Norfolk council area
Selling Land in North Norfolk
Checked on
North Norfolk adopted a new Local Plan in December 2025 and reports 7.3 years of housing land, yet the Housing Delivery Test 2025 found it had built only 54% of the homes required, the lowest result in Norfolk. Below 75%, national policy treats unmet need as evidenced whatever the supply figure says, which gives land well related to its towns and larger villages a route it would not otherwise have. Around that sit a National Landscape covering about a quarter of the district, retreating cliffs and river catchments under nutrient rules.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
In short
We buy land in North Norfolk and welcome land of every kind there: fields and paddocks, inherited land, old yards and larger holdings.
North Norfolk built only 54% of the homes it needed in the government's latest count, and below 75% national policy treats the need for more homes as shown. So a well placed field next to a town or village can make its case now, not only through the local plan, though each site is judged on its merits. Land in the Green Belt faces stricter national tests. Its local plan dates from December 2025.
We look for 2 acres or more next to, or well related to, a town or village, with a road frontage or a way to get one.
The next step is a free, confidential desktop review. We tell you which route, if any, suits your land, with no obligation.
North Norfolk in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
54%
Below 75%: treated as having evidenced unmet housing need under national policy S5.
Five-year housing land supply
7.3 years
Five years or more of deliverable housing land. Position at 31 March 2025, measured against the standard method as the 2021 framework set it, 536 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer (a statement written before the 2025 Housing Delivery Test result, which the council says requires a 20% buffer). Stated by North Norfolk District Council.
Checked sourceHomes built against homes needed
908
of 1,678 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
December 2025
The plan currently used to decide applications.
New plan progress
Latest step
Local Plan adopted 17 December 2025; notice of a new plan for 2029 to 2045 given on 30 June 2026; calls for sites held 1 June to 13 July and 20 July to 31 August 2026, and scoping consultation 20 July to 31 August 2026; the council's timetable puts Gateway 1 on 31 October 2026, submission on 18 December 2028 and adoption on 30 April 2029
Checked source
See how North Norfolk compares with the other 166 councils we cover
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
The Land We Look for in North Norfolk
- Fields adjoining Fakenham, North Walsham, Holt, Stalham or Hoveton, outside the National Landscape.
- Land on the edge of a growth village, for an S5 case while delivery stays below 75%.
- Fields just inland of an eroding village, outside the Coastal Change Management Area.
- Larger holdings near the railway and the A140 between Cromer and North Walsham, or the A1065 and A1067 around Fakenham, for the new plan.
- Plots and yards inside the towns, and village-edge land for a rural exception scheme.
We agree your price at the start, above the land's current value, and pay for the planning work a North Norfolk site needs: access, drainage, the nutrient budget, landscape and ecology. Farming or letting carries on meanwhile; should no permission come, the land remains yours with nothing owed. Our how it works page covers each stage, and our Norfolk page sets the district beside its neighbours.
The planning detail in full
Eight Growth Towns Between the Cliffs and the Broads
North Norfolk had 102,979 residents at the 2021 census, 1.5% more than in 2011, according to the council's scoping consultation of June 2026.
- Eight towns in the plan. The inspector records Cromer, North Walsham and Fakenham as Large Growth Towns, and Holt, Hoveton, Sheringham, Stalham and Wells-next-the-Sea as Small Growth Towns. Growth villages such as Blakeney follow; beyond them is countryside, under policy SS2.
- A protected coast. About a quarter of the district lies in the Norfolk Coast National Landscape, which the Norfolk Coast Partnership describes as running from Old Hunstanton past Weybourne to Bacton in its central zone, with Sheringham, Cromer and Mundesley's built-up areas excluded.
- Cliffs on the move. The council describes some of the fastest eroding coastline in north west Europe, with soft cliffs retreating around 1.7 metres a year on average.
- Rivers under nutrient rules. Since Natural England's advice of 2022, new homes across large parts of the district must add nothing to nutrient pollution in the River Wensum or the Broads.
- A test that stops at the Broads. Delivery is measured without the district's share of the Broads National Park.
