Warwickshire council area
Selling Land in Warwick District
Warwick District sets aside almost half of the homes it expects to build over the next five years for Coventry, which is why a council that passes the Housing Delivery Test comfortably counts only 1.96 years of land for its own needs. Most of its countryside is Green Belt, and the joint South Warwickshire Local Plan now proposes a new community at Hatton and large extensions to Leamington, Kenilworth and the edge of Coventry.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
Leamington, Warwick, Kenilworth and a Ring of Green Belt Villages
Warwick District Council is run from Leamington Spa and covers about 283 square kilometres, home to some 148,500 people at the 2021 census. Leamington Spa is the largest town, followed by Warwick, Kenilworth and Whitnash, and the rest is a rural district of parishes such as Bishop's Tachbrook, Cubbington, Barford, Hatton, Stoneleigh and Baginton. Six stations serve it: Leamington Spa, Warwick, Warwick Parkway, Kenilworth, Hatton and Lapworth.
- Passing the delivery test. A score of 128% in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, from 2,563 homes built where 1,998 were required.
- A plan running to 2029. The Warwick District Local Plan 2011 to 2029 was adopted in September 2017, so it is now 9 years old.
- Well short on supply. Its monitoring report puts supply at 1.96 years, measured from 1 April 2025.
- Mostly Green Belt beyond the towns. In the adopted plan's words, the vast majority of the district's rural area lies within the West Midlands Green Belt.
For a landowner, the two facts that matter most sit side by side: a supply shortfall that gives real weight to new homes, and a Green Belt that decides which land that weight can actually reach.
Warwick District in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
128%
Meeting its housing requirement.
Five-year housing land supply
1.96 years
Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Position at 1 April 2025, measured against the standard method, 1,085 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer, with 45% of expected completions set aside for Coventry's unmet need. Stated by Warwick District Council (Authority Monitoring Report 2024/25).
Checked sourceHomes built against homes needed
2,563
of 1,998 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
September 2017
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Updated
South Warwickshire Local Plan: final consultation closed 8 September 2026; submission due by 31 December 2026
Checked source
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
What the Shortfall Is Doing to Decisions
The district has kept building. Its monitoring report for 2024/25 shows completions running at between 841 and 1,168 homes a year from 2017/18 to 2024/25, when 850 were finished, 318 of them affordable, or 37.4%. Against the 2017 plan's own stepped requirement of 600 homes a year to 2016/17 and 1,098 a year since, the district had delivered 11,003 homes by March 2025 against 12,384 required.
The shortfall brings the tilted balance into applications, which planning officers spell out to councillors. In November 2025 officers recommended 140 homes, 40% of them affordable, on land off Westwood Heath Road, close to Coventry, a site taken out of the Green Belt by the 2017 plan. Councillors refused it by five votes to four, with one officer reminding them that the missing five-year supply meant they had to weigh the scheme differently. Committee decisions can go either way; the evidence behind an application has to be complete enough to stand up at appeal.
How National Policy Applies Here
Outside the Green Belt, policy S5 of the August 2026 framework counts a supply under five years as evidence of unmet housing need, which supports homes past a settlement's edge where the land genuinely belongs to the place beside it and the infrastructure can take them. Inside the towns, policy S4 tilts decisions towards approval, and a refusal needs harm that substantially outweighs what a scheme offers. Green Belt land sits outside S5 altogether. There the question is whether land is grey belt, for which the shortfall provides the evidence of need that national policy asks for, with the Golden Rules on affordable housing, infrastructure and green space to follow. Our grey belt guide covers how a parcel is assessed against the Green Belt purposes.
Growth Villages, Infill and Previously Developed Land
The 2017 plan directs growth to Warwick, Leamington, Whitnash and Kenilworth and to the southern edge of Coventry, then to growth villages where it allocated sites, including Barford, Bishop's Tachbrook, Baginton, Cubbington and Hampton Magna. To make room, it took land out of the Green Belt at Baginton, Burton Green, Cubbington, Hatton Park, Hampton Magna, Leek Wootton and Kingswood. For villages still in the Green Belt, policy H11 allows only limited infill housing. The practical routes are:
- Within the towns and growth villages. Gardens, backland and underused plots inside the built-up area, judged under policy S4.
