East Sussex council area
Selling Land in Lewes
Checked on
Lewes has two planning authorities: the South Downs National Park Authority decides applications across more than half the district, including Lewes town, and the district council decides the rest. Outside the Park the council delivered 60% of the homes the test required, its last published land supply of 2.73 years dates from September 2023, and its draft plan finds room for around 8,570 homes against a need of about 15,000.
- We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
- Your price is agreed up front, in writing
- If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing
In short
We buy land in Lewes and welcome land of every kind there: fields and paddocks, inherited land, old yards and larger holdings.
Lewes built only 60% of the homes it needed in the government's latest count, and below 75% national policy treats the need for more homes as shown. It can also show only 2.73 years of the five years of housing land national policy expects. So a well placed field next to a town or village can make its case now, not only through the local plan, though each site is judged on its merits. Land in the Green Belt faces stricter national tests. Its local plan dates from May 2016, more than five years ago.
We look for 2 acres or more next to, or well related to, a town or village, with a road frontage or a way to get one.
The next step is a free, confidential desktop review. We tell you which route, if any, suits your land, with no obligation.
Lewes in Figures
The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.
Housing Delivery Test 2025
60%
Below 75%: treated as having evidenced unmet housing need under national policy S5.
Five-year housing land supply
2.73 years
Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Stated by Lewes District Council, for the district outside the South Downs National Park: its position at September 2023, which its Authority Monitoring Report 2024 to 2025 says has not been updated since.
Checked sourceHomes built against homes needed
1,398
of 2,341 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
May 2016
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Latest step
Regulation 18 consultations held in January and February 2025 (policies) and from 18 December 2025 to 28 February 2026 (spatial strategy and site allocations, about 8,570 homes to 2042 against about 15,000 by the government's method); the Local Development Scheme of February 2026 put the proposed submission plan in summer 2026, submission in winter 2026 against the 31 December 2026 deadline, examination in spring 2027 and adoption in winter 2027; on 29 September 2026 the council's local plan page (last updated 20 March 2026) still showed the second consultation as the latest stage
Checked source
See how Lewes compares with the other 147 councils we cover
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
The Land We Look for in Lewes
- Fields and paddocks on the edge of Seaford, Newhaven, Peacehaven and Telscombe, outside the Park boundary and above the flood zones.
- Land adjoining Ringmer, Newick, Plumpton Green, Wivelsfield Green, Cooksbridge, Barcombe and Chailey Green that can read as a rounding-off of the village.
- Yards, nurseries, depots and redundant farm buildings in the Low Weald, including sites the land availability assessment has already rated.
- Plots, large gardens and backland inside the planning boundaries of the coastal towns and villages.
- Larger holdings that could contribute to the growth the new plan has to find.
Every enquiry starts with the Park boundary, the flood map and the planning boundary. Where we take a site on, we pay for the landscape, highways, drainage and ecology work under an option agreement with a price agreed at the start, above today's value. The land stays in your use throughout, and should permission never come you keep the land and owe us nothing.
The planning detail in full
A District the National Park Cuts in Two
The council's housing delivery action plan of June 2025 puts over half the district inside the South Downs National Park, which runs through its middle and separates the coastal towns of Seaford, Newhaven and Peacehaven from the villages of the Low Weald to the north.
- Who decides where. The National Park Authority has been the local planning authority for the Park since 2011, and that includes the county town of Lewes itself, Ditchling, Kingston and Rodmell. The district council decides in Seaford, Newhaven, Peacehaven, Telscombe and the Low Weald villages.
- Two plans. The Joint Core Strategy of 2016 was adopted by both authorities. The Park Authority adopted its own South Downs Local Plan in July 2019, and in May 2026 it published the replacement for final comments, which ran until 23 June 2026.
- A council under designation. In May 2024 the council was designated in respect of major applications; its action plan explains that applicants for major schemes may apply straight to the Planning Inspectorate instead.
