Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:07958 351879

Norfolk council area

Selling Land in Breckland

Checked on

Breckland built 144% of the homes the government's delivery test asked of it, yet its council cannot show five years of housing land. The plan adopted in November 2019 asked for 612 homes a year; the government now asks for 920, and that gap is why land around its five market towns is being looked at again. The council's timetable of July 2026 puts submission of a replacement plan to 2043, with two new settlements, by 31 December 2026.

  • We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
  • Your price is agreed up front, in writing
  • If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

In short

We buy land in Breckland and welcome land of every kind there: fields and paddocks, inherited land, old yards and larger holdings.

Breckland can show 2.82 years of housing land, short of the five years national policy expects. That shortfall is evidence of need which decisions must weigh, so a well placed field next to a town or village can make a case outside the local plan. It is not a guarantee. Land in the Green Belt faces stricter national tests. Its local plan dates from November 2019, and a new one was published for consultation in July 2026.

We look for 2 acres or more next to, or well related to, a town or village, with a road frontage or a way to get one.

The next step is a free, confidential desktop review. We tell you which route, if any, suits your land, with no obligation.

Breckland in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.

  • Housing Delivery Test 2025

    144%

    Meeting its housing requirement.

  • Five-year housing land supply

    2.82 years

    Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Position at 1 April 2025, measured against the standard method, 920 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer. Stated by Breckland Council.

    Checked source
  • Homes built against homes needed

    2,648

    of 1,841 needed, April 2022 to March 2025

  • Most recent strategic plan adopted

    November 2019

    More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.

  • New plan progress

    Latest step

    Regulation 19 pre-submission Local Plan 2025 to 2043 consultation ran 31 July to 23 September 2026; the Local Development Scheme of July 2026 puts submission by 31 December 2026, examination in 2027 and adoption, indicatively, in the second quarter of 2028

    Checked source

See how Breckland compares with the other 143 councils we cover

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

The Land We Look for in Breckland

  • Fields on the edge of Thetford, Attleborough, Dereham, Swaffham or Watton that read as part of the town, outside the Brecks buffers.
  • Land touching the built-up edge of Harling, Mattishall, Necton, Shipdham and the Primary Parishes.
  • Larger holdings east and west of Swaffham, east of Watton, and along the A11 between Attleborough and Thetford.
  • Plots, gardens and backland inside a settlement, judged under policy S4 whatever the supply figure says.
  • Yards, former commercial sites and farm buildings on a village edge, outside the buffers.

We agree your price at the start, above what the land is worth in its current use, and we pay for the planning work: habitats surveys, the nutrient budget, drainage, access and landscape evidence. If permission is never granted you keep the land and owe nothing, and you keep using it until completion. Our how it works page sets out each stage, and our Norfolk page compares Breckland with its neighbours.

The planning detail in full

Five Market Towns, the Brecks and the A11

Breckland is the large rural district of south west Norfolk, run from Dereham, with Thetford, Attleborough, Swaffham and Watton its other market towns. Its emerging plan describes the A11 linking Attleborough and Thetford with Norwich and Cambridge, and the A47 linking Dereham and Swaffham with Norwich and King's Lynn.

  • No Green Belt. The emerging plan has no Green Belt policy; land outside the built-up areas is open countryside, where homes need a specific policy to support them.
  • The Brecks. Some 39,434 hectares of heath, forest and farmland became a Special Protection Area in 2006 for ground nesting birds, stone curlew, woodlark and nightjar among them.
  • Two river catchments. The north east of the district, Dereham included, drains to the River Wensum or the Broads, where nutrient neutrality has applied since March 2022.
  • Delivery far above target. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 counted 2,648 homes built over three years against 1,841 required, a result of 144%.
  • Supply well short. Against 920 homes a year, the council's December 2025 statement finds 2.82 years of deliverable land.

That last pair is the story for a landowner: a council that builds a lot and still cannot show enough land, because the yardstick moved.