- Previously developed land in the Green Belt. Yards, depots and redundant commercial sites, which Green Belt policy treats apart from open fields. Our brownfield and yards page covers what we look for.
- Grey belt fields. Land that contributes little to the Green Belt purposes, now that need is evidenced.
- Through the joint plan. Open land that needs Green Belt boundaries redrawn, where the South Warwickshire Local Plan is the main route.
Eleven Neighbourhood Plans
The council's monitoring report lists made neighbourhood plans for Barford, Whitnash, Baginton and Bubbenhall, Leek Wootton and Guy's Cliffe, Budbrooke, Kenilworth, Radford Semele, Royal Leamington Spa, Bishop's Tachbrook, Burton Green and, most recently, Cubbington in December 2025. A made neighbourhood plan sits within the statutory development plan, so the parish's own choices about the siting of new homes carry weight in each local decision.
Hatton, Leamington and the Edge of Coventry in the Joint Plan
Over the 25 years to March 2050, the South Warwickshire Local Plan asks Warwick District for 27,125 homes, the same 1,085 a year as today's standard method, and the district will go on testing its own five-year supply apart from Stratford-on-Avon. Policy DS.3 finds the homes here:
| Source of homes | Homes in the plan period |
|---|---|
| Hatton new community | 4,000 |
| South of Coventry | 4,015 |
| South of Coventry, Kings Hill | 1,500 |
| Bishop's Tachbrook north west and west | 1,720 and 655 |
| Leamington Spa east (Lillington) | 1,455 |
| Leamington Spa north (Blackdown and Milverton) | 1,043 and 974 |
| Warwick west | 850 |
| Kenilworth south | 776 |
| Local growth allocations | 1,461 |
| Sites carried forward from the 2017 plan | 1,307 |
| Existing commitments | 6,149 |
| Windfall | 2,426 |
| Total | 28,331 |
The plan accepts that exceptional circumstances justify taking land out of the Green Belt, pointing to high levels of need and the lack of sustainable alternatives, and noting that every station in south Warwickshire is in or close to it. The site proposals give Hatton two primary schools and a secondary school, a district centre and a spine road bridging the railway and the canal, with improved rail facilities. South of Bishop's Tachbrook, 121 hectares are set aside for employment alongside a new M40 junction to replace junctions 13 and 14, while the north west site, which lies outside the Green Belt, brings a 40-hectare extension to Tachbrook Country Park.
Owners whose land is already in the joint call for sites can still send updates, such as a changed boundary or further evidence, but no new sites are being taken. Fresh land now comes forward by application or waits for a later review.
The Land We Look for in Warwick District
- Yards, depots and former commercial land with lawful buildings or hardstanding, in or out of the Green Belt.
- Plots and backland inside Leamington, Warwick, Whitnash and Kenilworth.
- Land beside the growth villages, such as Barford, Bishop's Tachbrook, Cubbington and Hampton Magna.
- Green Belt fields that are enclosed by roads, railways or existing homes and do little to keep towns apart.
- Holdings near Hatton, Warwick Parkway or Kenilworth stations, or next to the joint plan's growth locations.
Green Belt and grey belt cases rest on detailed landscape and openness evidence, alongside the usual access, drainage and ecology work. That work is commissioned and paid for by us. The option price is agreed before any of it begins and is pitched above the land's present value. The land remains in your use throughout, and if permission never comes it stays yours with nothing to repay.
Warwick District Before the Joint Plan's Examination
Submission by the End of 2026
After a final consultation from 21 July to 8 September 2026, the two councils aim to submit the plan to the government by 31 December 2026. The earlier preferred options stage drew more than 22,000 responses, a sign of how closely the examination will be followed. Until it is adopted, the 2017 plan and the shortfall set the terms for applications.
The Next Supply Paper
The 2025 paper appeared in December 2025, eight months after its base date, and rests on a housing trajectory that takes in the latest updates from the companies preparing and building each site. The next one, at 1 April 2026, will show whether the Coventry deduction and the standard method still leave the district well short. Kings Hill, allocated south of Coventry in 2017, was expected to be marketed during 2026 with construction from 2028, so it adds little in the near term.
