method, 493 homes a year from September 2025 (the adopted plan figure of 325 a year for the five months before), plus a 5% buffer. Stated by Mansfield District Council.
Checked sourceHomes built against homes needed
1,067
of 795 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
September 2020
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Updated
Local Plan Review publication draft recommended by Cabinet 15 September 2026; submission due by 31 December 2026
Checked source
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
Above Five Years, Even on the Government's Figure
Because the plan was adopted on 8 September 2020, national policy stopped measuring Mansfield's supply against it once it turned five. The council's Housing Monitoring Report 2025, September update applies the switch mid-year, counting five months at the plan's rate and the rest at the standard method:
| Part of the calculation | Council's figure |
|---|---|
| April to August 2025, at the plan's 325 a year | 135.5 homes |
| September 2025 to March 2026, at the standard method's 493 a year | 287.7 homes |
| April 2026 to March 2030, four years at 493 | 1,972 homes |
| Total for the five years | 2,395 homes |
| Buffer | 5%, or 119.8 homes |
| Five-year requirement | 2,515 homes |
| Deliverable supply | 3,315 homes |
| Result | 6.59 years |
The margin is about 800 homes above the requirement. No shortfall was added, because the council built 4,240 homes from 2013 to March 2025 against 3,900 required over those years, 340 ahead. The buffer is 5%, the lowest national policy allows, which the statement ties to the council's delivery test result.
The council does not treat that margin as comfortable. Its cabinet report on the publication draft, dated 15 September 2026, refers to "a marginal five-year housing land supply" and warns that any delay to the plan is likely to increase the risk of housing applications being decided at appeal, because the current plan is out of date.
Where the Supply Comes From
- Allocations, commitments and the strategic urban extensions: 2,578 of the 3,315 homes.
- Larger sites of ten or more homes with permission: 574, of which 370 were under construction.
- Small sites of up to nine homes with permission: 163.
So the supply leans heavily on land the 2020 plan already chose, from its housing allocations to its strategic urban extensions. Completions have also dipped: 297 homes in 2024/25, the lowest year since 2017/18.
What This Means for a Field Outside a Boundary
Under policy S5 of the August 2026 framework, homes past a settlement edge can be supported where there is evidence that housing need is going unmet, as long as the site reads as part of the place beside it and local roads, schools and drainage have room. Mansfield has no Green Belt, so in principle that route could reach any edge in the district. The evidence normally comes from one of two places, a delivery score under 75% or a five-year supply that falls short, and Mansfield offers neither at present. Without it, the adopted plan's policy S3 governs the countryside, and it lists a narrow set of acceptable uses, such as farming, the reuse of buildings and business expansion, none of them general housing.
An older appeal shows how hard edge sites can be here even with the balance tilted towards approval. At land south of Peafield Lane, Mansfield Woodhouse, an inspector dismissed up to 240 homes in November 2019, before the current plan was adopted. The inspector found the most important policies out of date, which engaged the presumption in favour of development, yet gave "extremely substantial weight" to harm to highway safety and the free flow of traffic, and moderate weight to the loss of open countryside. Traffic evidence, agreed with the county highways team before an application, matters in Mansfield as much as the housing numbers.
The Review: 9,900 Homes to 2043
The Local Plan Review runs from 2023 to 2043, replacing the adopted plan's 325 homes a year with a need of 495, worked out by the government's standard method. The three strategic urban extensions of the 2020 plan, at Pleasley Hill Farm, Jubilee Way and Berry Hill, carry over into it. The council's companion document to the publication draft, dated September 2026, sets out how that need is met:
| Source of homes, 2023 to 2043 | Homes |
|---|---|
| Built since 2023 | 687 |
| Existing permissions | 2,447 |
| Allocations carried over from the adopted plan | 3,588 |
| Brownfield allocations | 919 |
| Windfall allowance | 720 |
| Subtotal | 8,361 |
| New allocations needed, at least | 2,034 |
| Total, the 9,900 need plus a 5% buffer | 10,395 |
About four fifths of the total is already spoken for. The new land the review has to find is at least 2,034 homes over twenty years, and the cabinet report says the sites in the publication draft provide for approximately 10,800 homes in all, a buffer above the 9,900 need to allow for sites that stall. The same report plans for 41.06 hectares of employment land. Competition for the new allocations is stiff. As the first draft was prepared for consultation in 2025, officers told councillors that the land availability assessment had identified 223 sites, and that 159 of them met the criteria for further testing, with room for about 16,000 homes between them.
From Draft to Publication
The review has already been consulted on twice, from August to October 2023 and as a draft plan from 30 May to 17 July 2025. The publication draft is the council's final position before examination. The council's overview and scrutiny committee endorsed it on 1 September 2026 without recommending changes, and on 15 September 2026 cabinet recommended it for approval by full council, by three votes to one, noting that the comments received would be submitted with it. Full council was due to consider it on 24 September 2026, and once approved the draft is published for comment over at least six weeks. Comments go to the inspector rather than back into another draft, so a site left out now has to make its case on soundness. Because the review is being prepared under the transitional arrangements for the old plan-making system, it will be examined against the March 2025 version of the national framework, not the one published in August 2026.