How 612 Homes a Year Became 920

The Breckland Local Plan, adopted in November 2019, provides for 612 homes a year. A Partial Update examined in 2023 left that figure alone: the inspector's report of 29 August 2023 found the standard method then gave only "an increase of 49 dwellings per annum" and noted a full review "intended for submission at the end of 2024". Within sixteen months the government had set mandatory targets: 903 for Breckland, then 920 in 2025.

On 29 November 2024 the plan turned five, so for measuring supply the standard method replaced its 612. The council's Statement of Five-Year Housing Land Supply of December 2025, with a base date of 1 April 2025, sets out the result:

Source: Breckland Council, Statement of Five-Year Housing Land Supply, December 2025.
Part of the calculationCouncil's figure
Annual housing target (standard method)920 homes
Five-year target4,600 homes
Buffer5%, or 230 homes
Five-year requirement with buffer4,830 homes, or 966 a year
Major sites with permission2,028 homes
Minor sites with permission392 homes
Windfall allowance300 homes, in years three to five
Deliverable supply2,720 homes
Result2.82 years

The gap is 2,110 homes over five years. The council counts only sites with permission, so the figure stays low until the new plan is adopted or permitted sites speed up. Delivery has been strong but uneven: 968 homes in 2022/23 and 1,154 in 2023/24, then 505 in 2024/25 against a target that year of 903.

What a Shortfall This Size Does for a Field

Under policy S5 of the August 2026 Framework, land well related to a settlement and served by infrastructure has a route to permission where unmet need is evidenced. A supply under five years is evidence of that need, to be weighed rather than an automatic finding; with no Green Belt, no field here is ruled out of S5 on that ground. Inside the built-up areas policy S4 applies instead, allowing refusal only where the harm would substantially outweigh the benefits.

A shortfall does not carry a weak site. In an appeal decided on 4 March 2026, under the Framework then in force, the council accepted it could not show five years of land, yet five homes off West Carr Road, Attleborough were still refused. The inspector found the shortfall engaged the part of adopted policy HOU 03 that supports homes outside settlement boundaries, but only where all four of its criteria are met, the first being that the site is immediately adjacent to a boundary. This field, beyond a cluster of houses cut off from the town by the A11, failed there. The recreation tariff had also not been secured, so harm to protected habitats could not be ruled out, which removed the presumption in favour of development. Our call for sites guide explains why a shortfall is the moment to have a site's evidence ready.

Five Towns and the Allocations the New Plan Adds

Much of the committed growth sits in two urban extensions permitted before this plan: a planned 5,000 homes north of Thetford beside the A11, built in phases, and 4,000 south west of Attleborough, with outline permission from March 2020, which the plan of July 2026 expected to start within 24 months and deliver about 1,050 homes by 2043. Policy HOU 02 of the Regulation 19 plan then adds new allocations:

Regulation 19 plan, July 2026, policy HOU 02 and paragraphs 5.27 to 5.31. Totals include 2025/26 completions, commitments and saved allocations.
TownNew allocationsTotal to 2043What shapes it
Attleborough1901,868The 4,000-home extension carries the town
Dereham700, including 360 at Dumpling Green1,720A47 junction constraints with no agreed solution
Swaffham2,470, including a 1,700-home extension2,828Growth east and west, not north or south
Thetford1,500 at Kingsfleet Grove3,770No allocations in the Brecks buffer outside the settlement boundary
Watton1,330, including a 1,000-home extension1,811Growth to the east, in Carbrooke parish

At Dereham the plan says a highways solution "may facilitate additional growth in a future review"; at Thetford the buffer, not demand, sets the edge.

The Plan to 2043: 16,560 Homes and Two New Settlements

Policy HOU 01 of the Regulation 19 plan sets "a minimum requirement for delivery of at least 16,560 new homes between 1st April 2025 and 31st March 2043", 920 a year, and policy HOU 02 provides for 19,940, a 20.4% margin in case sites stall. Policy GEN 01 ranks two Strategic Development Areas first, then three urban extensions, the five towns, and Key Service, Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Parishes.