The Next Delivery Test
The government repeats the delivery test every year, and the current Housing Delivery Test 2025 was published on 17 August 2026. At 128% the district is clear of every consequence: an action plan follows a result under 95%, and a 20% buffer one under 85%. We will not guess the score.
A Southern Unitary Council, on Hold
In July 2026 the government chose a two-council model for Warwickshire, with a southern unitary covering Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick. Since the national pause of 7 September 2026, Stratford-on-Avon District Council has confirmed that the Warwickshire proposals are among those on hold for review, and that the May 2027 elections will use today's council boundaries. Warwick District Council remains the body deciding applications and taking the joint plan forward.
What This Means for Timing
- Previously developed land and plots in the towns can be looked at now, and the shortfall adds weight to them.
- Grey belt fields are best tested while the joint plan is still at examination, since adoption will bring new Green Belt boundaries and a fresh supply position.
- Open Green Belt land that needs its boundary redrawn follows the joint plan and its later reviews. The typical span of each stage is in our guide to how long planning takes.
Questions About Land in Warwick District
Why does Coventry affect whether my land near Leamington can get planning?
Because the 2017 plan includes homes to meet Coventry's unmet need, the council counts only about 55% of its expected completions towards the district's own supply. That is a large part of why the district shows well under five years, and a shortfall gives weight to well placed housing land.
My field is in the Green Belt near Kenilworth. Does the shortfall help?
Not directly, since policy S5 does not apply in the Green Belt. It does matter if the field qualifies as grey belt, because the shortfall supplies the evidence of need national policy requires. Whether it qualifies depends on how the field performs against the Green Belt purposes, which we assess first.
I own land at Cubbington or Hampton Magna. Is that different?
It can be. The 2017 plan made both growth villages and took land at their edges out of the Green Belt for housing. Fields beyond the new boundary are usually still Green Belt, so exactly where yours sits matters. At Cubbington, the neighbourhood plan made in December 2025 also weighs in, and we read it before advising.
Will the Hatton new community make it harder to get my land approved?
It meets a large share of the district's need to 2050, but over many years, and none of its homes counts in the current five-year supply. The case for a well placed site rests on today's shortfall rather than on what Hatton may deliver later.
I have an old yard near Lapworth. Is it worth asking about?
Usually. Land with lawful commercial buildings or hardstanding counts as previously developed, which has its own route through Green Belt policy. Farm buildings are the exception, so we start by checking the site's planning history.
Tell Us About Your Land in Warwick District
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.
More in Warwickshire
County overview
Selling Land in Warwickshire
Selling land across Warwickshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 164%
Selling Land in North Warwickshire
Selling land in North Warwickshire? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 221%
Selling Land in Nuneaton and Bedworth
Selling land in Nuneaton and Bedworth? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 187%
Selling Land in Rugby
Selling land in Rugby? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 202%
Selling Land in Stratford-on-Avon
Selling land in Stratford-on-Avon? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Sources
- Warwick District Council: Authority Monitoring Report 2024/25 (March 2026)
- Warwick District Council: Warwick District Local Plan 2011 to 2029 (adopted September 2017)
- Planning Inspectorate: Appeal decision APP/T3725/W/23/3319752, Warwickshire Police Headquarters, Leek Wootton (24 May 2024)
- Warwick District Council: 5 Year Housing Land Supply Paper 2025 (December 2025)
- South Warwickshire Local Plan, Regulation 19 version: Development strategy (July 2026)
- South Warwickshire Local Plan, Regulation 19 version: Site proposals (July 2026)
- South Warwickshire Local Plan: Call for sites
- Warwick District Council: Next steps for the South Warwickshire Local Plan (16 July 2026)
- Kenilworth Nub News: Councillors block 140 homes despite officers' recommendations (November 2025)
- Warwick District Council: Joint statement from the six councils in Warwickshire on local government reorganisation (16 July 2026)
- Stratford-on-Avon District Council: Statement on local government reorganisation (7 September 2026)
- Wikipedia: Warwick District
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.