Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Worcestershire council area

Selling Land in Wyre Forest

Wyre Forest shares its name with the woodland near Bewdley that is now a national nature reserve, and most of its recent homes have gone onto previously developed land. With 8.8 years of housing land and a plan adopted in April 2022, the council is comfortable today, but the new plan it has just begun starts from a need for at least 584 homes a year, more than double the current target.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Three Towns, a Forest and the Severn Valley Line

Wyre Forest District Council covers Kidderminster, Stourport-on-Severn and Bewdley, and villages such as Blakedown, Cookley, Wolverley, Chaddesley Corbett, Far Forest, Clows Top and Upper Arley. The council's settlement hierarchy paper ranks Kidderminster, with around 56,200 people, as the district's strategic centre, Stourport as a large market town of about 20,500 and Bewdley as a small market town of about 9,000.

  • An ancient forest. The Wyre Forest National Nature Reserve covers 1,455 hectares near Bewdley, managed by Natural England, Forestry England and Worcestershire Wildlife Trust, and holds England's largest colony of pearl-bordered fritillary butterflies.
  • Three kinds of station. Kidderminster has a main line station, Blakedown is the only village in the district with one, and the heritage Severn Valley Railway stops at Bewdley and near Upper Arley.
  • A plan from 2022. The Wyre Forest District Local Plan 2016 to 2036 was adopted in April 2022.
  • Delivery far ahead of target. The district built 1,421 homes against a requirement of 671 in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, a result of 212%.

On every national measure the district is doing what is asked of it. What makes it interesting for landowners is what comes next.

Wyre Forest in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    212%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Five-year housing land supply

    8.8 years

    Five years or more of deliverable housing land. Position at 1 April 2026, measured against the adopted Local Plan requirement of 276 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer and an allowance for care accommodation. Stated by Wyre Forest District Council.

    Checked source
  • Homes built against homes needed

    1,421

    of 671 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    April 2022

    The plan currently used to decide applications.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    New plan: issues consultation closed 28 September 2026; consultation on proposed content January to February 2027

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

A Healthy Supply, Measured Against 276 Homes a Year

The council's five-year supply report covers 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2031. Because the plan is less than five years old, it tests supply against the plan's own requirement, set in policy SP1:

Source: Wyre Forest District Council, Five year housing land supply report at April 2026.
Part of the calculationCouncil's figure
Yearly requirement276 homes, from policy SP1 of the adopted plan
Buffer5%, because delivery was well above target
Allowance for care accommodation64 dwelling equivalents added to the requirement
Five-year requirement1,513 homes
Deliverable supply, including care accommodation2,663 homes
Result8.8 years

A year earlier the council's Authority Monitoring Report gave 9.3 years at 1 April 2025, so the margin has narrowed a little but remains wide.

Two Delivery Figures, Both High

The supply report justifies its 5% buffer with the three years 2020/21 to 2022/23, when the district delivered 1,140 homes against a requirement of 615, a score of 185%. The government's Housing Delivery Test 2025, published on 17 August 2026, covers the later period of April 2022 to March 2025 and gives 212%. On delivery alone, either edition earns the lowest buffer.

The 20% Buffer Rule From July 2026

A newer rule also matters. For planning decisions taken since 1 July 2026, national policy asks for a 20% buffer in any district whose requirement is under five years old, was tested at examination before the December 2024 framework and stands at no more than 80% of the standard method figure. The report quotes the rule but does not say whether it applies. On the face of it Wyre Forest meets all three conditions: its plan dates from April 2022, and 276 is under half of 584. Applying 20% to the council's own figures gives a requirement of 1,720 homes and roughly 7.7 years, still well clear of five.

What This Means for an Application Today

With a result of 212% and supply well above five years, neither of the usual ways of showing unmet need is available here. Policy S5 of the August 2026 framework, the route for well related land beyond a settlement's edge, therefore has little to work with, and it does not apply in the Green Belt in any case. The same absence of evidenced need makes a grey belt case for housing hard to win at present. That is not the end of the story, because the yardstick is about to change.