Sherwood's Protected Woods and Heaths
Two protected sites in Sherwood Forest shape what can be built in Mansfield. The council's Habitats Regulations Assessment of August 2026 tests the review against the Birklands and Bilhaugh Special Area of Conservation and the Sherwood Forest possible potential Special Protection Area for nightjar and woodlark. The bird area has no formal status, but Natural England advises a risk-based approach, and the assessment treats it with the same care as a designated site.
- 400 metres. Homes this close to the bird area are assessed for the risk of urbanisation effects.
- 8.9 kilometres. A survey of walkers and dog walkers who visit at least once a month set the zone of influence for recreational pressure on the Special Area of Conservation at this distance from home.
- 200 metres from roads. Nitrogen deposition from traffic is considered within this band.
The assessment concludes that these effects can be handled through the plan's policies and standard measures: access and habitat management, and contributions under section 106 towards alternative natural green space. It also recommends that any change in the bird area's status should trigger a review of the plan. For a larger holding within reach of these sites, that makes open space more than a design choice. Setting part of the land aside as a walking route or green space can be what allows homes on the rest.
Where Land in Mansfield Can Still Come Forward
With the supply above five years and no Green Belt, the routes here differ from those around Nottingham. In practice there are five:
- Through the review. Land in the plan, whether carried over or newly allocated, has the clearest path. Land left out can be argued for at the publication stage, with evidence on access, drainage, ecology and landscape.
- Inside the settlement boundaries. Gaps, yards and larger gardens within Mansfield, Mansfield Woodhouse, Forest Town or Market Warsop fall under policy S4 of the national framework. It starts from support, and a refusal needs harms that would substantially outweigh what the scheme offers.
- Previously developed land. The review counts 919 homes on brownfield allocations, and a former depot or works yard in the urban area is judged on its own merits whatever the supply. Our brownfield and yards page covers the sites we look at.
- Small sites in Warsop parish. The adopted plan aims a tenth of the district's growth at Warsop parish, so modest plots against Market Warsop or the villages can suit smaller schemes, as described on our paddocks and small sites page.
- The next review. The council keeps its land availability assessment form open, so land not yet in the frame can be put forward for the plan that follows.
Grey belt, which does so much work around Nottingham, does not arise here, because there is no Green Belt to assess. The call for sites and local plans guide explains how a site moves from submission to allocation.
The Land We Look for in Mansfield
- Land put to the council's land availability assessment, whether or not the publication draft allocates it.
- Fields adjoining the Mansfield urban area with a road frontage and a credible access, backed by traffic evidence.
- Yards, depots and other previously developed land within Mansfield, Mansfield Woodhouse, Forest Town or Pleasley.
- Plots and paddocks against Market Warsop, Church Warsop or Meden Vale.
- Larger holdings near Sherwood that can set land aside as green space as well as carry homes.
- Sites within walking distance of a station on the Robin Hood line.
Where a site needs traffic modelling, ecology or a case put to the inspector, we commission that work and meet its full cost. The option price is agreed on day one, above the land's present value, and your fields stay in use until the sale completes. We also put money towards your solicitor and land agent, so having it done properly costs you nothing. If permission never comes, the land remains yours and nothing is owed. The stages are laid out on our how it works page.
Mansfield Between Publication and a December Submission
The Publication Consultation
The council's draft Local Development Scheme for 2026, which went to cabinet with the publication draft on 15 September 2026, places the publication stage in September to November 2026, with the timetable after that as follows:
| Stage | Council's timetable |
|---|---|
| Publication consultation (Regulation 19) | September to November 2026 |
| Submission for examination | December 2026 |
| Examination | January to September 2027 |
| Inspector's report | October 2027 |
| Adoption | December 2027 |
Submission matters most. A plan prepared under the old system must reach the government by 31 December 2026. Cabinet amended its recommendation at the meeting: the plan and the comments on it are to be submitted by that date unless the outcome of a legal case involving Oxford City Council is known and requires otherwise, and if that outcome is still unknown, the plan comes back to full council for approval before submission in December. The draft scheme is plain about the stakes: if the December 2026 deadline is missed, the work so far would be reissued under the new plan-making system, and consultation would likely need to be repeated. Officers told cabinet that moving to the new system would put adoption back to July 2029 at the earliest.
The Next Supply Statement
The council reports its supply each year in its housing monitoring report. The statement at 1 April 2025 counted five months at the plan's old rate; the next will measure all five years against the standard method. We make no forecast, but for a council above five years that is the figure to watch. If the review is adopted, its own figure of 495 a year becomes the measure instead.
