Bedfordshire council area

Selling Land in Central Bedfordshire

Central Bedfordshire is ahead of the government's delivery test, yet on 22 July 2026 its supply of housing land dropped to 3.93 years. That was the day the strategic policies of its 2021 plan turned five and the standard method became the yardstick. Consultation on what its new plan to 2050 should contain opens on 30 November 2026.

Free review of your land in Central Bedfordshire or call 07958 351879

We pay for the planning, at our own cost and risk
Your price is agreed up front, in writing
If planning is refused, you keep your land and owe nothing

Market Towns, Luton's Edge and a Plan That Turned Five in July

Central Bedfordshire Council is a unitary council that decides every planning application between Bedford and Luton. It has no dominant town: Leighton Buzzard, Dunstable and Houghton Regis lie in the south west, Flitwick, Ampthill and Cranfield in the middle, and Biggleswade, Sandy, Potton, Shefford, Stotfold and Arlesey in the east.

Ahead on delivery. The council built 6,182 homes against a requirement of 5,910 in the Housing Delivery Test 2025, a result of 105%.
A plan now 5 years old. The Local Plan 2015 to 2035, adopted in July 2021, plans for "at least 39,350 new homes" by 2035, including 7,350 for Luton's unmet need by 2031.
Short of land, and more so since July. 4.83 years on the plan's own figure; 3.93 years on the standard method.
Chalk and Green Belt in the south. The council records land by the Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs as inside both the Chilterns National Landscape and the South Bedfordshire Green Belt.

Three planning pictures share one council: open countryside in the middle and east, Green Belt and downland in the south, and a few very large allocations the plan depends on. Which of those your land sits in decides most of what follows.

Central Bedfordshire in Figures

The government's latest figures for the council, its latest five-year housing land supply, and where its local plan stands.

Housing Delivery Test 2025
105%
Meeting its housing requirement.
Five-year housing land supply
3.93 years
Short of five years: national policy treats this as evidence of unmet housing need. Position at 1 April 2026, measured against local housing need by the standard method, 2,210 homes a year, plus a 5% buffer, which replaced the adopted plan requirement when the plan turned five on 22 July 2026. Stated by Central Bedfordshire Council (addendum to its April 2026 statement; 4.83 years against the adopted plan requirement before 22 July 2026).
Checked source
Homes built against homes needed
6,182
of 5,910 needed, April 2022 to March 2025
Most recent strategic plan adopted
July 2021
More than five years old, so its housing figures are usually replaced by the government's standard method.
New plan progress
Updated
Local Plan 2050 under the new system: Gateway 1 on 23 October 2026, consultation on proposed content 30 November 2026 to 18 January 2027
Checked source

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

How the Supply Slipped Below Five Years, Then Fell Further

The figure of 3.93 years comes from the council's five-year housing land supply statement for the five years from 1 April 2026, now in a second version with an addendum. It works the sums twice: against the adopted plan, and against the standard method, which the addendum says must be used from 22 July 2026, when the plan's strategic policies turned five. The 9,124 deliverable homes are the same in both; only the yardstick moves.

Source: Central Bedfordshire Council, five-year housing land supply statement and methodology, version 2, with its addendum.
Part of the calculation	Adopted plan	Standard method
Yearly figure	1,967.5 homes (39,350 over 2015 to 2035)	2,210 homes, from 133,749 existing homes and an affordability ratio of 10.61
Past delivery	23,155 homes, care homes included, over 2015 to 2026: 1,513 ahead of the plan, leaving 16,195 for nine years (1,799.4 a year)	No adjustment
Five years, with a 5% buffer	8,997 plus 5%, making 9,447	11,050 plus 5%, making 11,603
Deliverable supply, 2026 to 2031	9,124 homes	9,124 homes
Result	4.83 years	3.93 years

The council is not behind on building: it is 1,513 homes ahead of its plan, and the buffer is 5% because there has been no significant under delivery. The gap comes from the yardstick, which asks for about 410 more homes a year than the plan had left to build. And a third of the supply is windfall, land the plan never allocated: 2,532 homes on such sites with permission and 539 more allowed for sites yet to come.

Already in the Committee Reports

Up to 150 homes behind Crawley Road, Cranfield, went back to committee on 23 September 2026, after members had resolved to refuse them on 1 July. The officer report records the fall from 4.83 years to 3.93 years, accepts that the site lies outside Cranfield's settlement envelope, quotes the national policy on evidenced unmet need and again recommends approval, subject to a section 106 agreement.