Enough Land on Paper, Too Few Homes Built
The two national tests ask different questions, and here give opposite answers:
| Housing Delivery Test | Five-year supply | |
|---|---|---|
| Period | April 2022 to March 2025, looking back | Five years forward from 31 March 2025 |
| Yardstick | 1,678 homes required | 536 homes a year, the standard method as the 2021 framework set it, plus 5%: 2,815 homes |
| What counts | Net new homes completed | Homes with permission, plus sites without it where the council judges building highly likely |
| The count | 908 homes built | 4,107 deliverable homes |
| Result | 54% | 7.3 years |
Why a Council Can Pass One Test and Fail the Other
- Different years. Delivery looks back over the years when the nutrient advice held permissions up. MHCLG's figures record 348 homes delivered in 2022/23 against 562 required, and the scoping consultation counts only 360 completions in 2024/25, a year in which permission was granted for over 2,000 homes. Supply looks forward to when those permissions are built.
- Different things counted. Delivery counts finished homes only. The September 2025 statement counts every home the council expects within five years, including allowances for sites without permission.
- Different moments. The statement took its base date before the plan was adopted, with a 5% buffer because the result then in force was 87%.
From 20% to 5% and Back to 20%
After the results of 12 December 2024 the plan's inspector wrote to the council that supply for 2025 to 2030 "should be at least 557 x 5 + 20% = 3,342 dwellings". In March 2025 MHCLG recalculated the 2023 measurement at 87%, finding census-adjusted stock figures "not appropriate to use in the HDT", which meant an action plan only, so the final report and the statement used 5%. The Housing Delivery Test 2025, published on 17 August 2026, brings the 20% back, as the council's supply and delivery page now says.
Supply still clears five years on our own arithmetic, since the September 2025 statement gives no figure with a 20% buffer: on the plan's 557 a year plus 20%, the 3,342 homes needed set against the 4,107 counted give about 6.1 years; on 536 a year plus 20%, about 6.4. Decisions would carry 20% on a second ground too: since 1 July 2026 it applies, for decisions only, where a requirement adopted within five years was examined under a pre-December 2024 framework and is 80% or less of the standard method figure. This plan was examined under the July 2021 framework, and the council says its requirement meets "less than 80 per cent" of need under the new method.
What the Delivery Result Opens, and What It Leaves Closed
Under the August 2026 framework, policy S5 is the route for housing on sites close to and connected with a settlement, with infrastructure able to cope, once unmet need is evidenced. A delivery result under 75% is that evidence in itself, and the council says so: an evidenced unmet need "is deemed to exist for the purposes of applying NPPF Policy S5(1)(j)". A supply shortfall would only be evidence to weigh, not an automatic finding; here delivery carries the case. By location:
- Inside a town or village. Under policy S4, plots, yards and backland win approval unless the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.
- Beside a growth town or village. A field adjoining Fakenham, North Walsham, Holt or a growth village, with workable access and drainage, can make an S5 case while the result stays below 75%.
- Inside the National Landscape. S5 does not lift its protection. The inspector gave great weight to its landscape and scenic beauty, and at Blakeney looked for exceptional circumstances in the public interest.
- Beyond the villages. Policy HOU3, Affordable Homes in the Countryside, is the district's rural exception route: the inspector noted that it "will still support conventional rural exception housing schemes".
- In a nutrient catchment. A site draining to the Wensum or the Broads must still show nutrient neutrality under policy CC13.
Our paddocks and small sites page covers smaller parcels.
The 2024 to 2040 Plan: 8,900 Homes, Led by North Walsham West
The North Norfolk Local Plan 2024 to 2040, adopted in December 2025, was examined by the inspector David Reed. He replaced the council's own method with the standard method, giving 557 homes a year and a minimum of 8,900 over sixteen years, and found the plan provides for about 9,880, a margin of 980. The largest allocations:
| Allocation | Town | Homes |
|---|---|---|
| North Walsham West (NW62/A) | North Walsham | About 2,000, mixed use |
| Land north of Rudham Stile Lane, west of Water Moor Lane | Fakenham | About 627 |
| Land west of Pine Tree Farm, Norwich Road (C22/2, extended by C22/4) | Cromer | Some 400 plus elderly accommodation, and about 100 more on the extension |
North Walsham West comes with a western link road between Norwich Road and Cromer Road; the trajectory the inspector saw put its first homes in 2028/29, with some 730 after 2040.
Two Affordable Housing Zones
Policy HOU2 splits the district in two. The inspector recorded "a higher value coastal zone (with Hoveton) where 35% affordable housing is required on large housing sites, and a lower value inland zone (including North Walsham and Fakenham) where 15% is required." We allow for the zone from the first appraisal; our land value page explains the other costs.