A Supply Figure Last Set in September 2023
The council's Authority Monitoring Report for 2024 to 2025 records 2.73 years at September 2023, no update published in 2025, and an acceptance that the district outside the Park cannot show five years of deliverable sites. Two numbers have been attached to that one base date:
| Where it appears | Figure | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|
| The council's own position at September 2023, repeated in its action plan of June 2025 | 2.73 years | Measured outside the Park with the 5% buffer the action plan records |
| The inspector at Wivelsfield Green, March 2025 | Around 2.6 years | The same base date, which the council called its most recent figure; the decision gives no working |
| The monitoring report for 2024 to 2025 | No update published | The council accepts it cannot show five years of deliverable sites |
The decision gives no working for around 2.6 years. Since the council called the September 2023 position its most recent figure, the likeliest explanation is a recalculated statement of that same position at the appeal, not a new assessment. For a landowner the difference changes little: both are little more than half of five years, the council does not contest the shortfall, and a delivery result below 85% now brings a 20% buffer into any fresh calculation.
Completions Against Two Yardsticks
The monitoring report measures completions against the 2016 plan, which asks for 275 homes a year outside the Park: 536 in 2022 to 2023, 516 in 2023 to 2024 and 213 in 2024 to 2025, with affordable completions falling from 249 in the middle year to 40 in the last. The land availability assessment of October 2025 gives the standard method figure for the same plan area as 682 homes a year, after an agreed apportionment with the Park Authority. Because the 2016 plan is more than five years old, national policy replaces its requirement with the standard method when supply is tested, so the gap between 275 and 682 is what any new statement must absorb. A supply gap is weighed as evidence of unmet need, never treated as an automatic finding, but with delivery below 75% need is treated as evidenced whatever the next statement says.
The 2016 Plan and Its 6,900 Homes
The Joint Core Strategy, adopted by the district council in May 2016 and by the Park Authority the following month, provides for a minimum of 6,900 homes between 2010 and 2030, 345 a year across the whole district. It never claimed to meet need: its own text puts the objectively assessed need at 9,200 to 10,400 homes and explains why meeting it in full would not be sustainable, naming the Park, flood risk at Lewes, Newhaven and Seaford, the capacity of the A27 and A259 and coastal erosion. Its hierarchy puts Lewes, Seaford, Newhaven and Peacehaven with Telscombe first as district centres, then Newick and Ringmer as rural service centres, then service villages such as Barcombe Cross, Plumpton Green and Wivelsfield Green.
Part 2, Planning Boundaries and the Neighbourhood Plans
The Local Plan Part 2, adopted in February 2020 for the area outside the Park, draws a planning boundary around each settlement under policy DM1, within which development is permitted, and allows affordable homes on rural exception sites under policy DM2. It had to find a minimum of only 127 further homes, because growth at Newhaven, Newick, Plumpton Green, Ringmer and Wivelsfield Green was planned through made neighbourhood plans. Its allocations include around 300 homes at the Marina in Newhaven under policy NH02, which gained permission for 337 in 2023 to 2024.
The council's timetable of February 2026 lists eight made neighbourhood plans. Yet the action plan counts 22 neighbourhood plan allocations, 373 homes, and three Part 1 and Part 2 allocations, 420 homes, still without permission in June 2025.
Designated, Refused and Decided at Appeal
The action plan records that 13 of the 40 major applications the council determined between April 2021 and March 2023 were allowed on appeal, and 15 of 41 to March 2024, a rate of 36%. Designation for major applications followed in May 2024. Two recent cases show how the balance is being struck:
- Wivelsfield Green, six homes, dismissed. In March 2025 an inspector dismissed an appeal for six homes on Slugwash Lane: harm to the setting of Baldings, a Grade II listed building, engaged the part of the presumption that protects designated heritage, and the public benefits fell well short of outweighing it.
- Turnpike Farm, Ringmer, up to 180 homes, refused. On 5 August 2026 the planning committee voted to refuse an outline application east of Broyle Side on landscape and highway safety grounds, against an officer recommendation to approve that relied on the tilted balance, on a site proposed for inclusion in the emerging plan. The council had to notify the government of its proposed decision, giving the Secretary of State the option to call it in.
Outside the Park the presumption is in play and the council does not dispute it; heritage, landscape and scale are where it fights. The next test is an appeal by Sigma Strategic Land against the council's failure to decide application LW/25/0527, for up to 100 homes on land south of South Road, Wivelsfield Green. The local press reported in September 2026 that a two-day hearing had been set for 20 October 2026, sitting at Marine Workshops in Newhaven, and that the council's case is that the shortage does not justify development disproportionate to the size, role and function of the village.