The Next Delivery Test
The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026, and a new edition follows each year. At 134%, nothing in the test bites on Mansfield. For reference, an action plan starts at under 95%, the 20% buffer at under 85%, and at under 75% policy S5 would count unmet need as shown. The dip to 297 completions in 2024/25 is inside the latest measurement already, so the next edition will turn partly on how 2025/26 compares with the year it replaces.
Reorganisation on Hold
Cabinet was told that the publication draft had been drafted before the government announced that local government reorganisation was paused. The minute records the uncertainty that leaves: whether a plan made under the new system, which could not be adopted before July 2029, would be adopted by Mansfield District Council or by a proposed new Nottinghamshire unitary council. It links that uncertainty to wasted work and a longer spell without a valid plan if the council delayed, and cabinet backed pressing on under the current rules. For now, Mansfield District Council remains the body taking the review to examination.
Who Decides Applications From 31 October 2026
National reforms also change how Mansfield decides applications. Full council was due on 24 September 2026 to adopt changes to its constitution, effective from 31 October 2026, that bring in the national scheme of delegation, which new regulations require by that date. Minor housing schemes of one to nine homes on sites under half a hectare will always be decided by officers. Larger applications go to the 11-member planning applications committee only where a nominated officer and the committee's chair or vice chair both agree that the scheme raises an issue of significance to the local area or a significant planning matter, and councillors lose the right to call applications in. The report adds that a scheme broadly in line with a detailed site allocation and national policy is unlikely to raise such a matter, which makes a place in the review worth more still.
What This Means for Timing
- Land in the publication draft can be prepared for an application now, so it is ready soon after adoption.
- Land left out has its best chance in a well evidenced response during the publication consultation, which the council's draft timetable places between September and November 2026.
- Sites inside the towns and brownfield land do not depend on the review and can be looked at straight away.
For a sense of the months involved at each step, see how long planning takes.
Questions About Land in Mansfield
My land was put into the council's land availability assessment. Will it be allocated?
Not necessarily. The assessment is evidence, not a decision, and 159 sites were taken forward for testing against a need for roughly 2,000 new homes. The publication draft shows which were chosen. If yours was not, the publication consultation is the place to argue it.
The council has more than five years of land. Can I still apply on a field next to Mansfield Woodhouse?
It is difficult today. Without a shortfall or a low delivery result, the national S5 route lacks its main support, and the adopted plan restricts housing in the countryside. The Peafield Lane appeal also shows how much weight highway safety carries here. Most edge land is better placed through the review.
My land is close to Sherwood Forest. Is it ruled out?
Not by distance alone. Homes within 400 metres of the Sherwood bird area face the closest scrutiny. Further out, the question is usually how recreational pressure is handled, often through green space on part of the site or a contribution towards it.
What happens if the council misses the December 2026 deadline?
Its draft 2026 timetable says the work would be reissued under the new plan-making system, probably with consultation repeated, and officers put the earliest adoption under that system at July 2029. Sites in the current draft would then wait longer for allocation.
I have a small paddock in Warsop parish. Is it worth asking about?
Yes. The adopted plan sends a tenth of the district's growth to Warsop parish, and smaller sites against Market Warsop, Church Warsop or Meden Vale can suit modest schemes. More on the rest of the county is on our Nottinghamshire page.
Tell Us About Your Land in Mansfield
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.
More in Nottinghamshire
County overview
Selling Land in Nottinghamshire
Selling land across Nottinghamshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 93%
Selling Land in Ashfield
Selling land in Ashfield? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 357%
Selling Land in Bassetlaw
Selling land in Bassetlaw? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 109%
Selling Land in Broxtowe
Selling land in Broxtowe? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 125%
Selling Land in Gedling
Selling land in Gedling? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 139%
Selling Land in Newark and Sherwood
Selling land in Newark and Sherwood? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 172%
Selling Land in Rushcliffe
Selling land in Rushcliffe? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Sources
- Mansfield District Council: Housing Monitoring Report 2025, September update (November 2025)
- Mansfield District Council: Mansfield District Local Plan 2013 to 2033 (adopted September 2020)
- Mansfield District Council: Regulation 19 Local Plan Review companion document (September 2026)
- Mansfield District Council: Local Plan Review Regulation 18 consultation, Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Place), 29 April 2025
- Mansfield District Council: Extract minute from Cabinet, Local Plan Review Regulation 19 publication draft (15 September 2026)
- Mansfield District Council: Local Plan Review Regulation 19 Publication Draft, report to Cabinet (September 2026)
- Mansfield District Council: Draft Local Development Scheme (September 2026)
- Mansfield District Council: Planning Constitutional Changes, report and revised committee terms of reference (September 2026)
- Mansfield District Council: Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Local Plan Review (August 2026)
- Mansfield District Council: Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA)
- Planning Inspectorate: Appeal decision APP/X3025/W/19/3230027, land south of Peafield Lane, Mansfield Woodhouse (15 November 2019)
- Wikipedia: Mansfield
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.