A District That Builds on Brownfield Land

The monitoring report for 2024/25 records 538 net completions against the annual requirement of 276, with a further 457 homes under construction and 692 not started at 31 March 2025. The pattern is unusual:

  • 95% on previously developed land in 2024/25, and 87% of all completions since the plan period began in 2016.
  • 3,043 homes completed between April 2016 and April 2026, according to the supply report, against a plan average of 276 a year.
  • 199 affordable homes completed in 2024/25, across affordable rent, social rent and shared ownership.
  • Lea Castle. The report notes that all but one of the completions in Wolverley and Cookley that year were at the former Lea Castle Hospital site.

For owners of yards, depots, workshops and former commercial land in and around the three towns, this is the strongest route in the district. Policy S4 supports development within settlements unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits, and in the Green Belt previously developed land is treated differently from open fields. The kinds of site that suit this route are described on our brownfield land and yards page.

Green Belt That Keeps Three Towns Apart

The council's Green Belt review describes the district's Green Belt as part of the West Midlands Green Belt that checks the spread of the Birmingham conurbation, and gives it a local job too: preventing Bewdley, Kidderminster and Stourport from merging with one another. The towns are drawn out of it, as are Cookley, Fairfield, Blakedown and Wilden, while Chaddesley Corbett, Wolverley and Upper Arley are washed over by it. Which of those a piece of land sits in or near decides its route:

  1. Inside the towns and inset villages. Policy S4 applies, and small sites, gardens and backland can be looked at on their merits now.
  2. Previously developed land in the Green Belt. Lawful yards and commercial sites have their own route, which does not depend on the housing numbers. Buildings used for farming do not count.
  3. Washed over villages. National policy allows limited infilling in villages in the Green Belt, which can suit a single plot in Chaddesley Corbett or Wolverley.
  4. Open Green Belt fields. In the gaps between the towns the case is hardest. Elsewhere a field may prove to be grey belt, but for now, as set out above, the new plan is the realistic route. Our grey belt guide sets out the tests.

A New Plan Starting From 584 Homes a Year

Plans must be reviewed at least every five years, and the council has already begun a new one under the government's gateway process. It consulted on the scope of the plan until 7 July 2026, and its timetable placed the first gateway, a self-assessment of readiness, in August or September 2026.

The scoping report states the key number plainly: a new housing requirement of a minimum of 584 homes a year, with the plan period extended beyond 2036. Whatever the final figure, the new plan is likely to need land that is not allocated today.

Two earlier steps shape what comes next:

  • A call for sites ran from 1 October to 24 December 2025 and drew 105 sites, which the council published on a map in July 2026. It stresses that this is a land availability exercise, that appearing on the map does not mean a site is suitable, and that no decisions have been made.
  • A spatial issues and local priorities consultation ran to 28 September 2026. The next stage in the council's timetable is a consultation on proposed plan content and evidence in January and February 2027, where its first thinking on how much land it needs, and where, should appear.

Our guide to call for sites and local plans explains how submitted land is assessed.

The Land We Look for in Wyre Forest

  • Yards, depots, workshops and former industrial land in Kidderminster, Stourport and Bewdley.
  • Old commercial plots, depots or hardstanding out in the Green Belt, where the use is lawful.
  • Fields on the edges of Kidderminster, Stourport and Bewdley that could be put forward to the new plan.
  • Land around the inset villages of Blakedown, Cookley, Fairfield and Wilden, including near Blakedown station.
  • Infill plots in washed over villages such as Chaddesley Corbett and Wolverley.
  • Larger holdings able to carry affordable homes, open space and new infrastructure.

Where land is best suited to the new plan, our work starts well before any consultation, with access, drainage, ecology, landscape and Green Belt evidence, all at our cost. The price is fixed when we sign, set higher than the land is worth today, and we complete once planning permission has been secured. You keep farming or using the land in the meantime. Our how it works page sets out each step.

