Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Warwickshire council area

Selling Land in Warwick District

Warwick District sets aside almost half of the homes it expects to build over the next five years for Coventry, which is why a council that passes the Housing Delivery Test comfortably counts only 1.96 years of land for its own needs. Most of its countryside is Green Belt, and the joint South Warwickshire Local Plan now proposes a new community at Hatton and large extensions to Leamington, Kenilworth and the edge of Coventry.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Leamington, Warwick, Kenilworth and a Ring of Green Belt Villages

Warwick District Council is run from Leamington Spa and covers about 283 square kilometres, home to some 148,500 people at the 2021 census. Leamington Spa is the largest town, followed by Warwick, Kenilworth and Whitnash, and the rest is a rural district of parishes such as Bishop's Tachbrook, Cubbington, Barford, Hatton, Stoneleigh and Baginton. Six stations serve it: Leamington Spa, Warwick, Warwick Parkway, Kenilworth, Hatton and Lapworth.

  • Passing the delivery test. A score of 128% in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, from 2,563 homes built where 1,998 were required.
  • A plan running to 2029. The Warwick District Local Plan 2011 to 2029 was adopted in September 2017, so it is now 9 years old.
  • Well short on supply. Its monitoring report puts supply at 1.96 years, measured from 1 April 2025.
  • Mostly Green Belt beyond the towns. In the adopted plan's words, the vast majority of the district's rural area lies within the West Midlands Green Belt.

For a landowner, the two facts that matter most sit side by side: a supply shortfall that gives real weight to new homes, and a Green Belt that decides which land that weight can actually reach.

Warwick District in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    128%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Five-year housing land supply

    1.96 years

    Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Position at 1 April 2025, measured against the standard method, 1,085 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer, with 45% of expected completions set aside for Coventry's unmet need. Stated by Warwick District Council (Authority Monitoring Report 2024/25).

    Checked source
  • Homes built against homes needed

    2,563

    of 1,998 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    September 2017

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Updated

    South Warwickshire Local Plan: final consultation closed 8 September 2026; submission due by 31 December 2026

    Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

The Coventry Share Behind the Supply Figure

The 2017 plan did more than meet the district's own need. Policy DS6 provides for at least 16,776 homes from 2011 to 2029, and 5,976 of those, in the years 2017/18 to 2028/29, are there to meet housing need that Coventry cannot meet inside its own boundary. Since the plan, adopted on 20 September 2017, passed five years old in September 2022, supply has been tested against the government's standard method for the district instead, now 1,085 homes a year. But the council still treats the Coventry homes as belonging to Coventry, so it sets a matching share of its expected completions aside. Its five-year supply paper, dated December 2025, shows the effect:

Source: Warwick District Council, 5 Year Housing Land Supply Paper 2025 (December 2025), five years from 1 April 2025. The same figures appear in the Authority Monitoring Report 2024/25.
StepCouncil's figure
Standard method, five years at 1,0855,425 homes
With a 5% buffer5,696 homes, about 1,139 a year
Homes expected to be completed in the five years4,080
Share set aside for Coventry's unmet need (45.36%)1,851
Supply counted for the district2,230 homes
Result1.96 years, a deficit of 3,466 homes

The 45.36% is Coventry's part of the plan's requirement for 2017/18 to 2028/29: 5,976 homes out of 13,176. Without that deduction, the same pipeline would come to roughly three and a half years.

Behind the 4,080 are 3,192 homes with planning permission, 272 on allocated sites that still lack it, 505 from windfall sites and 111 homes' worth of student rooms and care beds, converted at 2.4 students and 1.9 residents to a home. The council makes no deduction for permissions that might lapse, and counts nothing yet from the small urban sites it identified in 2015/16. The buffer stays at 5% because the delivery test result the paper relied on, 104%, is above the 85% that would trigger 20%. For context, the 2017 plan allocated land for 10,659 homes in all under policy DS10, leaving windfall and other sites to make up the rest of its 16,776.

Where the Method Came From

The approach was argued out at an inquiry, sitting from October 2023 to January 2024, into 83 homes at the Warwickshire Police headquarters site in Leek Wootton. The council had put its supply at about 6,112 homes, while the developer said 4,772, which it described as 7.12 years, or 3.89 years once Coventry was taken into account. The inspector accepted the Coventry share as a blunt instrument but the only logical way to reflect the plan's strategy in the figure, found a supply of 4.01 years, and allowed the appeal in May 2024. The council's latest figure applies the same share to a smaller pipeline.