Policy SDA 2 allocates about 565 hectares either side of the A11 at Roudham and Larling for about 6,000 homes, at least 1,350 of them by 2043. A development brief must be prepared with the council and consulted on before the first major application, and the scheme must provide school sites, healthcare, a district centre and links to Harling Road station. East Tuddenham, 115 hectares on the A47, has about 2,500 homes, again 1,350 by 2043.

The Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment of July 2026 took sites of 0.25 hectares or more from calls for sites in 2022 and 2025. Of 428 site records, 92 passed, with room for about 21,650 homes, more than the plan needs; the assessment says "it is for the Local Plan itself to determine which of those sites are the most suitable".

A Timetable With a Hard Deadline

Breckland District Council Local Development Scheme, July 2026. The dates are the council's and may move.
StageLocal Development Scheme, July 2026
Regulation 19 consultationJuly to September 2026 (closed 23 September 2026)
Submission for examinationDecember 2026, deadline 31 December 2026
Examination2027, to be agreed with the Planning Inspectorate
AdoptionIndicative second quarter of 2028

The scheme is candid: a plan not submitted by 31 December 2026 cannot continue under the current system, and starting again could "significantly extend the period before an up to date Local Plan can be adopted".

Stone Curlews, Nutrients and Visitors: Three Checks Before the Housing Numbers

Three constraints can stop a Breckland housing site before its merits are weighed.

  1. The Brecks buffers. Adopted policy ENV 03, as the Local Government Association's summary records it, says development within 1,500 metres of Special Protection Area land used by stone curlew "will not normally be permitted", and the same within 400 metres of woodlark or nightjar land. Emerging policy ENV 07 instead requires a project level habitats assessment, and allows permission where harm can be prevented, for example by securing alternative land outside the protected area.
  2. Nutrient neutrality. Since Natural England's letter of 16 March 2022, new homes and other overnight accommodation draining to the River Wensum or the Broads must add no nutrient pollution. Emerging policy ENV 08 asks for a nutrient budget, a mitigation strategy and a shadow habitats assessment. Routes include on-site treatment and credits from Norfolk Environmental Credits, and mitigation must be in place before occupation and last at least 80 years.
  3. Visitor pressure. Every net new home pays the Norfolk recreation tariff protecting the Brecks, the north Norfolk coast and the Broads, £315.58 on the council's page, which says the fee is reviewed regularly. It is secured by a unilateral undertaking within 10 days of validation, and at West Carr Road its absence was a strong reason for refusal.

The buffers are mapped, the catchments follow the watersheds and the tariff is a known sum. They decide which fields are worth the planning spend, which we pay. Our farmland page explains how we assess a holding that straddles a buffer or a catchment.

Villages That Have Used Up Their Plan Targets

The adopted plan set a housing target for each Local Service Centre in policy HOU 02, and policy HOU 03 resists development outside their boundaries once the target "is provided for". The council's monitoring at April 2025 shows several villages well past theirs, and the emerging plan gives most of them no new allocation:

HOU 03 and HOU 04 monitoring, April 2025; the last two columns from the Regulation 19 plan, July 2026, policy HOU 02 and table 5.4.
VillageAdopted targetBuilt, permitted or allocated since 2011New allocationsWindfall cap
Great Ellingham195553None67
Shipdham282434None110
Swanton Morley184352None86
Necton25632075112
Mattishall149198None137

The new plan replaces settlement boundaries with a test of whether land is within or immediately adjacent to a built-up area, touching it without crossing a road, watercourse or field boundary. Its policy HOU 03 caps windfall homes from adoption at 200 in each market town and 10% of the homes in a Key Service Parish, falling to 3% in the smallest parishes, first come, first served; after that only affordable or specialist homes for local need.

So a village past its target is harder, not closed. A paddock touching the built-up edge of a Key Service or Primary Parish is worth a look; our paddocks and small sites page covers what we look for.