The New Plan: 8,570 Homes Against a Need of 15,000
The council consulted on its replacement plan under Regulation 18 in January and February 2025, on policies, and from 18 December 2025 to 28 February 2026, on the spatial strategy and site allocations. Its announcement of the second consultation put the government formula at approximately 15,000 homes to 2042 and the strategy's capacity at approximately 8,570, with the council leader calling the national target entirely unreasonable. The land availability assessment behind it, at 30 September 2025, shows how much more land was offered:
| Land availability assessment, October 2025 | Sites or homes |
|---|---|
| Sites assessed for homes, of 402 reviewed | 241 |
| Deliverable or developable | 36 sites, 2,075 homes |
| Potentially deliverable or developable | 94 sites, 12,234 homes |
| Not deliverable or developable | 111 sites |
| Windfall allowance | 42 homes a year |
| Total potential capacity to 2044 | 19,198 homes |
The report does not explain the 269-home gap; its text speaks of the next twenty years while the table runs from 2020 to 2044, so the likeliest reason is a text figure not updated with the table. Either total is more than twice 8,570, so the lower figure reflects judgements on constraints and suitability, not a shortage of land put forward. The report says it allocates nothing and that inclusion is no sign a site will be looked on favourably in a planning decision.
The Timetable, and the Deadline Behind It
The council's Local Development Scheme of February 2026 records a deadline of 31 December 2026 for submission under the transitional arrangements and sets out the stages:
| Stage | Council's timetable |
|---|---|
| Proposed submission version (Regulation 19) | Summer 2026 |
| Submission to the Secretary of State | Winter 2026 |
| Examination | Spring 2027 |
| Adoption | Winter 2027, subject to progress at the examination |
When we checked on 29 September 2026 the council's local plan page, last updated on 20 March 2026, still listed the Phase 2 consultation as the latest stage and showed no Regulation 19 consultation, so the summer 2026 date had not visibly been met. The Regulation 19 plan, when it appears, is the version the inspector will examine; our call for sites guide walks through the stages.
Routes Outside the Park, and the Different Rules Inside It
With the presumption engaged, four routes are open in the district council's area, and different rules apply inside the Park:
- Inside a planning boundary: policy S4. Plots, large gardens, backland and redundant buildings within the boundaries drawn by Part 2 fall under policy S4, where refusal needs harm that would substantially outweigh the benefits.
- Land well related to a town or village: policy S5. A field or paddock adjoining Seaford, Newhaven, Peacehaven, Telscombe, Ringmer, Newick, Plumpton Green or Wivelsfield Green, served by infrastructure, falls under policy S5, and with a delivery result of 60% the unmet need it asks for is treated as evidenced.
- Rural exception sites: policy DM2. Land beside a village that would not get market housing can carry affordable homes for local people; see our paddocks and small sites page.
- Through the plan. A larger field that belongs in the strategy is best put forward before the Regulation 19 version is settled, with the evidence it will need at examination.
- Inside the National Park. The Park Authority's May 2026 plan makes provision for 6,735 homes Park-wide from 2024 to 2042, and under its policy SDC4 major development is refused unless exceptional circumstances are shown. The district council's delivery and supply figures do not apply there.
Our how it works page sets out what follows the first map check.
Lewes Ahead of Its December 2026 Deadline
The Housing Delivery Test 2025 was published on 17 August 2026, and the test is annual. We do not predict results, but the measure asked for 2,341 homes over three years, when the council built 1,398, and the monitoring report records 213 in 2024 to 2025. A result at or above 75% would stop need being treated as evidenced under policy S5, while the shortfall would remain evidence to be weighed.
A Figure Three Years Old, and the South Road Appeal
The monitoring report for 2024 to 2025 carried no new supply figure, and the council's reported case in the South Road appeal at Wivelsfield Green accepts the shortfall without putting a new number on it. Until a figure is published, the 2.73 years from September 2023 remains the council's latest, and with delivery below 75% an application outside the Park does not depend on it.
The Plan's Dates, and What a Slip Would Mean
The council's timetable notes that the 31 December 2026 deadline applies to plans made under the existing system, so a plan submitted later would have to follow the new plan-making system instead. If the date holds, the examination the timetable puts in spring 2027 will test whether 8,570 homes against a need of 15,000 can be justified by the Park, the coast and the road network.
The government's July 2026 decision on a single council for East Sussex was put under review on 7 September 2026, with May 2027 elections on existing boundaries, as our East Sussex page sets out, so the district council remains the authority preparing this plan.