Two Appeals, Two Outcomes

At Holly Farm on Flitton Hill, an appeal for nine self-build homes was dismissed in April 2025 although the inspector put the supply at 4.93 years, against the council's 5.05. Residents would have relied on cars, with a bus every two hours and a mostly unlit lane to walk, and the homes would have spread behind and well beyond the existing houses. At land north of Sandy Road, Potton, the council conceded a shortfall, putting its own figure at 4.85 years, and chose not to defend its reasons for refusal, and in September 2025 the inspector allowed up to 125 homes outside the settlement envelope. Both were decided under the framework then in force, but the lesson holds: location and access decide the case.

What the Shortfall Changes Outside the Green Belt

Policy S5 of the national framework, as revised in August 2026, allows homes beyond a settlement's limits where they meet an evidenced unmet need, and a supply short of five years is one way that need is shown. It is weighed, not automatic. The site has to sit physically against an existing town or village, with roads, schools and drainage that can absorb the extra households.

The shortfall is not new; its depth is. At Holly Farm the inspector called a supply just under five years a "modest shortfall". A deeper gap is harder to dismiss that way, so the settlement envelopes of the 2021 plan hold back well placed land less firmly than before July. A field that shares a boundary with houses in Potton, Langford, Shefford or Cranfield, with a safe access and a walk to the school, has a stronger hand. A field on a lane a mile from the shop still meets the objection that sank Holly Farm.

The delivery result plays no part. At 105%, none of the Housing Delivery Test's consequences applies here.

Green Belt Around Dunstable and Chalk on the Downs

S5 does not reach into the Green Belt. There, land that contributes little to Green Belt purposes can count as grey belt, and national policy allows homes on it where the need is shown. The usual evidence is a delivery test result under 75% or less than five years of supply. At 3.93 years, the second is plain. Larger schemes on Green Belt land carry the Golden Rules as well, covering affordable homes, infrastructure and public green space, as our grey belt guide explains.

Grey belt is judged parcel by parcel. The council's report on the National Trust's Chiltern Gateway Centre at Whipsnade records land "washed over by the South Bedfordshire Green Belt", inside the Chilterns National Landscape and within 200 metres of the Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs Site of Special Scientific Interest. Land with those protections is a hard case under any housing figures. Yards, depots and parcels hemmed in by roads or housing are far better prospects.

Homes for Luton, and the Argument at Flitwick

Under the duty to cooperate, the adopted plan commits the council to 7,350 homes for Luton's unmet need by 2031. More broadly, the council describes a plan that "planned across our whole area. This includes Green Belt land."

Whether that need still stands is now contested. In June 2025 the committee refused 170 homes south of Steppingley Road, Flitwick against officers' advice, after about 5,500 objections. Councillor Heather Townsend said the land "was taken out of the greenbelt to meet Luton's unmet need, which is no longer needed".

A committee view is not a policy change. The allocation stands, and Luton's need after 2031 is for the new plan to settle. The county picture is on our Bedfordshire page.

Marston Vale, Tempsford and East West Rail

The largest allocation, the Marston Vale new villages, provides for up to four villages, up to 5,000 homes and at least 40 hectares of employment land north of Lidlington, with an interchange planned at Ridgmont station. Large sites move slowly: after an appeal at Langford Road, Biggleswade, the council accepted that the 220 Marston Vale homes it had counted within five years were not deliverable, and took them out, as the Holly Farm decision records. Delays like that leave need to be met on smaller sites.

Tempsford. The government's New Towns Draft Programme of 23 March 2026 proposes over 40,000 homes and a station where East West Rail meets the East Coast Main Line, but no homes "until wider flood mitigations are in place". The government intends to adopt the programme later in 2026, once its environmental assessments are complete.
East West Rail. Its 2026 consultation, which ran from 14 April to 9 June, proposed new Marston Vale line stations at Woburn Sands, Ridgmont, Lidlington and Stewartby.
Neither grants permission. Both will shape where the 2050 plan looks, so land near a future station deserves an early look.