What the Shortfall Is Doing to Decisions

The district has kept building. Its monitoring report for 2024/25 shows completions running at between 841 and 1,168 homes a year from 2017/18 to 2024/25, when 850 were finished, 318 of them affordable, or 37.4%. Against the 2017 plan's own stepped requirement of 600 homes a year to 2016/17 and 1,098 a year since, the district had delivered 11,003 homes by March 2025 against 12,384 required.

The shortfall brings the tilted balance into applications, which planning officers spell out to councillors. In November 2025 officers recommended 140 homes, 40% of them affordable, on land off Westwood Heath Road, close to Coventry, a site taken out of the Green Belt by the 2017 plan. Councillors refused it by five votes to four, with one officer reminding them that the missing five-year supply meant they had to weigh the scheme differently. Committee decisions can go either way; the evidence behind an application has to be complete enough to stand up at appeal.

How National Policy Applies Here

Outside the Green Belt, policy S5 of the August 2026 framework counts a supply under five years as evidence of unmet housing need, which supports homes past a settlement's edge where the land genuinely belongs to the place beside it and the infrastructure can take them. Inside the towns, policy S4 tilts decisions towards approval, and a refusal needs harm that substantially outweighs what a scheme offers. Green Belt land sits outside S5 altogether. There the question is whether land is grey belt, for which the shortfall provides the evidence of need that national policy asks for, with the Golden Rules on affordable housing, infrastructure and green space to follow. Our grey belt guide covers how a parcel is assessed against the Green Belt purposes.

Growth Villages, Infill and Previously Developed Land

The 2017 plan directs growth to Warwick, Leamington, Whitnash and Kenilworth and to the southern edge of Coventry, then to growth villages where it allocated sites, including Barford, Bishop's Tachbrook, Baginton, Cubbington and Hampton Magna. To make room, it took land out of the Green Belt at Baginton, Burton Green, Cubbington, Hatton Park, Hampton Magna, Leek Wootton and Kingswood. For villages still in the Green Belt, policy H11 allows only limited infill housing. The practical routes are:

  1. Within the towns and growth villages. Gardens, backland and underused plots inside the built-up area, judged under policy S4.
  2. Previously developed land in the Green Belt. Yards, depots and redundant commercial sites, which Green Belt policy treats apart from open fields. Our brownfield and yards page covers what we look for.
  3. Grey belt fields. Land that contributes little to the Green Belt purposes, now that need is evidenced.
  4. Through the joint plan. Open land that needs Green Belt boundaries redrawn, where the South Warwickshire Local Plan is the main route.

Eleven Neighbourhood Plans

The council's monitoring report lists made neighbourhood plans for Barford, Whitnash, Baginton and Bubbenhall, Leek Wootton and Guy's Cliffe, Budbrooke, Kenilworth, Radford Semele, Royal Leamington Spa, Bishop's Tachbrook, Burton Green and, most recently, Cubbington in December 2025. A made neighbourhood plan sits within the statutory development plan, so the parish's own choices about the siting of new homes carry weight in each local decision.

Hatton, Leamington and the Edge of Coventry in the Joint Plan

Over the 25 years to March 2050, the South Warwickshire Local Plan asks Warwick District for 27,125 homes, the same 1,085 a year as today's standard method, and the district will go on testing its own five-year supply apart from Stratford-on-Avon. Policy DS.3 finds the homes here:

From policy DS.3 of the South Warwickshire Local Plan, Regulation 19 version (July 2026).
Source of homesHomes in the plan period
Hatton new community4,000
South of Coventry4,015
South of Coventry, Kings Hill1,500
Bishop's Tachbrook north west and west1,720 and 655
Leamington Spa east (Lillington)1,455
Leamington Spa north (Blackdown and Milverton)1,043 and 974
Warwick west850
Kenilworth south776
Local growth allocations1,461
Sites carried forward from the 2017 plan1,307
Existing commitments6,149
Windfall2,426
Total28,331

The plan accepts that exceptional circumstances justify taking land out of the Green Belt, pointing to high levels of need and the lack of sustainable alternatives, and noting that every station in south Warwickshire is in or close to it. The site proposals give Hatton two primary schools and a secondary school, a district centre and a spine road bridging the railway and the canal, with improved rail facilities. South of Bishop's Tachbrook, 121 hectares are set aside for employment alongside a new M40 junction to replace junctions 13 and 14, while the north west site, which lies outside the Green Belt, brings a 40-hectare extension to Tachbrook Country Park.

Owners whose land is already in the joint call for sites can still send updates, such as a changed boundary or further evidence, but no new sites are being taken. Fresh land now comes forward by application or waits for a later review.