For timing, a field outside the Park gains nothing by waiting while a delivery result below 75% keeps need evidenced, whereas land inside the Park moves with the Park Authority's own plan, published for final comments in May 2026.
Questions About Land in Lewes
My field is between Lewes and Ringmer. Which council would decide an application?
It depends on the Park boundary, which runs close to the town. Land inside it goes to the National Park Authority under its own plan, where major development is refused except in exceptional circumstances; land outside it goes to the district council, where the presumption applies.
The council was designated in 2024. Can I apply straight to the Planning Inspectorate?
Designation lets an applicant for a major scheme apply directly to the Inspectorate. Whether that is the better route depends on the site and on whether the designation still stands when we apply.
The committee voted to refuse up to 180 homes at Turnpike Farm in August 2026. Does that close Ringmer to new land?
No. Officers recommended approval under the tilted balance, the committee voted to refuse on landscape and highway safety grounds, and the site is one proposed for inclusion in the emerging plan, so the argument was about the impact of that scheme rather than whether Ringmer, a rural service centre, should grow.
My land was rated potentially developable in the land availability assessment. Does that mean anything?
It means the council did not rule it out, but the assessment does not allocate land and says a rating should not be taken to mean a site will be looked on favourably in a planning decision. Moving it up needs evidence on access, landscape and drainage, which we pay for.
Peacehaven and Telscombe might leave East Sussex under reorganisation. Should I wait?
No. The decision is under review, the May 2027 elections are on existing boundaries, and the district council still decides applications and is preparing the plan. Waiting only moves a site past the Regulation 19 stage, where allocations are settled.
What price will you pay for my land?
We agree a fixed price with you at the start, before any planning work begins, and it is set above what your land is worth today. We cannot name a figure before we have looked at your land, because it depends on the site itself: its size, its access, how many homes it could take and the costs that come off land value, such as affordable housing, road works and drainage. After the free desktop review we can talk about a price, and once agreed it is written into the agreement.
When would I be paid?
You receive the agreed price on completion, once planning permission has been secured. The agreement sets out the milestones along the way, and it continues while any planning application or appeal is being decided. Until completion you carry on using your land as you do now, and we pay for all of the planning. If permission is not granted, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Tell Us About Your Land in Lewes
It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly.
- We reply within 2 working days, by phone or email, whichever you prefer.
- The desktop review is free and confidential, with no obligation.
- If we agree terms, we pay for all of the planning, which on a larger site can reach £300,000.
More in East Sussex
County overview
Selling Land in East Sussex
Selling land across East Sussex? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 89%
Selling Land in Wealden
Selling land in Wealden? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 3.65 years.
Neighbouring council · Housing Delivery Test: 50%
Selling Land in Brighton and Hove
Selling land in Brighton and Hove? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing.
Housing Delivery Test: 23%
Selling Land in Eastbourne
Selling land in Eastbourne? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 1.4 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 35%
Selling Land in Rother
Selling land in Rother? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 3.04 years.
Housing Delivery Test: 44%
Selling Land in Hastings
Selling land in Hastings? We agree your price up front and pay for all the planning. If it fails, you keep your land and owe nothing. Supply: 1.65 years.
Neighbouring Councils Beyond East Sussex
- Mid SussexWest Sussex · 3.75 years of housing land
Sources
- Lewes District Council: Lewes District Local Plan Part 1, Joint Core Strategy (May 2016)
- Lewes District Council: Lewes District Local Plan Part 2, Site Allocations and Development Management Policies (February 2020)
- Lewes District Council: Authority Monitoring Report 2024 to 2025
- Lewes District Council: Housing Delivery Test Action Plan (June 2025)
- Lewes District Council: Local Development Scheme 2025 to 2028 (February 2026)
- Lewes District Council: Land Availability Assessment 2025 Report (October 2025)
- Lewes District Council: Lewes Local Plan (March 2026)
- Lewes District Council: Cabinet green light for next Lewes District Local Plan consultation (December 2025)
- Planning Inspectorate: Appeal decision APP/P1425/W/24/3351850, land north of Slugwash Gardens, Wivelsfield Green (March 2025)
- South Downs National Park Authority: South Downs Local Plan, Proposed Submission, Regulation 19 (May 2026)
- Sussex Express: Councillors back refusal of controversial housing development near Ringmer (August 2026)
- Sussex Express: Appeal date set for major East Sussex housing development bid (September 2026)
Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.