The Land We Look for in Central Bedfordshire

Fields adjoining towns and larger villages outside the Green Belt, such as Biggleswade, Sandy, Potton, Stotfold, Arlesey and Cranfield.
Green Belt parcels around Dunstable and the Luton fringe that may be grey belt.
Plots and backland inside settlements, judged under policy S4, which favours approval unless harm substantially outweighs benefit.
Yards, depots and other previously developed land.
Larger holdings for the 2050 plan, especially near Ridgmont, Lidlington, Flitwick or Sandy stations.

Downland in the Chilterns National Landscape and fields that plainly keep two towns apart are harder, and we will say so. Size is no bar either way: the call for sites set aside land too small for ten homes, but a smaller plot inside a village can still go forward as an application on its own merits. For the rest, we fix the price with you on day one, set higher than the land's present value, then fund and manage every stage of the planning ourselves, at our own risk. If permission is granted, we complete and you receive the agreed price; if not, you keep your land and owe nothing, and you keep using it throughout. See how it works.

Gateway 1 in October, the Plan's Proposed Content in November

The council's Local Plan timetable moves the 2050 plan onto the new plan-making system and states: "We are not starting the Local Plan again."

23 October 2026: Gateway 1 self-assessment summary published.
30 November 2026 to 18 January 2027: consultation on the plan's proposed content.
31 March 2027: Gateway 2, with feedback from a planning inspector.
27 October 2027: eight weeks of consultation on the proposed plan.
1 June 2028: submission, with adoption to be decided on 28 December 2028.

The call for sites, held from November 2024 to January 2025, drew 626 sites. The council has initially discounted 174 for housing, for reasons including a site being too small for ten homes, facing a legal or ownership impediment, or being poorly connected to a settlement. It aims to finish its land availability assessment "towards the end of the year". Our call for sites guide explains each stage.

Supply, Delivery Test and Tempsford

The next annual statement will be the first built on the standard method from the outset. The Housing Delivery Test 2025 came out on 17 August 2026. The test's steps sit at 95% (an action plan), 85% (a 20% buffer) and 75% (unmet need treated as shown), and at 105% Central Bedfordshire clears all three. If Tempsford is confirmed, it will tell the plan where its largest growth goes.

Well related land outside the Green Belt, and grey belt in the south, can be reviewed for an application now, while the shortfall stands.
Larger or less connected land is better aimed at the November 2026 consultation.

Questions About Land in Central Bedfordshire

My field is just outside the settlement envelope at Cranfield or Langford. Does the shortfall help?

It can, if the land reads as part of the village with a safe access and a walk to services. Officers recommended up to 150 homes outside Cranfield's envelope for approval in September, although members had resolved in July to refuse them. A detached field down a narrow lane is a weaker case.

My land near Flitwick was released from the Green Belt for Luton. Is the allocation safe?

It remains in the adopted plan, but the Steppingley Road refusal shows members questioning the Luton need. The 2050 plan will decide, so the November consultation matters.

Was my 2024 call for sites submission one of the 174 discounted?

The council has published its reasons: too small for ten homes, an ownership impediment, or poor connection to a settlement. A larger area or better access can sometimes answer them, and we prepare that evidence at our cost.

My farm is near Tempsford. Should I wait for the new town decision?

Not before a review. Homes there wait on wider flood works, while land beside Sandy, Potton or a village may have a nearer route through S5 or the 2050 plan.

My paddock is in the Green Belt below Dunstable Downs. Is grey belt realistic?

Possibly, if housing or roads contain it and it does little to separate towns. Land on the chalk inside the National Landscape is far harder, so we check your field first.

Tell Us About Your Land in Central Bedfordshire

It takes about two minutes. We only need your postcode, your name and a phone number or email; the rest helps us look properly. We reply within 2 working days, in confidence.

About your land

Which council area is the land in?

Own land in more than one area? Choose one here and tell us about the others below.

Postcode or nearest village *

Approximate size in acres

About 4.0 hectares. Not sure? Give your best guess.

Current use

Where is it?

Access

Land Registry title number (optional)

Your details

We need a phone number or an email address, whichever you prefer.

Your name *

Phone

Best time to call (optional)

Anything else we should know? (optional)

We use your details only to reply about your land. We do not contact the council or anyone else about it without your agreement. See our privacy notice.

Sources

Figures on this page come from the Housing Delivery Test 2025 (published 17 August 2026) and the Planning Inspectorate's local plan monitoring to August 2026, with newer plan milestones checked on 24 September 2026. We update the page when new results or plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.