Breckland Between a Lapsed Plan and a December Deadline

The next Housing Delivery Test will drop 2022/23, when Breckland built 968 homes, and add 2025/26, for which the Regulation 19 plan records 821 completions. We would not predict the result. Below 95% an action plan is required, below 85% a 20% buffer is added to the supply calculation, and under 75% unmet need is treated as evidenced under policy S5.

The Supply Figure, and When It Changes

The 2.82 years was measured at 1 April 2025. The statement said the council would review the position in March 2026, and no later statement had been published by 28 September 2026. Statements leave out emerging allocations, so five years before adoption depends on permissions.

Examination, and Who Decides It

After submission, which the timetable puts by 31 December 2026, the 2027 examination will test the new settlements and town allocations, and main modifications could add, remove or resize sites; the council's consultation page expects the plan to gain full weight in mid 2028. On 7 September 2026 the government withdrew its reorganisation decisions for Norfolk and three other counties; the May 2027 elections go ahead on existing boundaries, so Breckland Council remains the authority taking this plan through.

  • Land touching a town or Key Service Parish can be looked at now, with the shortfall weighed under policy S5.
  • Land in the proposed allocations or new settlements is best prepared for the 2027 examination.
  • Land in a Brecks buffer or nutrient catchment needs its constraint mapped first, which our free review does.

Questions About Land in Breckland

My field is between Thetford and the forest. Does the stone curlew buffer rule it out?

Not automatically. Inside the 1,500 metre line the adopted policy says new homes will not normally be permitted, while the emerging one asks for a habitats assessment and allows permission where harm can be prevented. Outside the line the buffer does not apply.

The council says it has built far more homes than it needed. Why does it still need land?

The two tests measure different things. The delivery test looks back three years against the requirement of the time, and Breckland passed it easily. The five-year supply looks forward against 920 homes a year, and finds only 2.82 years. Policy S5 responds to that gap.

My land drains towards the Wensum. Is it worth anything for housing?

It can be, but the scheme must show nutrient neutrality, with mitigation in place before the first home is occupied and secured for at least 80 years. We price that cost into the appraisal and pay for the nutrient budget that works it out.

I put my land into the 2025 call for sites and it was not allocated. Is that the end of it?

No. The council found room for about 21,650 homes on 92 suitable sites against a requirement of 16,560, and the plan chose among them. While supply is short, a site touching a settlement's edge can still go forward as a planning application.

Our village has passed its plan target. Can anything still happen there?

Yes, but the edge matters. With supply short, adopted policy HOU 03 supports homes outside the boundary only where the site adjoins it and meets its other criteria. The emerging plan replaces the targets with a windfall cap for each parish, counted from adoption.

What price will you pay for my land?

We agree a fixed price with you at the start, before any planning work begins, and it is set above what your land is worth today. We cannot name a figure before we have looked at your land, because it depends on the site itself: its size, its access, how many homes it could take and the costs that come off land value, such as affordable housing, road works and drainage. After the free desktop review we can talk about a price, and once agreed it is written into the agreement.

When would I be paid?

You receive the agreed price on completion, once planning permission has been secured. The agreement sets out the milestones along the way, and it continues while any planning application or appeal is being decided. Until completion you carry on using your land as you do now, and we pay for all of the planning. If permission is not granted, you keep your land and owe nothing.

Tell Us About Your Land in Breckland

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly.

  • We reply within 2 working days, by phone or email, whichever you prefer.
  • The desktop review is free and confidential, with no obligation.
  • If we agree terms, we pay for all of the planning, which on a larger site can reach £300,000.
About your land

Type a few letters to find a council. Own land in more than one area? Give one here and tell us about the others below.

Not sure? Give your best guess.

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

More in Norfolk

  • County overview

    Selling Land in Norfolk

    Selling land across Norfolk? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.

  • Housing Delivery Test: 92%

    Selling Land in Great Yarmouth

    Selling land in Great Yarmouth? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.