The Land We Look for in Warwick District

  • Yards, depots and former commercial land with lawful buildings or hardstanding, in or out of the Green Belt.
  • Plots and backland inside Leamington, Warwick, Whitnash and Kenilworth.
  • Land beside the growth villages, such as Barford, Bishop's Tachbrook, Cubbington and Hampton Magna.
  • Green Belt fields that are enclosed by roads, railways or existing homes and do little to keep towns apart.
  • Holdings near Hatton, Warwick Parkway or Kenilworth stations, or next to the joint plan's growth locations.

Green Belt and grey belt cases rest on detailed landscape and openness evidence, alongside the usual access, drainage and ecology work. That work is commissioned and paid for by us. The option price is agreed before any of it begins and is pitched above the land's present value. The land remains in your use throughout, and if permission never comes it stays yours with nothing to repay.

Warwick District Before the Joint Plan's Examination

Submission by the End of 2026

After a final consultation from 21 July to 8 September 2026, the two councils aim to submit the plan to the government by 31 December 2026. The earlier preferred options stage drew more than 22,000 responses, a sign of how closely the examination will be followed. Until it is adopted, the 2017 plan and the shortfall set the terms for applications.

The Next Supply Paper

The 2025 paper appeared in December 2025, eight months after its base date, and rests on a housing trajectory that takes in the latest updates from the companies preparing and building each site. The next one, at 1 April 2026, will show whether the Coventry deduction and the standard method still leave the district well short. Kings Hill, allocated south of Coventry in 2017, was expected to be marketed during 2026 with construction from 2028, so it adds little in the near term.

The Next Delivery Test

The government repeats the delivery test every year, and the current Housing Delivery Test 2025 was published on 17 August 2026. At 128% the district is clear of every consequence: an action plan follows a result under 95%, and a 20% buffer one under 85%. We will not guess the score.

A Southern Unitary Council, on Hold

In July 2026 the government chose a two-council model for Warwickshire, with a southern unitary covering Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick. Since the national pause of 7 September 2026, Stratford-on-Avon District Council has confirmed that the Warwickshire proposals are among those on hold for review, and that the May 2027 elections will use today's council boundaries. Warwick District Council remains the body deciding applications and taking the joint plan forward.

What This Means for Timing

  • Previously developed land and plots in the towns can be looked at now, and the shortfall adds weight to them.
  • Grey belt fields are best tested while the joint plan is still at examination, since adoption will bring new Green Belt boundaries and a fresh supply position.
  • Open Green Belt land that needs its boundary redrawn follows the joint plan and its later reviews. The typical span of each stage is in our guide to how long planning takes.

Questions About Land in Warwick District

Why does Coventry affect whether my land near Leamington can get planning?

Because the 2017 plan includes homes to meet Coventry's unmet need, the council counts only about 55% of its expected completions towards the district's own supply. That is a large part of why the district shows well under five years, and a shortfall gives weight to well placed housing land.

My field is in the Green Belt near Kenilworth. Does the shortfall help?

Not directly, since policy S5 does not apply in the Green Belt. It does matter if the field qualifies as grey belt, because the shortfall supplies the evidence of need national policy requires. Whether it qualifies depends on how the field performs against the Green Belt purposes, which we assess first.

I own land at Cubbington or Hampton Magna. Is that different?

It can be. The 2017 plan made both growth villages and took land at their edges out of the Green Belt for housing. Fields beyond the new boundary are usually still Green Belt, so exactly where yours sits matters. At Cubbington, the neighbourhood plan made in December 2025 also weighs in, and we read it before advising.

Will the Hatton new community make it harder to get my land approved?

It meets a large share of the district's need to 2050, but over many years, and none of its homes counts in the current five-year supply. The case for a well placed site rests on today's shortfall rather than on what Hatton may deliver later.

I have an old yard near Lapworth. Is it worth asking about?

Usually. Land with lawful commercial buildings or hardstanding counts as previously developed, which has its own route through Green Belt policy. Farm buildings are the exception, so we start by checking the site's planning history.

Tell Us About Your Land in Warwick District

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Warwickshire

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Warwickshire

    Selling land across Warwickshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 164%

    Selling Land in North Warwickshire

    Selling land in North Warwickshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 221%

    Selling Land in Nuneaton and Bedworth

    Selling land in Nuneaton and Bedworth? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 187%

    Selling Land in Rugby

    Selling land in Rugby? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 202%

    Selling Land in Stratford-on-Avon

    Selling land in Stratford-on-Avon? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.