April 2027: The Plan Turns Five

A New Yardstick for Supply

The adopted plan reaches its fifth anniversary on 26 April 2027. The council's own supply report explains that once strategic policies are more than five years old, supply must be assessed against local housing need under the standard method, and that in Wyre Forest this would effectively double the annual need from 276 to 584 homes. Simple arithmetic shows why the date matters: five years at 584 a year is 2,920 homes before any buffer, more than the 2,663 counted today. We make no forecast, because a new statement will count different sites at a later date, but a result below five years would be evidence of unmet need, to be weighed under policy S5 for well placed land outside the Green Belt, and would usually satisfy the need test for grey belt housing.

The Plan Timetable

From the Wyre Forest emerging local plan timetable. Dates are the council's and may move.
StageCouncil's timetable
Consultation on plan content and evidenceJanuary to February 2027
Gateway 2, Planning Inspectorate adviceApril 2027
Consultation on the proposed planJune to August 2027
Gateway 3March 2028
ExaminationJuly to December 2028
AdoptionJanuary 2029

The Next Delivery Test

At 212% in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, published 17 August 2026, none of the test's consequences reaches Wyre Forest. It would take a fall under 95% to require an action plan, under 85% to lift the buffer to 20% and under 75% to bring S5 into play with no supply argument at all. Next year's edition matters far less here than the plan's birthday.

North Worcestershire, Paused

In July 2026 the government decided that Wyre Forest, Bromsgrove and Redditch would form a North Worcestershire council from April 2028, as the Bromsgrove Standard reported. Since then a national review, launched on 7 September 2026, has frozen the process, which the Redditch Standard reported applies to Worcestershire, and the government has said elections in May 2027 will use existing council areas. With examination set for late 2028, a new council would have inherited the plan. For now the district council runs it.

What This Means for Timing

  • Brownfield sites and land inside the towns can be looked at now, on their own merits.
  • Fields for the new plan need evidence ready for the January 2027 consultation, whether or not they were in the 2025 call for sites.
  • Grey belt and edge-of-town land is worth preparing ahead of April 2027, when the supply test changes.

Questions About Land in Wyre Forest

The council has plenty of housing land. Why would anyone want my field?

Because the new plan must find room for a much higher number. The scoping report starts from at least 584 homes a year against 276 today, and the plan's consultations are where land enters that process.

My land sits in the gap between Kidderminster and Stourport. What are its chances?

That is the hardest place in the district, because keeping the towns apart is one of the Green Belt's main local purposes. We would still look at it, and we will tell you plainly if a plan submission is the only realistic route.

I own a small plot in Wolverley. Is that Green Belt?

Wolverley is washed over by the Green Belt, so the village itself lies within it. National policy allows limited infilling in such villages, and a plot between existing houses can sometimes qualify, so the exact position on the street matters.

Does it matter that my land is near the Wyre Forest reserve?

It can. The reserve is a national nature reserve known for its butterflies and moths, so ecology evidence for nearby land needs care. We commission and pay for the surveys.

I missed the 2025 call for sites. Is it too late?

No. The plan still has to pass through consultations on its content and on the proposed plan, the first timetabled for early 2027. Land can be put forward with evidence at those stages, and a site that arrives well prepared is in a strong position whichever way the supply figure moves.

Tell Us About Your Land in Wyre Forest

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Worcestershire

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Worcestershire

    Selling land across Worcestershire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If planning fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 58%

    Selling Land in Bromsgrove

    Selling land in Bromsgrove? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If planning fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 88%

    Selling Land in Worcester

    Selling land in Worcester? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If planning fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 101%

    Selling Land in Malvern Hills

    Selling land in Malvern Hills? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If planning fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 129%

    Selling Land in Redditch

    Selling land in Redditch? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If planning fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 103%

    Selling Land in Wychavon

    Selling land in Wychavon? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If planning fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.