A Quarter of the District in the National Landscape, and the Second Homes Behind It
The National Landscape, designated in 1968, covers 453 square kilometres. The Norfolk Coast Partnership, acting for the county council and the three district and borough councils that share it, speaks of managing the landscape "sensitively, rather than protecting it from all change". Adopted policy ENV1 covers both it and the Broads, and the examination showed where the line falls:
- Wells-next-the-Sea. Site W07/1, beside Holkham Road, was deleted because it "would consolidate a form of linear sprawl along the undeveloped coast", with a landscape impact that "cannot be mitigated".
- Blakeney. Wholly inside the designation, yet both allocations stayed, because "particularly high house prices and second/holiday home ownership" made exceptional circumstances in the public interest.
- Sheringham. A site north of Woodland Rise was accepted as effectively within the built-up area.
How Many Homes Are Second Homes
The adopted plan, from council tax records of 2020, says about 8.1% of homes are registered as second homes, rising to 38% in Salthouse. The scoping consultation gives 8.3% for second homes and 12.6% once caravans, chalets and other holiday accommodation are added; on second homes alone the two are close.
Retreating Cliffs and Held Permissions: The Coast and the Catchments
| Constraint | What applies | What it means for land |
|---|---|---|
| Coastal Change Management Area (policy CC5) | No permanent new homes, including by change of use, in the coastal strip the policies treat as at risk of erosion over the next 100 years | Land inside it is not a housing prospect |
| Coastal adaptation (policy CC6 and the 2023 guidance) | Homes at risk can move to a site outside the Management Area with access and facilities at least as good; the old building is normally expected to be demolished | A field just inland of an eroding village may suit relocated homes |
| Nutrient neutrality (policy CC13) | Schemes adding overnight stays in the Wensum and Broads catchments must add no nutrient pollution | A cost and a timing question: in September 2025 permissions for around 1,400 homes were held awaiting mitigation |
The inspector found the district "affected more than most by an eroding coastline east of Cromer". The council's coastal adaptation guidance of September 2023 sets out how relocation works, and the scoping consultation proposes to redraw the Management Area from the Environment Agency's erosion mapping of 2025 and the refreshed Shoreline Management Plans.
On nutrients, the Fakenham Water Recycling Centre was upgraded by March 2025, which the supply statement says is "substantially reducing constraints in the Wensum catchment". Flooding is a separate test; our flood risk guide covers it.
From Gateway 1 to a Plan for 932 Homes a Year
Notice of a new plan for 2029 to 2045 was given on 30 June 2026. The scoping consultation puts need under the new method at 932 homes a year, 375 more than the adopted 557, or 13,980 over fifteen years. The council's timetable sets out the stages:
| Stage | Council's date |
|---|---|
| Two calls for sites, the second alongside the scoping consultation | 1 June to 13 July and 20 July to 31 August 2026 (held) |
| Gateway 1 self-assessment summary | 31 October 2026 |
| Consultation on proposed content and evidence | 12 April to 24 May 2027 |
| Gateway 2, the Planning Inspectorate's observations | 1 November 2027 |
| Proposed plan consultation | 13 March to 8 May 2028 |
| Gateway 3, the Planning Inspectorate's observations | 9 October 2028 |
| Submission for examination | 18 December 2028 |
| Adoption | 30 April 2029 |
Six growth options went out for comment, including a new settlement, for which the document names the railway and A140 between Cromer and North Walsham, and the A1065 and A1067 around Fakenham. The call for sites took land for five homes or 0.25 hectares, and suggested sites "will be further assessed as part of the Local Plan process". Our guide to plan stages explains what follows.
The Result That Decides the S5 Case
The test is refreshed each year. The next drops 2022/23, a year for which MHCLG's 2025 letter recorded 348 homes delivered, and adds 2025/26; we would not predict it. Below 75% unmet need stays evidenced for S5. At 75% or more that evidence would go, and with supply above five years on every basis above, edge-of-settlement fields would lose today's route.
The council says it updates its supply statement at least once a year; on 29 September 2026 its document library showed none newer than September 2025, and no action plan for the latest result. The scoping document says Natural England gave notice in December 2025 of an environmental delivery plan on nutrients for the Broads, the Wensum included, that applies here. The government withdrew its reorganisation decisions for Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex and Hampshire on 7 September 2026 and opened a review, adding that the elections of May 2027 would take place on the existing boundaries.
- Edge-of-settlement land: now, while the result stays below 75%.
- Larger holdings: evidence ready for the content and evidence consultation, which the timetable puts at 12 April to 24 May 2027.
- Plots in the towns and exception sites: at any time.
Questions About Land in North Norfolk
The council says it has well over five years of land. Why would a field outside North Walsham have a case now?
Because the delivery result decides it, not the supply. At 54%, below 75%, the council accepts that unmet need is deemed to exist for policy S5, so land that relates well to the town, with roads and services to support it, can go forward now, subject to access, drainage and nutrients.
Our land is inside the National Landscape near Blakeney. Is it ruled out?
Not automatically, but the bar is high. The inspector kept both Blakeney allocations because high prices and second home ownership made exceptional circumstances, and deleted a Wells site that would have sprawled along the coast.
We own fields behind the eroding cliffs near Happisburgh. Could they take homes moving back from the coast?
Possibly. The council's guidance lets homes at risk relocate outside the Coastal Change Management Area, to sites with access and facilities at least as good, and normally expects the old building to be demolished.
Is nutrient neutrality still holding up land around Fakenham?
Less than it was. The council says the upgraded Fakenham Water Recycling Centre substantially reduced constraints in the Wensum catchment. A scheme must still show neutrality under policy CC13, and we pay for the nutrient budget that tests it.
I missed both calls for sites in 2026. Is that the end of it?
Not necessarily. The calls have closed, but the timetable has a consultation on proposed content in 2027 and on the proposed plan in 2028, where land can be raised. Meanwhile, with delivery below 75%, well related land can go forward as an application under policy S5.
What price will you pay for my land?
We agree a fixed price with you at the start, before any planning work begins, and it is set above what your land is worth today. We cannot name a figure before we have looked at your land, because it depends on the site itself: its size, its access, how many homes it could take and the costs that come off land value, such as affordable housing, road works and drainage. After the free desktop review we can talk about a price, and once agreed it is written into the agreement.
When would I be paid?
You receive the agreed price on completion, once planning permission has been secured. The agreement sets out the milestones along the way, and it continues while any planning application or appeal is being decided. Until completion you carry on using your land as you do now, and we pay for all of the planning. If permission is not granted, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Tell Us About Your Land in North Norfolk
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly.
- We reply within 2 working days, by phone or email, whichever you prefer.
- The desktop review is free and confidential, with no obligation.
- If we agree terms, we pay for all of the planning, which on a larger site can reach £300,000.
More in Norfolk
County overview
Selling Land in Norfolk
Selling land across Norfolk? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 144%
Selling Land in Breckland
Selling land in Breckland? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 2.82 years.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 92%
Selling Land in Great Yarmouth
Selling land in Great Yarmouth? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 111% (joint area)
Selling Land in Broadland
Selling land in Broadland? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 4.85 years.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 100%
Selling Land in King's Lynn and West Norfolk
Selling land in King's Lynn and West Norfolk? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 111% (joint area)
Selling Land in Norwich
Selling land in Norwich? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 4.85 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 111% (joint area)
Selling Land in South Norfolk
Selling land in South Norfolk? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Sources
- North Norfolk District Council: North Norfolk Local Plan 2024 to 2040, adoption version (December 2025)
- Planning Inspectorate: Report on the examination of the North Norfolk Local Plan, with schedule of main modifications (October 2025)
- Planning Inspectorate: Inspector's letter on the five-year housing land supply requirement, North Norfolk Local Plan examination (January 2025)
- North Norfolk District Council: Five-Year Supply of Housing Land 2025 to 2030 (September 2025)
- North Norfolk District Council: Five-year supply of housing land and Housing Delivery Test (August 2026)
- MHCLG: Letter on the recalculated 2023 Housing Delivery Test measurement for North Norfolk (March 2025)
- North Norfolk District Council: Local Plan Review Scoping Consultation, Cabinet (June 2026)
- North Norfolk District Council: Local Plan timetable (June 2026)
- North Norfolk District Council: Call for Sites (2026)
- North Norfolk District Council: Coastal Adaptation Supplementary Planning Document (September 2023)
- Norfolk Coast Partnership: About the Norfolk Coast Partnership
- GOV.UK: Review of local government reorganisation launched (September 2026)
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.